Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.

    Bioenergetic Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Why do you believe in God?

    The Junkyard
    18
    57
    2.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User
      last edited by A Former User

      Hi, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2CuAVAERjs funny short on "god"

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Norwegian MugabeN
        Norwegian Mugabe @bruh
        last edited by

        @bruh you have faith in what you know. The deeper you get to know God, the more meaningful your life becomes.

        Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

        Ignore, judge, overcommit.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • VirtueAgonistV
          VirtueAgonist
          last edited by

          I like Saint Anselm’s that-than-which-nothing-greater-can-be-thought argument. Aristotle, Plotinus, Augustine, and Aquinas are S tier too.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Norwegian MugabeN
            Norwegian Mugabe
            last edited by

            Leibniz’ Contingency Argument is another argument that seems to be absolutely correct.

            The argument goes like this:

            1. Every contingent fact has an explanation.
            2. There is a contingent fact that includes all other contingent facts.
            3. Therefore, there is an explanation of this fact.
            4. This explanation must involve a necessary being.
            5. This necessary being is God.

            Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

            Ignore, judge, overcommit.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User @Norwegian Mugabe
              last edited by

              @Norwegian-Mugabe Hi, what do you mean by "god"?

              KvirionK Norwegian MugabeN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • KvirionK
                Kvirion @A Former User
                last edited by Kvirion

                There can be a pantheistic god... Or maybe not...
                A theistic god is rather just a fairytale to keep normies behaving in order (keep their heads down)...

                A little learning is a dangerous thing ;
                Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring :
                There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
                And drinking largely sobers us again.
                ~Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Norwegian MugabeN
                  Norwegian Mugabe @A Former User
                  last edited by

                  @Truth Lol, don't go full Juden Peterstein on me. If you see the video I just posted which explains the contingency argument, you will find a good definition of god at the end of the video.

                  Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

                  Ignore, judge, overcommit.

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ?
                    A Former User @Norwegian Mugabe
                    last edited by

                    @Norwegian-Mugabe I'm going full elementary question, what meaning do you personally give to the word "god", what characteristics do you associate with it?

                    Norwegian MugabeN Z 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Norwegian MugabeN
                      Norwegian Mugabe @A Former User
                      last edited by

                      @Truth What we can know from the arguments posted earlier in this thread, is that someone or something created the universe (God). God is also the greatest possible being. I think that much of God's other properties are speculation. Some guesses are better than others, but there are certain things that it seems like we are unable to get answer to by reason alone.

                      Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

                      Ignore, judge, overcommit.

                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User @Norwegian Mugabe
                        last edited by

                        @Norwegian-Mugabe What do you mean by "greatest possible being", in terms of size, in terms of the value you personally give to it?

                        Norwegian MugabeN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Norwegian MugabeN
                          Norwegian Mugabe @A Former User
                          last edited by

                          @Truth God is the greatest being in terms of abilities and influence.

                          Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

                          Ignore, judge, overcommit.

                          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User @Norwegian Mugabe
                            last edited by A Former User

                            @Norwegian-Mugabe Are there any specific reasons why you perceive it as external to us, rather than partly within us or totally within us?

                            Norwegian MugabeN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Norwegian MugabeN
                              Norwegian Mugabe @A Former User
                              last edited by

                              @Truth Yes the arguments posted earlier shows that the Universe was created contigently. See the following arguments: Kalam's cosmological argument, Aquinas Argument from Necessity , and Leibniz’ Contingency Argument.

                              Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

                              Ignore, judge, overcommit.

                              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User @Norwegian Mugabe
                                last edited by

                                @Norwegian-Mugabe in this thought, do they imply or do you imply that this thing, is a being,(Being often has a personifying connotation), and potentially assumes that this "being" has intentions?

                                Norwegian MugabeN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Norwegian MugabeN
                                  Norwegian Mugabe @A Former User
                                  last edited by

                                  @Truth None of those three agruments imply intentions, but some arguments for God's existence do imply intetion. I thnik for instace, that all forms of The Mozart Argument imply that God values beauty. It might be possible to argue that you can infer intention from Anselm of Canterbury's argument too.

                                  Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

                                  Ignore, judge, overcommit.

                                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User @Norwegian Mugabe
                                    last edited by

                                    @Norwegian-Mugabe No distinction between a being and a thing (such as a stone) in this argument? If there is, what contributes to the perception of "god" as a "being" rather than a thing (such as a stone) in this idea?

                                    Norwegian MugabeN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Norwegian MugabeN
                                      Norwegian Mugabe @A Former User
                                      last edited by

                                      @Truth again the arugments differ on this. Kalam's argument does not say what kind of being/force it would be that created the universe. Anselm of Canterbury's argument certainly states that God must be the greatest possible being.

                                      Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

                                      Ignore, judge, overcommit.

                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ?
                                        A Former User @Norwegian Mugabe
                                        last edited by

                                        @Norwegian-Mugabe Which of these two is part of your idea of "god"?

                                        Norwegian MugabeN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Z
                                          zawisza @A Former User
                                          last edited by

                                          This post is deleted!
                                          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Norwegian MugabeN
                                            Norwegian Mugabe @A Former User
                                            last edited by

                                            @Truth Both of these arguments are valid arguments for God. Kalam's argument is perhaps the greatest argument of all, but this argument does not state much about the kind of being God is.
                                            If you truly want spiritual wholeness and develop a deep relationship with God, then I reccomend spending time hiking in nature. If you sit in silence in nature you will feel in your gut what purpose you should take on. I also reccomend to train yourself to be a lover of beauty. Listen to classical music and make your surrondings as beautiful as possible.

                                            Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.

                                            Ignore, judge, overcommit.

                                            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 2 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post