New "Mission" of RPF
-
@risingfire
I'm mostly joking. Nothing against them, I think they're doing good work and are honest from what I can tell.This is only to say the viewpoint seems to be that Ray was infallible, or that his messengers were, too.
-
This really bugs me about the whole Peatosphere. There's no questioning allowed. If you point out errors or inaccuracies, people sperg the fuck out.
-
True, this is one of my irritations.
It's a net positive overall because a lot of these ideas aren't supported anywhere else, and yes, obviously a lot of the science was from Eastern Europe and Russia and is dated and suppressed in the West, until the military began doing similar studies. Anyways, I am not a dogmatic Peatard.I get that sometimes good things need to be gate-kept, but then the Peaters all paradoxically become the philosopher kings which theoretically would be health bureaucrats, and would be despised by the true P-rol-eat-arian.
I think Peat is an analogue of Pythagoras; there seem to be basic levels of initiation and authority even in the online sphere, clearly... isn't it all mostly online though?
-
@Corngold I don't agree with everything Ray said. Though, through real life experience I can say he made my life better. That being said, I'm not sure what your argument is
-
The thing that always gets me is the people that question Ray have never read or really listened to Ray. It's a sad state of affairs
-
I'm just saying occasional pufa is not going to kill anyone, and all food is poisonous to some extent just as Paracelsus said. I've read most of Peat's articles and it's helped me a lot.
-
@risingfire ,
Nutritionists have this power of persuasion. Some of them literally can persuade you to eat cows' poo like Aajonus if you listen to him for too long.
I think every piece of Peat's writings has been thoroughly chewded upon by many people because once you start reading him it is impossible to stop and then follows endless browsing of RPF and spending money on magical pills.
And Char... took it all away just by banning people, I guess many have withdrawal symptoms, some will be clinging on RP's ideas up to the end because ...Peat is the most misunderstood person in history
-
@Goodman
Interesting. I'm thinking sugar and carbs will have drawbacks but it's refreshing to hear a sane opinion about fruit, sugars, carbs these days. That said I think Peat's paradigm would be super-nutritive in like 1900 vs today with so much pollution and mechanized food production. But it is far more rational than carnivore, keto, paleo, etc. I don't understand taking supplements unless somebody is sick. I speculate that the alt health and homeopathic world benefits by inventing illnesses they can sell vitamins to cure. Yes it is a sick world but not only in a material sense.
-
@Corngold it was Peat who said stay under 4 grams of PUFA a day. And if you eat a high pufa meal take aspirin or vitamin e to negate the effects
-
Does aspirin actually combat the pufa or just combat the symptoms?
Forgive me... the chemistry is all very complex. -
Combats most of the inflammatory effects. Read this article by the man himself
-
@Corngold it combats both. Taking aspirin reduces free fatty acids in the blood stream that wreak havoc on your body. Aspirin allows pufa to bind to albumin in the liver to be excreted being attached glucuronic acid via urine.
-
@Jakeandpace don't stress this stuff is incredibly complex and takes most of us a rather long time to digest and learn.
-
I realise this is an old comment but wondered if you were aware of the following:
- In 2021, the same film maker released a short documentary on the artist David Dees, called Do You See What I See: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7hgzkLGFLe8
3 months after filming, David Dees died of cancer.
-
Like Ray, David Dees was also a vocal critic of Zionism and the political establishment.
-
Dees' friends claim that he was also targeted with break-ins at his property (Max Igan mentions in this video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/tuPIOlH6uUKX )
Do You See What I See?
From illustrating for Sesame Street to exposing the New World Order, this is the story of the controversial David Dees, unofficial artist of conspiracy theory culture. What sent him down the rabbit hole, and is there a path out?
Shortly after 9/11, a Sesame Street illustrator named David Dees is fired from his job of 13 years after telling to his boss that the world is being undermined by a nefarious cabal of shadowy elite. Jobless, but armed with his illustration prowess, David decides to use art to expose these clandestine plans and maleficent actors, going down a dark hole where only news from like-minded conspiracy websites trickles through. In the process he unwittingly becomes the official artist of conspiracy culture. At its best, his art is weirdly amusing, but at their worst, they are ugly, offensive, and often anti-Semitic in nature (the filmmaker is Jewish, and confronts him on this). The deluded ugliness of his art is dissonant with his offline life. He raises bunnies in his yard, sings to elderly people in hospice, and meditates daily on universal love. How how someone with a happy home life, talent, and commercial success fall so deep down the rabbit hole? Is there a path back out?- Another interesting fact is that one of the film makers had previously received funding from Borscht Corp
- Borscht Corp was directly funded by John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
- Knight Foundation President & CEO, Alberto Ibargen served on the Council for Foreign Relations
- Knight Foundation funds Center to Fight Online Disinformation at Carnegie Mellon University (the Center for Informed Democracy and social Cyber security iDeaS will study how disinformation is spread through online channels, such as social media, and address how to counter its effects to preserve and build an informed citizenry.)
- Knight Foundation also funds Trust, Media and Democracy initiative (other contributors: the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Open Society Foundations)
-
@energy-structure
sounds fake tbh. -
This is not about Ray, it's about this guy.
@energy-structure said in New "Mission" of RPF:
the same film maker
Filmmakers tend to take an interest in strange characters on their way down. Which may at first involve their way up. For what goes up must. It's not uncommon. Have you seen Collapse? Michael Ruppert later shot himself in head. But if you put him in an MRI machine prior the picture probably wouldn't be pretty.
You've got to be careful with the view you take and follow the road if the weather is grim. Or don't take one at all. Amusements are available, ride the tunnel of love or something.
David Dees died of cancer.
Rest in peace.
a vocal critic
The subject of critique usually won't mind. As long as it's constructive. Your body probably won't either.
