Posts made by ThinPicking

An autist with time on his hands.

(This is not insult. His book has some reasonable positions in it. And I'm sure he's a reasonable guy.)

@Hando-Jin

Words to the wise.

Happy Monday America.

https://youtu.be/dxMfg3wFzWA?si=6o0_9vSWbmhTBcSC

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

seems to be accountable to no one.

I wonder how one might go about cutting their balls off without collateral damage to SMEs. Maybe the bioenergetically charged can figure this out and make it popular.

Laws of Corporations and Other Business Enterprises - Harry G. Henn, John R. Alexander
"They are, mere adjunct, agent, alias, alter ego, alter idem, arm, blind, branch, buffer, cloak, coat, corporate double, cover, creature, curious reminiscence, delusion, department, dry shell, dummy, fiction, form, formality, fraud on the law, instrumentality, mouthpiece, name, nominal identity, phrase, puppet, screen, sham, simulacrum, snare, stooge, subterfuge, tool."

Did I mention aliens exist.

https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1432&context=flr

https://youtu.be/alUoE6tJP1w?si=s3thMwGa0aur9sDc

@C-Mex

Yes. High quality observations. I also made one. Here are some shoes in long grass I observed on the internet this morning. Maybe there is a link with the RPF situation. Fascinating times eh.

@tankasnowgod... get your arse over here. Pretty please.

Goodnight world.

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Weichman is associated with the Adaptive Brain Lab at Cambridge, which involves research using AI.

And? Statistical inferencing is not mystical woo until you call it "AI" and make wild claims about what it's capable of doing.

@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Trivialise and extrapolate C-Mex

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/chatgpts-ancestor-gpt-2-jammed-into-125gb-excel-sheet-llm-runs-inside-a-spreadsheet-that-you-can-download-from-github
https://www.hendrik-erz.de/post/why-gzip-just-beat-a-large-language-model
https://github.com/bbycroft/llm-viz
https://github.com/mattneary/attention

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Interestingly, information about Dr. Weichman seems to be missing from the Cambridge website.

https://www.abg.psychol.cam.ac.uk/directory/andrew-welchman

That's a clickable box bruh. And his LinkedIn is right there.

I'm just a humble moth C-Mex. Don't hurt me.

PowerPoints from the ivory towers of corporatism. The yellow brick road of utter stupidity.

@C-Mex

https://www.youtube.com/live/Ds0WasdieHo?si=bK82yoxNlJleffe_&t=375

Part of me wonders if he really is just dipshit enough not to see a causal link between the "information age", macroeconomic dumbfuckery, mitochondrial function and "mental health".

@Peatly

Bingo (to me). That seems consistent with the ZoomInfo entry coming from their side.

Also lol.

"Use this collection as a test-bed to explore options for metadata, computational analysis, ethics and rights issues."

Paddington. It will take a little while for me to get my brain to play ball on this. But I and it will.

I'd like to say something useful about where volume status and blood pressure intersect. For is "high blood pressure" really high blood pressure, if the patient has issues with volume status.

In case anyone else is inclined to imply I'm here for "distraction". Budding investigative journalists. Crack on if you want to.

Dropping back in for a spot of low effort analysis.

Seems likely to me "Charlie Mathers" is a pseudonym he adopted somewhere between supply chain management and trust issues. If I were in business and drop shipping I might consider doing the same thing. Although personally I'd rather get chummy with a supplier and actually Trust them.

His "FTC mandated disclosure of material connection" reads reasonably (for anyone still able to see it, which everyone should as it's supposed to be "clear and conspicuous", but that's a minor really). It alludes to "my company" and names it. And the agents of that are in the public domain as they should be. I have to give a man props for obeying the law, just about.

I really don't think there's much untoward going on with this guy, beyond stupidity, obstinance and a spot of pride (no offence "Charlie", we all get there and we all have to escape, again and again probably).

I can't explain the schizo appearances of those images and don't care enough to speculate. Meh.

As for the ZoomInfo thing. Potential sources have been have been painted. The "Cancer Research" thing pinched me in particular. But for all I know, someone in Cambridge has simply been paying attention to that place, and stored it in an Outlook contact entry with their address. I have no idea really. But if it's that, good. Let them read it. And weep. For you can't hold the tide with a broom.

And the Garrett fandom, I think he's just a bit of an opportunist himself. Garrett's "popular", he's a "believer", he has a "new" "way" and he's "alive". So "Charlie" jumps on the bandwagon, convinces himself he's feeling better and thinks he can shift some product around it. "Peating" wasn't working for him but made a buck or two. He couldn't separate the noise in discussions or simply ask for help. To be fair to him there, I'd rather figure it out myself most of the time. But I'm careful to correct my cardiac tone before I try and use my brain, and I have no idea the extent to which that human's been failed in life. It matters.

@C-Mex

Love you too C-Mex.

@C-Mex

Your visceral reaction doesn't indicate you're ignoring anything. And I'm not here to win a popularity contest.

Over to your sleep and subconscious. God be with you.

@C-Mex

I didn't say he was. A video of a man at a podium is not that.

You need to calm down in order to think.

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@ThinPicking

It certainly is related but I somehow get the sense of topic dilution/diversion going on where you offer a two-minute summary (of the American Revolution) somehow suggesting it covers the same topics as the eighteen minute video I linked which contains significant historical facts about the CIA and secret bioweapons development that feed into my hypothesis about this whole thing. People, please watch the longer video.

Keep your alans on C-Mex (that's London humour). I offered the fundamental part of the pitch from the person you brought in to the thread. He's right.

Just have a think about how you intend to change those things. If you propose to lobby representatives to legislate. Does it not stand to reason that existing legislation should be examined in the process. What exactly is it that makes a man untouchable. And how can they learn when they are so.

A talking head on Twitter or YouTube is unlikely to be popular in attempt to point this out.

@C-Mex

It absolutely is the same topic C-Mex. But you're absolutely entitled to conclude I have the wrong end of the stick.

"I think it gives a better understanding of why and how the intelligence agencies and state dept are intertwined with the healthcare system and health research through vaccines (and bioweapons)"

All of it is done under corporate labels. Which is why you can't touch any of the humans beings responsible for it.

@C-Mex

The first 2 minutes and 30 seconds of his original campaign speech is also a pretty good summary. Because it happened again. And no one did anything about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsuLBPjdt-w

P.s. I'm sorry about some on this island. To be continued.

Good day Ms Paddington.

Obviously the vasculature is a vast subject to try and trivialise. And obviously any attempt from me is going to be bent for fluid balance and dynamics.

Meanwhile @Amazoniac, @Peatly and @LLight (should they arrive) blew my mind on a regular basis on these subjects in the bad place. Hopefully they also have something to add. As does your intellect with a side of heart.

Obviously it is also Friday night. Therefore I will be back tomorrow.