Peating in poverty
-
-
@LetTheRedeemed said in Peating in poverty:
You are paradoxically the intended product of capitalism.
*corporatism
Inherently self-compounding. Inherently self-incriminating.
(I'm not here to endorse theft but slight modification of law for gradual effect. Please continue.)
-
@ThinPicking said in Peating in poverty:
@LetTheRedeemed said in Peating in poverty:
You are paradoxically the intended product of capitalism.
*corporatism
Inherently self-compounding. Inherently self-incriminating.
(I'm not here to endorse theft but slight modification of law for gradual effect. Please continue.)
What modification, unto what effect? because, no offense, but theft is gay/weakness.
-
@LetTheRedeemed said in Peating in poverty:
no offense, but theft is gay/weakness.
In what realm do you think I would find that offensive. I agree.
You know what else is gay/weakness. Not being able to answer that question yourself. No offence. Really.
-
@ThinPicking I have no idea where this is going. I couldn't tell in your comment if you meant gradually lessening the crime of petty theft or not.
So, pretend I didn't address the theft as gay/weak (I genuinely was Not implying you were, I stated it for posterity's sake - clearly shouldn't have said "no offense").
I know your slap back is the moral code of anon internet parlance, but I don't know a single Amish, cowboy, blue collar worker, Mennonite, etc, who could've understood where you were going, and they are not gay or weak.
-
No problemo.
@LetTheRedeemed said in Peating in poverty:
I couldn't tell in your comment if you meant gradually lessening the crime of petty theft or not.
I did (in haste, apologies). As behavioural psychology would suggest a man armoured against recourse, physically or on paper, is liable to engage in petty theft. From a shop floor to a high rise. Tit for tat.
However I'm not using systemics to absolve anyone. Just thinking ahead.
Personally I think the Amish know exactly what's going on here. Which might assist them in remaining untouchable. Love em.
-
@ThinPicking hah deal. Thanks
-
You are neither intelligent nor entertaining enough to be writing more than a single sentence, and even that is stretching it. You'rea carbon copy of every guy on the internet nowadays, so you do not even have originality on your side. The fact that you're a chicken really does not have to be repeated in paragraphs of cope, everyone reading gets it.
-
shoplifting is le based actually.
-
@CO3
I’ll recommence this conversation in person. I’m in DFW, Texas. Let me know when you’re here. -
@LetTheRedeemed It's nice that you want to make new friends but recall that threats of violence are against the rules, and it's easy to read between the lines here. I'm not taking moderation action but suggest you desist, as even if you're not serious, chest-thumping is unneeded derailment. Don't let him get to you, it's not worth your effort or time.
-
@NotShanalotte I guess I could see how it could be interpreted that way, but to the contrary, I just have a belief that sincere conversations should be in person, and that usually dispels the fear of another to the point you’d wish to attack with ad hominems or impatient arguing.
whether the other guy is trolling or sincere, personal conversations have resolved the situation for me…But, Thanks for the heads up, sometimes I forget that not everyone is a Texan yet
-
@LetTheRedeemed Hey, no big deal. As a mod I have to be as impartial as possible, it's just how it is. Heck, I didn't even know you're a Texan and I don't really disagree with your point now that you've said it.
Perhaps you could add a bit of Texan when you make such a reply? I have a lot of family in Wisconsin, and they can be polite to a fault, so something they might say in person would be "Hey, invite that guy to the cookout" indicating both hospitality but also that if someone would try to say something, they'd look like a major jackass. It would make your intention clear and might be a bit of fun too.
Thanks for a good response!
-
@NotShanalotte haha noted!
Doing a great job btw.
-
@LetTheRedeemed Thanks for the kind words! This is probably the first forum I'm actually happy to moderate, but it's still been awhile since I last moderated a forum so you've given me a nice boost.
-
-
@LetTheRedeemed said in Peating in poverty:
Fun idea: small game are traditional food sources for virtually all hunter gatherer societies. Get a sling shot and hunt whatever birds / rabbits are around you. You can clean off the feathers and fur in no time with a scalding water plunge and dowse in wax to then peal off… cut out the stomach/intestines and bladder, then throw the whole thing in an oven with potatoes/milk/whatever you can find. lol this would be awesome!
I'd expect synanthropic animals to be quite high in PUFA. Where I live pigeons seem to get fatter, dumber and less capable of flight every year.
-
@DonkeyDude haha word.
Maybe just bunnies…
-
Lol at this thread. It validates every prejudice I have against poor people. They are usually inferior and unable to gain a skill and live productive caring lives. Also, Germans should never attempt humor.
Another thing a poor person can do is to have a higher-fat diet. If you can get 30% of your calories from coconut oil, then you will be able to save quite a bit of money.
Put yourself on fire for peak energy metabolism.
Ignore, judge, overcommit.
-
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Peating in poverty:
Lol at this thread. It validates every prejudice I have against poor people. They are usually inferior and unable to gain a skill and live productive caring lives. Also, Germans should never attempt humor.
Another thing a poor person can do is to have a higher-fat diet. If you can get 30% of your calories from coconut oil, then you will be able to save quite a bit of money.
you're uncool
i dont mean that as an insult
but you're just not cool. you're cringe. you will probably think im attacking you or something. but when you are out and about and you see a guy with friends who is well liked and handsome and at ease, you might think to yourself how he got like that. it's because he doesn't think and behave like you. you might be "good looking" but I am 100% positive you aren't handsome. you are "rich" but you aren't elite. you're a pleb with money.
