The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy
-
@Truth You are not addressing any of my points, lol. This is just more personal attacks. You are like a child, except you are not open and upbeat. You seem to suffer from hypersexuality as sex is the only thing you discuss.
Blacks have lower intelligence, and women have less brain and muscle mass, and lower metabolism. People with greater structure will have more output benefits from higher energy levels. We are standing before an Aryan eugenic supercycle. This is my point and I am right. This is also the most positive news imaginable, so I cannot grasp why you are so irritated by it.@Creuset I am not familiar with Michael Levin, thanks for pointing me in that direction. I have naturally read both Ray and the Arab, as I have posted regarding them on this forum several times. Ray undervalued the importance of genetics. You can foster a great or bad bulldog by changing its energy levels, but it still will not become a Schäfer. Genes are as important as the environment. The differences between races are 10,000+ years of epigenetics and breeding. I strongly advocate for eugenics within all races. Taleb's view of IQ has been refuted again and again (See an example). IQ is real, heritable, and of extremely great value.
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Creuset I am not familiar with Michael Levin, thanks for pointing me in that direction.
You're welcome. You will see that he is doing incredible things with biolectricity and morphogenetic fields, not just correcting genetical defects. He actually created real chimeras, new organisms that have never existed and were not selected (which makes him skeptical of natural selection), biological robots made from frog skin cells, he regenerated full limbs in amputated animals, and many other things. He basically says that wanting to work with genes is akin to "micromanaging" and seems to think that working with bioelectricity yields much better results. His work is groundbreaking, and a confirmation of a lot of Peat's ideas in the field of genetics and other biological ideas, which should have you at least question a bit of your current ideas, and at least nuance them.
Ray undervalued the importance of genetics.
I don't think he necessarily undervalued it, I think that he wasn't a genetic determinist as he understood a lot of things, as a pioneer, that are not yet known in mainstream science, and was annoyed that this deterministic paradigm was polluting scientific progress, and used as a dumb justification for eugenics. He saw that other pathways could optimize organisms' health and promote other desirable traits, especially morphogenetic fields, and that science in the future would completely change, whereas staying trapped into this genetic determinism paradigm is litterally preventing us from evolving culturally. Fortunately, people like Michael Levin had the courage and means to explore these topics, and he is slowly bringing them to the mainstream.
You can foster a great or bad bulldog by changing its energy levels, but it still will not become a Schäfer.
I'm not talking about epigenetics or just changing the environment, but directly altering morphogenetic fields. If I remember correctly, a geneticist called Eva Jablonka was promoting the idea of dimensionality in evolution, involving Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic evolution. I think this is a much more balanced view that just denying one dimension in favor of another. I would also add Lamarckian evolution and Morphogenetic evolution to other dimensions, and I suspect that Morphogenetic evolution would be probably the most fundamental one.Here is a hint that Morphogenetic evolution could happen in nature: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/12/231205114816.htm
By the way, Lamarckianism goes way further than just epigenetics, as this implies a mutation of the genetic structure, not just the expression of genes. You even have weird phenomenon like Phenocopy that don't involve any genetic mutation.
Genes are as important as the environment.
I'm not denying that genes are important, but that doesn't make me a genetic determinist and a eugenist (which implies sterilizing people by force and is based on hatred and aggression).
I strongly advocate for eugenics within all races.
Eugenics alone wouldn't do much for the improvement of global health and intelligence, especially since the environment is so polluted and life conditions are declining worldwide. Epigenetic inheritance is also a thing.
I also believe that this is a very inhuman way of treating humans in 2024, considering that our scientific understanding has evolved and that we can optimize things without necessarily needing discrimination, aggression or forcing people to do things against their will.
Taleb's view of IQ has been refuted again and again ([See an example] https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2019/01/08/nassim-taleb-on-iq/)).
I've read this refutation few years ago and if I remember correctly, I had spotted some mistakes. I will need to reread it though as I did not take notes back then and will let you know if I can find them back.
IQ is real, heritable, and of extremely great value.
Then why are there studies that show that children of mixed races sometimes get "hybrid vigor" or heterosis, in this case they get taller than both parents, and get a higher measured IQ than any of the parents? https://socgen.ucla.edu/2015/07/02/diverse-parental-genes-lead-to-taller-smarter-children-finds-extensive-study/
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
If Aryans have a structural value of 10 and Nigerians have a structural value of 3, then maximizing energy levels to 10 for both these groups will lead to an increased difference in quality. You can basically multiply 10X10 and compare it to 3X10
This is a fallacy that ignores a possibility of diminishing returns and non-linear effects in general.
For example, corrective glasses can help myopia, but the degree of improvement will vary with initial impairment: someone with -7 diopters will benefit far more than someone with -1. It's far easier to get a beginner from nothing to a 100 lb deadlift that is to add 10 pounds to an elite powerlifter's DL.
In the same vein, many Peaty interventions may exhibit diminishing returns. For example, if progesterone and thyroid supplementation during pregnancy does boost IQ as Ray said, I would expect the most rapid improvements to occur in predominantly low IQ groups; i.e. Australian Aborigines might reach average white levels in a generation or two, effectively leapfrogging tens of thousands years of evolutionary history, while the gain among already high IQ groups like the Ashkenazis or Western European elites might be far more modest since their genetic potential has already "maxxed" that trait.
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe
Brother, just stop bringing your cold climate induced stress to forums online, please. -
Based on History, 50% of Whites are directly descended from Gods (100% descended from Gods) who visited Earth a long time ago (not of this Earth).
The most valuable features in Whites (Blue Eyes, Blonde Hair, Ginger Hair, etc.) are especially valuable because these features were derived from the Gods where as features like Black Hair is a feature associated with the evolved Homo Sapiens that were already on Earth.
Hispanics/Native Americans are 75% descended from Gods (not of this Earth) and 25% from the Evolved Homo Sapiens that were on Earth.
Africans are 50% descended from Gods and 50% descended from the Evolved Homo Sapiens that were already residing on Earth.
Asians (Chinese, etc.) are 0% descended from Gods and descend from an alternate race of people that were not of this planet.
Anyway, this in a nutshell, is why Genetics is important and why instinctively we tend to feel more comfortable around people that look like us.
But as you know, in 50 years there will be no such thing as the concept of Race, there will only be one race allowed and mass immigration is structured to set the stage for this to happen.
So, in my opinion, It’s useless for anyone to care about it at this current moment. I used to care about this, but it really is useless to care about. We all have flaws and we could all be better (in some way) - some of us wish we were taller, some of us wish we had better hair, some of us wish we had blue eyes, some of us wish we were smarter, etc.
One example to think about is this: in my country plenty of Caucasian woman tend to date African Men, etc. - According to the facts I just mentioned. This scenario should be impossible and seems to break all logic - yet it happens. So, regardless of who you are or what flaws you have. It is never over, and there’s plenty of exceptions to every rule. Being positive and focusing on yourself is all you can do.
At the end of the day, the powers that be don’t see any of you as people of value. Hence why they are pushing for one race amongst the world.
The Powers that be are all directly descended from Gods and believe they have divine right to rule (every President of the United States is directly related to Egyptian Pharaohs and the God’s, the Crown of England is directly descended from the Gods and Pharoahs as well, Rothschild/Rockefeller (that whole Ilk) is also directly descended from the Gods hence why people tend to notice they don’t look exactly human). The first humans were intentionally created to be servants/slaves. Hence why they view us the way that they do.
Anyway, pointless to worry about it, regardless of the race you are or the person you are. We’re all on the same team here and all of our future is at stake. Being positive and productive during these times is the only thing worth doing.
-
@JamesGatz said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
Based on History, 50% of Whites are directly descended from Gods (100% descended from Gods) who visited Earth a long time ago (not of this Earth).
Hispanics/Native Americans are 75% descended from Gods (not of this Earth) and 25% from the Evolved Homo Sapiens that were on Earth.
Africans are 50% descended from Gods and 50% descended from the Evolved Homo Sapiens that were already residing on Earth.
Asians (Chinese, etc.) are 0% descended from Gods and descend from an alternate race of people that were not of this planet.
Aren't you selling consultations? People really pay to get advice from a literal schizophrenic
-
@Kilgore The initial post is garbage, and promotes hatred. Individual experiences> "science", "science" are just narratives that are fictions until we verify it with our personal experiences. I ignore some of these claims because they are based on little or no personal experience, he said himself that he hasn't been to the majority of African countries, he quotes narratives to support his bias of hating non-white people. He repeats the same garbage often on these posts, the questions I asked him are relevant, because the discussion often comes back to what has the most value for the individual or the largest number of people, and he is totally confused and contradictory on that, as mentioned above.
If you enjoy and/or promote the same kind of ideas you shouldn't be listened to either.
"Eugenicists" who argue that it is optimal to ostracize people of a certain color based on narratives, rather than individually choose based on our instincts of what we prefer, are for the most part confused people with a low enough degree of energy, serenity, and feeling of power that they come to have the fantasy that they will fix their lack of energy and serenity by applying these "eugenicist"narratives, they likely just need more sunlight, potentially less bodybuilding, potentially less masturbation
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Truth You are not addressing any of my points, lol. This is just more personal attacks. You are like a child, except you are not open and upbeat. You seem to suffer from hypersexuality as sex is the only thing you discuss.
Blacks have lower intelligence, and women have less brain and muscle mass, and lower metabolism. People with greater structure will have more output benefits from higher energy levels. We are standing before an Aryan eugenic supercycle. This is my point and I am right. This is also the most positive news imaginable, so I cannot grasp why you are so irritated by it.I addressed a good part of it, you're confused.
What personal attacks are you referring to knowing that I brought up things you quoted yourself, in response to things you said?
You're sharing pictures of men's butts, not me.
What is "higher metabolism" in your fantasy?
Why do you obsess about muscle mass and want everyone to be "jacked" when being "jacked" in and of itself is not associated with a higher degree of well being, energy, longevity, fertility, nor is it associated with a higher degree of "art" production, serenity and wonder (your highest values according to you)?
What would you like to see happen to non-white people in your "aryan Babylon" fantaisy?
you started talking about depression/energy, when you yourself said that you need your "last aryan Babylon" fantasy to go on living, implying that without this meaningless fantasy, your life would have no meaning, no value, and potentially you'd do nothing and/or let yourself die
-
@CO3 So first off, I don’t sell consultations anymore, I have no money to gain from sharing this information.
You can be mad and start resorting to insults about what I said that is fine, but it does not stop it from being the truth.
The Truth is stranger than Fiction, remember that.
Why is Taller Height instinctively desired? Can you answer that question? I can.
Why are traits like Blue Eyes and Blonde Hair instinctively desired? Can you answer that question? I can.
Why are all Presidents of the United States have a lineage that traces back to One King and Several Pharoahs? Can you answer that question? Because I can.
No one teaches people to desire these traits, it’s innate and instinctive.
Can you answer why any of these traits are subconsciously desired from all people? Because I can.
I am not promoting racism or anything of the Nature. I am simply offering the real explanation why the World is the way it is. If you don’t believe me, that’s ok, you can go ahead and believe in mainstream ideas and choose your own religion, but all roads lead back to what I am telling you right now and the amount of evidence I am writing in these posts is extremely extensive and is older than any mainstream religion or book you decide to follow.
White men marry Asian women all the time. White women date Black men all the time. I’ve met Asian men that were way more successful in life and with women than nearly any White man I’ve ever known.
Energy is an extremely important factor. Men can find themselves more attracted to a High-energy black woman and a High-Energy Spanish woman over a Low-energy White woman. What I said is the truth, but you shouldn’t let it bother you, your goal in life is to be the best version of yourself.
I myself, am not concerned at all, with the facts I just mentioned. Once you do start focusing on these facts, you begin to focus on your faults and flaws and engage yourself in self-destructive behavior. This information is not meant to destroy you, this information is meant to set you free from feelings that we all instinctively feel.
What I said can only bother you if you choose to let it bother you. You can be insecure about what I said, but like I said, we all have flaws and the only thing anyone can do - is become the best version of yourself.
-
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
After like the first 5 posts, @Truth and @Norwegian-Mugabe dont even argue with each other. Do not read their replies its literally like they talk into a translator and something else comes out for the other one and vica versa. Hilarious. Like here are my questions, the other gives "answers" to something else Would be great if they used a format like I did to actually argue. Until then, they are both not to be listened to. Thread got derailed with like 5 replies
Thanks for taking the time to perceive, think, and act.
-
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
Evolutionary fitness changes due to circumstances. The goal of evolution is not to be "Aryan"; the goal is to produce the most successful offspring's. The bar for an offspring to be successful is the lowest ever. The weak will prevail. The future is dysgenic.
Then if you think the goal of evolution is to produce the most successful offsprings, I will ask again: What about heterosis/hybrid vigor that sometimes happen when you mix races?
The IQ of a white person dropped 15 points in the last 100 years. A 15-point difference represents the difference between a high school science teacher and a security guard.
What's your evidence for this 15 points drop in this specific population?
Also, let's entertain for an instant that IQ is a 100% valid model: Why was there a Flynn effect before the supposedly more recent drop in IQ, that coincides with worse environmental conditions, diet, pollution, stress, huge increase in blue light exposure and the likes?
@Creuset said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
Have you ever read what Ray Peat said about eugenics and euthenics? Or how Mae Wan Ho debunked Darwinism, the Central dogma of molecular biology, the Modern evolutionary synthesis and other things mostly ignored by promoters of eugenics?
Why do so many people base ALL their opinions on what Ray said?.
I don't base all of my opinions on what Ray said, you can for example read what I've posted in other threads about anarco-capitalism, Natural Law or my defense of deductive methods in some contexts. Although it is clear to me that Ray was a very smart man, and that most of the things he said were very carefully researched, that's why I find it difficult to disagree with him on many topics, especially related to biology. I am an independent thinker, and I have no problem to admit even truths that would be emotionally hard to swallow for most people (what you kids would call "black pill").
The reason I agree with Ray on this specific topic is that there is ample evidence that genetic determinism is an outdated paradigm. And if you understand what the scientific method is, when your null hypothesis is invalidated by contradicting evidence, you change your paradigm with a new one that can accurately account for the new evidence. If you don't, then your approach is not based on science but on faith, definitely not the kind of reaction you would expect from someone with a supposedly high IQ. By the way, so far Norwegian Mugabe took my feedback and did not reject the evidence that I provided, and I respect that as this means that he is able to update his worldview based on evidence. I wonder how many of the other people claiming to be eugenists or nazis on this forum will be able to do so?
You can also try to provide all of the meta-analysis that you want to try to cling to the old paradigm, if they don't account for the new evidence, then they just provide an incomplete view of what's happening.
Eugenics obviously works. You can say its not ethical but cant deny that it works. It works for cows and horses it will work for humans as well
It probably works, otherwise breeders wouldn't use it, I'm just saying that this is an outdated model and method, and that new ones exist that are more effective, quicker, and also pose much less moral problems as we don't have to treat humans like animals.
To use a metaphor, the way I see most eugenics proponents in 2024 is that they try to defend fighting cancer with chemotherapy, when better methods exist. Sure, it works in some contexts to remove cancer cells, but it's like trying to kill an ant with a nuclear bomb. And like I said, eugenics also doesn't take into account current disastrous environmental degradation that's destroying our health globally.
I would expect that people that are intelligent would be able to understand all of this and be more nuanced in their thinking and hold a more complex view on this topic, especially since high IQ is supposedly usually associated with higher empathy and nuance. Actually, if you really have a high metabolic rate and a high IQ, or whatever you want to use to justify that you are a superior being, your high energy state would have you hold unconditionally altruistic views of humanity like Ray did, you would want to help and develop all of humanity, not castrate, sterilize or kill people based on their current circumstances.
Have you ever taken time to read the criticisms of IQ written by Nassim Taleb? And debunks of the Bell Curve?
Of course, Taleb is against IQ. [...] Taleb still believes the vaxx is working, and for a long time he actually thought Ukraine was winning the war (credit to him; he admitted his mistake a while ago).
Fair points, I don't have anything to say against that, even Nassim Taleb that I highly respect can be wrong about some things (even though I will need to take some time this week end to reread all of the IQ debate).
He has proven himself incapable of having a neutral viewpoint on sensitive topics. He is greatly influenced by his feelings. Perhaps that is the reason he has such a unique investing strategy with his friend Mark Spitznagel (his books are worth reading, btw). That being said, I liked his books, though I liked more of the "general knowledge" he shared. (It's also funny how he ignored vaxx producers having NO skin in the game and sucked up for them. Despite writing a whole books on this topic).
So I am white, I've been detected as a gifted individual when I was a child, I am 6'5, I have success with women and I am in the top 1% of income earners. Given that, I should have no problem with all of your claims about IQ and eugenics. I'm not saying this to brag, but to show that despite all of that, here I am arguing that this is bad science, even though this should be a good ego boost for me. And to stay nuanced, I am not here to deny that IQ isn't probably at least partially and in some contexts pointing to things related to intelligence, otherwise studies wouldn't probably find correlations, yet I don't conflate this map with the territory and I see flaws and weaknesses in the model. Same with nosology for mental health diseases and conditions, there are obviously methodological flaws and weaknesses when we define a set of symptoms as "schizophrenia" in an individual, this is a simplification of reality, especially since "schizophrenia" can have multiple different causes.
I have otherwise no problem with people having personal preferences. If you, or Norwegian Mugabe prefer to have blonde and blue-eyed wives and kids and want to preserve these phenotypes, or if you only want to live with white people on your territory, that's your right and I have nothing to say about that, and would even take your defense if you were ostracized for these choices.
However, if you start promoting eugenics, then I will just chime in to remind you that this is based on bad science. And if you try to promote aggressive measures such as sterilizing non-consenting individuals, I will of course manifest bluntly that I am against that and find it stupid.
Check out this great documentary about a Chinese man who wants to order some gravel in the Congo.
Everything that can be associated with having low iq can be seen here. No accountability, a lack of understanding of the consequences of ones actions, not recognizing good opportunities, stealing from their own employers. They are literally adult children. Goebbels couldn't have made a better propaganda video and the funny thing is that this is a documentary.
Africa is a weird continent. It's very hard to build ports on the coasts due to waters being too shallow, rivers cannot be navigated normally because of rapids, and horses did not exist on the continent. There were no efficient ways of travelling, thus there were much less cultural exchanges between tribes and less memetic emergence than in other places with more favorable geographic conditions. Europe provides good geographic conditions for memetic emergence, and really started to develop culturally when protestants challenged the centralized clergy, and that the printing press was invented so that people could read the Bible and verify claims made by the centralized clergy. Information could become decentralized and circulate much faster, that was the start of a cultural emergence and revolution. I think that all of this had much more influence than just IQ.
I am otherwise familiar with the Milwaukee Project and adoption of black kids by white families supposedly bringing only minor changes in IQ. That's not a topic that I've studied extensively so I will avoid making any claims for now, even though to my knowledge there aren't been studies made on more than 1 generation, which to me seems insufficient evidence to claim that IQ is fixed.
Did you know that Michael Levin, who works on morphogenetic fields, has been able to "cure" a fatal genetic defect in an animal model by using bioelectricity?
My grandparents use a copper rod that send small frequencies of electricity through them to heal themselves (they hold it in both hands and its connected to a machine). Different frequencies for different problems. Have no idea if its working or not. But interesting nonetheless. Will check this guy out. Thanks.
On a side note, Levin is working with planarian flatworms because they are basically immortal and have endless regenerative abilities (you can cut them into different pieces and the pieces will just develop and regenerate into individual flatworms). He explains that they accumulate a lot of mutations that should make their genomes very unstable, and even have weird irregular number of chromosomes, yet they don't develop any health problems and keep their regenerative abilities and immortality as long as they are not killed. Again, more evidence that genetic determinism is an outdated paradigm.
-
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
After like the first 5 posts, @Truth and @Norwegian-Mugabe dont even argue with each other. Do not read their replies its literally like they talk into a translator and something else comes out for the other one and vica versa. Hilarious. Like here are my questions, the other gives "answers" to something else Would be great if they used a format like I did to actually argue. Until then, they are both not to be listened to. Thread got derailed with like 5 replies
Thanks for taking the time to perceive, think, and act.
You're still emotionally affected , weeks have gone by, try to free yourself from these lingering negative emotions
You thanked a guy for "perceive, think, act" , who started his comment by saying that he greatly appreciated this garbage post that promotes hate, division, and choosing to create children between "whites" only, based on narratives rather than instincts, experiences and personal preferences, and that promotes the ostracization of non-white people
you thanked him because it makes you feel a little better that someone is saying things that you perceive as confirming your bias, when his comment doesn't change anything to your confused comments from previous weeks that I commented on
-
@Peatly said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
You are either setting yourself up for a fall or you are setting the forum up. Either way it won't end well.
Being a paranoid schizophrenic is not peaty.
You are not as well informed as you think
-
@Truth said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
After like the first 5 posts, @Truth and @Norwegian-Mugabe dont even argue with each other. Do not read their replies its literally like they talk into a translator and something else comes out for the other one and vica versa. Hilarious. Like here are my questions, the other gives "answers" to something else Would be great if they used a format like I did to actually argue. Until then, they are both not to be listened to. Thread got derailed with like 5 replies
Thanks for taking the time to perceive, think, and act.
You're still emotionally affected , weeks have gone by, try to free yourself from these lingering negative emotions
You thanked a guy for "perceive, think, act" , who started his comment by saying that he greatly appreciated this garbage post that promotes hate, division, and choosing to create children between "whites" only, based on narratives rather than instincts, experiences and personal preferences, and that promotes the ostracization of non-white people
you thanked him because it makes you feel a little better that someone is saying things that you perceive as confirming your bias, when his comment doesn't change anything to your confused comments from previous weeks that I commented on
It's not about us at all, believe it or not. It's about how he perceived how the exchange went with you two. And he spent a lot of time opining relevantly to other posts on this thread, and made his last comment about how you two could make this thread more meaningful in terms of exchanging opposing ideas.
Learn to be a little more self-effacing. Then again, I would not be surprised if you would make a retort back at me. Spend more time learning bioenergetics in this space, instead of using up your energy on meaningless back and forths.
-
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Truth said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@yerrag said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
After like the first 5 posts, @Truth and @Norwegian-Mugabe dont even argue with each other. Do not read their replies its literally like they talk into a translator and something else comes out for the other one and vica versa. Hilarious. Like here are my questions, the other gives "answers" to something else Would be great if they used a format like I did to actually argue. Until then, they are both not to be listened to. Thread got derailed with like 5 replies
Thanks for taking the time to perceive, think, and act.
You're still emotionally affected , weeks have gone by, try to free yourself from these lingering negative emotions
You thanked a guy for "perceive, think, act" , who started his comment by saying that he greatly appreciated this garbage post that promotes hate, division, and choosing to create children between "whites" only, based on narratives rather than instincts, experiences and personal preferences, and that promotes the ostracization of non-white people
you thanked him because it makes you feel a little better that someone is saying things that you perceive as confirming your bias, when his comment doesn't change anything to your confused comments from previous weeks that I commented on
It's not about us at all, believe it or not. It's about how he perceived how the exchange went with you two. And he spent a lot of time opining relevantly to other posts on this thread, and made his last comment about how you two could make this thread more meaningful in terms of exchanging opposing ideas.
Learn to be a little more self-effacing. Then again, I would not be surprised if you would make a retort back at me. Spend more time learning bioenergetics in this space, instead of using up your energy on meaningless back and forths.
You replied to this last specific part of his comment, you didn't reply to his entire comment, which implies that you were thanking him for "perceive, think, act" only for this last part,
so it's obvious it's in relation to that since you're butthurt and multiple times you've commented similar things about people saying things you perceived as confirming your bias on me.You and people like the one who made the original post, you dont want "meaningfull exchanges", you want to write your non sense without being asked questions or contradicting your dubious claims.
These "bioenergetic ideas" don't seem to help you or the OP not make dumb claims, and not to hate people who don't hurt others, the OP claims that his "eugenic" garbage ideas that promote hatred, division, ostracization of non-white people based on narratives rather than our instincts, are partly bioenergetic based, which tells you all you need to know about teenagers and/or adults, who try to legitimize their own low energy and/or lingering negative emotions driven tendencies with some theoric mêmes such as "high metabolism" " better structure" "optimal blood sugar metabolism"
What have all these bioenergetic theories got you if you say yourself that you haven't yet reached your ideal of "optimal sugar metabolism" after years on the forum, and you say that's what's missing from the ideas of Raymond and other influencers?
-
@Truth said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
forths
This is a new low for you. Not only incapable of comprehending, but putting words in my mouth, and conflating things. No wonder you can't stop preaching from your high perch. Boorish!
-
@Kilgore I also support abortion. These people are hillaorusly unreasonable. They also jump to rash conclusions. When I mention eugenics, I am mostly thinking about improving and multiplying the amount of great people. I do not care that much about the lower classes(blacks and women).
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
@Kilgore I also support abortion. These people are hillaorusly unreasonable. They also jump to rash conclusions. When I mention eugenics, I am mostly thinking about improving and multiplying the amount of great people. I do not care that much about the lower classes(blacks and women).
Have fun multiplying with "great" men as you dont Care much about women.
-
@Kilgore said in The coming of the ultimate Aryan eugenic supercycle - an explanation of metabolic group hierarchy:
I have seen that you tried to argue with this person before. Unfortunately, it seems impossible to do so. He is incapable of not having an emotional meltdown about any topic whether race and IQ or religion. Does not answer or disprove any claim you make its crazy. His intellectual level is neurotic Charlie.
Not only incapable of comprehending
Yes. Unbelievable. His reply's are literally a waste.
Spend more time learning bioenergetics in this space, instead of using up your energy on meaningless back and forths.
You are right. It is a waste of time. Lets just talk about our temperatures. I have been raising mine, currently chilling at 99.2F. Sipping some warm milk with honey and cinnamon.
"emotional meltdown" I respond to guys who either write hateful comments, or guys who react to simple questions with hate, so I care less about hurting your feelings. On the "New mission on RPF" post, Yerrag admitted he was wrong, and did an "emotional meltdown" after I asked him about his fictional ideal of "optimal blood metabolism", which he thought he had a very good understanding of, and mentioned that Ray Peat had told him the same thing in an email, whereas Yerrag said that what Raymond and other influencers are missing is how to achieve this "optimal sugar metabolism" in a practical way, so it hurt his feelings that I pointed out that his idea is just fictional and that he's never experienced it.
Norwegian's posts are nonsense, because he's totally confused about his own ideas, he says that well-being isn't the highest goal in life, that the highest goal in life is art, and that Raymond shares his ideas, whereas his signature says that the goal of art is a feeling of serenity and wonder over the long term. So why does he think that serenity and wonder are the highest values in life? Because obviously in his experience these are the feelings that he prefers and that make him feel the best, so this implies that he measures what is optimal by the degree of long-term well-being that it arouses in him and/or the white men with whom he wants to multiply, and that his highest goal in life is well-being even if he's totally confused about that.
Is being "jacked" necessarily associated with a higher degree of Wonder, serenity, well-being in the long term? No, the majority of children aren't jacked, and they generally have more "Wonder" than adults. Are jacked women more serene than non-jacked women? No, of the few jacked women I've seen, they seem to more stressed and less well mentally than non-jacked women. are jacked men more serene and do they have more Wonder? No, the majority of "jacked" men i have Seen have less Wonder than non-jacked men, women and children
So it's clear that Yerrag and norwegian are confused about their ideas on these subjects I mentioned, have tendencies to mental illness, in addition to hating and/or promoting hatred of people who have done no harm to others
If you greatly appreciate this post despite norwegian's common disdain and hatred of people who aren't "white" and women, including on this post, you are confused and potentially have tendencies to mental illness, it's okay to say that from your experience you've observed differences between different people, citing fictional narratives to incite and legitimize disdain and hatred of non-white people and women, and reproduction only between whites driven by narratives, it is problematic, it promotes division, disdain and/or hatred of people who do no harm to others until proven otherwise, and it promotes a state of mental slavery, where we choose who we have children with based on narratives rather than our individual instincts and preferences
-
@Truth you got it all wrong. The Greeks did not much "care" about women but look at what they achieved. The coming Aryan eugenic supercycle cannot be stopped, and it is all about improving Aryan men towards new peaks that lesser classes can only dream of.