The Future of Europe
-
@Martiño You are right. Europe needs identity, which in itself is no problem. Europe is in many ways the birth of high civilization and culture, so there is plenty to be proud of.
You are right about the EU and it serving to make us a puppet state of the US. We are absolutely spineless, the US blew up the Nordstream in front of out eyes and we did absolutely nothing. I believe in a strong Europe, originating from Central Europe. Germany as I see it is Europes only hope. May they rise again
-
@NateHiggers I agree that it is concerning, but it needs to be, else nothing would happen. The White Race will not revitalize without fighting for it.
The most important thing you can do is to spread your ideas within a sphere you can influence, that is, people you know in real life. Though it feels nice, nothing will ever get done posting about white excellence in an echochamber of people who agree with you. You need to influence people you know in real life.
You need to be an example for people in real life, and they will look up to you. You need to be a powerful personality and influence people onto your side. Can it be uncomfortable? Will you have people who don't like you because of it? Of course, but that's part of the struggle; nothing good comes easy.
Focus on influencing people around you in real life. All else is effectively a waste of time.
-
@NateHiggers AfD's rise is pretty organic from what i've seen, it's just their ties to Kremlin that is a cause for concern.
-
@wamantah Ties to Kremlin? Have not heard of, will check out
-
@NateHiggers Germany is the engine of Europe ( car industry analogy ). The potential that beats in every corner of this continent has no limits, if you have the culture and the history, you already have everything. But the steps must be done carefully because these proto fascists solutions that are popping up are just another trap.
About the USA satellite we are... In my opinion it all began after WW2. The tastiest cake to be split between Americans and Soviets...
-
@Martiño It was indeed split after the Second World War, but the plan for the new world was well underway before Hitlers Germany. Him being a mere reaction against it, one could say.
Take a look at how pro-European politicians are treated by the MSM today, Victor Orban being a good example. It is almost unbelievable that a nation wanting to remain a nation, is outlawed. From an observers perspective, this should beg the question as to WHO is against Europe being nationalistic? Who benefits from Europe not being nationalistic? Everyone with half a brain should be able to figure out that the benefactors of this sweet deal is certainly not Europeans.
-
@Martiño Disagree.
The EU in its economical sense is absolutely crucial to European states in order to resist China/USA/Russia's spheres, Ceteris Paribus, i.e. leaving all political matters aside.
Reforming EU and maintaining the EEA, alternatively another form of the OCA (Optimal Currency Area) theory in practice is the key to prevent a sharp economic downturn and to have one thing less to worry about.
We can all agree that EU as a political entity is corrupt and hostile to the white, working-class European but removing it altogether makes no sense in my eyes. It's a hastily-made opinion, coming from a standpoint I however very well understand.
-
Europe needs to fix its demographic crisis by stopping the disordered and evil use of contraceptives, as well as simply focusing on the family. This would all be a byproduct of repenting and returning to the Catholic Church.
It’s quite ridiculous to complain about an immigration “crisis” without realizing the main reason so many immigrants are coming is to fill the void in jobs that should be filled by young people. See what would happen to the economy if you had no immigration and did not increase birth rates.
-
@dan-saintdominic I hear this quite often, and I believe it to be a simpleton take. Yes, Europe needs to fix its demographic problems, but how should one fix it, and why did we end up with these problems?
Contraceptives as you mentioned are important. Further, I believe the "liberation" of women, putting them in the work-force, devaluation of our currency, more expensive housing as well as the youth spending their years in institutions like universities, etc. is at the societal root of our demographic problems. One could also say that the general health of the average European is not what is was 100 years ago, with a lot of ultra processed food lacking various nutrients, combined with the always-online stressful lives of the 21st century altogether making us less fertile.
You may find it ridiculous to complain about immigration, but the question you should want to answer is why are people not having children? The reasons, I believe, is listed above.
Next, is it possible to solve this without immigration? Yes.
Would it not be just as economically feasible to invest in the current generation of could-be parents in Europe? What about offering low-interest mortgages, where every child up to 4 children, the government would eliminate 1/4 of the mortgage? Seeing that these children one day will enter the work-force and pay taxes, it's a net positive for the government in the long term. The problem is the myopic belief that population stagnation and decline can only be solved though immigration. We humans are literally replicatory machines, capable of replicating ourselves. The solution of course lies in giving us humans the possibility to replicate ourselves, not enslaving man and female forcing our lives to be an institutionalized journey.
By the way, Immigrants are not free either, and they too have their price, in the form of integration, education etc. A lot of immigration is not what one would call productive immigration either. They bring their entire families, and I'm talking about several generations of family to the country they emigrate to. This is not economically feasible, because old people don't work. The females that emigrate to western countries are also stay-at home moms, so they don't directly contribute to the overall productivity in the country either, besides making non-euopean babies, and eating up tax money, which is what we don't want.
So, why do the governments of Europe push immigration?
-
@NateHiggers jooz.
-
@dan-saintdominic This is utter nonsense. There is a high youth unemployment in Italy, so there is no need to import braindead unskilled scholars. There will never be a need for any third world migrants as they are always net negative for both the economy and the society. The mass immigration happens because of white guilt. We need to ensure that being against migration is the moral high ground.
Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.
Ignore, judge, overcommit.
-
The "le jobs" argument is my least favorite one to hear. Europe was crumbling under the weight of its own homogeneity, and needed to mass import browns to save the dying labor force. Brilliant!
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe I agree with this sentiment. Speaking for Ireland, we are loosing our "Irishness" by means of dilution. You are more likely to meet a foreign national on the streets of Dublin than a native, and it is clearly accelerating
-
Fire against fire... Time and time again, I tell this statement from under the fold of history's balance and pendulum:
May the strongest win. -
@DairyMilk I believe you, and can say the same about Oslo. Go downtown in Oslo and count foreigners vs native Norwegians, it is absolutely abysmal. I get the feeling of being a tourist in my own country. Foreigners already make up 33,4% of the population in the Norwegian capital. and it is most evident when looking at the younger generations, where the distribution is 1:1.
-
@Hitler
Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societiesThis wonderful lady sums it up the best
"Without that transformation, Europe will not survive.."
-
what do you think of the possibility of war against Russia? Every nation in Europe is planning to arm itself like crazy in the next 10 years. I think that America would like to take out Russia, weaken them, or did a regime change, but they want Europe to fight the war, and best time would be right after the war with Ukraine is over, and their resources are depleted. Even if not in the next 10-20 years, I don't see how there isn't going to be a major conflict with them and possibly with China on Russia's side and its likely that is going to take place in Europe.
And if something like that occurs, who is going to fight? won't be the migrants...
-
@bronzeagepeater If it happens, it will be the final blow to Europe, especially demographically. It's funny how the media went from "Russia is done / The west sanctions Russia to its knees!" to "We must prepare for war with Russia / War with Russia likely within 5 years" kind of thing. If you ever wonder what's next, just look at what they pushing
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe Look at the German Turkish worker program. Over 2 million immigrants into the workforce at the almost same exact time that Germans adopted contraception- a rejection of the Catholic faith. And on Italy, the immigrants take jobs below the legal minimum wage in America and displace native, I wouldn’t be suprised if it’s the same in Italy. Also the average age in Italy is almost 45 which you didn’t address.
-
@Hitler Look up the German Turkish worker program, which happened at the same time Germans were adopting contraception. If no one was hiring the immigrants then they wouldn’t be coming as fast as they are. It’s the same thing here in America, immigrants get hired at a cheaper price than natives.
