New "Mission" of RPF

@LetTheRedeemed There are multiple internet searchable people with the same first and last name that many suspect real life "Charlie" to have (based on images/threads on RPF). One of those names had some publically available criminal record or something but the other details didn't match to what we know about "Charlie".

In any case, he did finally rename the forum which is what we were asking for for a long time. But, it probably would have been better to just make a new website for Low-Toxin and keep RPF going rather than merge the latter into the forum.

no_somos_nadie

@AkJono

Mathew Crawford is a very clever guy and I think he calls it as he sees it. eccentric interests. Certainly. But don’t we all.

LetTheRedeemed

Dang RIP Jwayne

LetTheRedeemed

@Peatful ok I get it. I wouldn’t want anything shared that wasn’t already publicly shared. I didn’t know if I missed some big news lol

Peatful

@LetTheRedeemed said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Peatful ok I get it. I wouldn’t want anything shared that wasn’t already publicly shared. I didn’t know if I missed some big news lol

Thanks for your kind reply

Remember
This stuff IS public record

If someone wanted to investigate
The data is out there

Although
Honestly
I wouldn’t waste my time

LetTheRedeemed

@Peatful ️

I definitely have my reasons not to support lifegivingstore and lowtoxinforum but I wish Charlie well so I don’t need to go looking for more things he may or may not be doing wrong

Corngold

@risingfire said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Basically going to try to change everything Peat has said

Ok, but can anyone seriously tell me where Roddy and Dinkov came from? How did they just emerge as Peat's two lone disciples from the ether? St. Daniel the Mexican and St. Györgi the Bulgarian spreading the gospel of Lord Peat?

Why are they pushing supplements?
Is the Peat triad a clever psyop run out of D.C.?

risingfire

@Corngold go away Charlie

Corngold

@risingfire
I'm mostly joking. Nothing against them, I think they're doing good work and are honest from what I can tell.

This is only to say the viewpoint seems to be that Ray was infallible, or that his messengers were, too.

Hearthfire

@Corngold

This really bugs me about the whole Peatosphere. There's no questioning allowed. If you point out errors or inaccuracies, people sperg the fuck out.

Corngold

@Hearthfire

True, this is one of my irritations.
It's a net positive overall because a lot of these ideas aren't supported anywhere else, and yes, obviously a lot of the science was from Eastern Europe and Russia and is dated and suppressed in the West, until the military began doing similar studies. Anyways, I am not a dogmatic Peatard.

I get that sometimes good things need to be gate-kept, but then the Peaters all paradoxically become the philosopher kings which theoretically would be health bureaucrats, and would be despised by the true P-rol-eat-arian.

I think Peat is an analogue of Pythagoras; there seem to be basic levels of initiation and authority even in the online sphere, clearly... isn't it all mostly online though?

risingfire

@Corngold I don't agree with everything Ray said. Though, through real life experience I can say he made my life better. That being said, I'm not sure what your argument is

risingfire

The thing that always gets me is the people that question Ray have never read or really listened to Ray. It's a sad state of affairs

Corngold

@risingfire

I'm just saying occasional pufa is not going to kill anyone, and all food is poisonous to some extent just as Paracelsus said. I've read most of Peat's articles and it's helped me a lot.