What do you guys think of Trump now that he won
-
-
@Sippy said in What do you guys think of Trump now that he won:
@Androsclerozat +1
https://healthimpactnews.com/2024/trump-supporters-in-panic-mode-let-the-censorship-and-revision-of-history-begin-to-serve-king-trump/She will have little to nothing to do with setting policy. She will be supervising the staff. She did great as Trump's Florida campaign manager in 2016. Trump also chose her as CEO to manage his Save America PAC in 2021. She also worked for Reagan so she can't be all bad. Because of the stranglehold the cabal has had on us for the past 5 decades or more, Trump is hard pressed to find a "purist." (I left the Christian right for that very reason. TDS isn't exclusive to liberals. They wouldn't know a winning strategy if it bit them on the hindquarters.) Trump had to play the game too. Not everyone was willing or able to buck the establishment. Look at what happened to General Flynn, Steve Bannon and others. I get that some haven't yet figured out this 5D chess game, but maybe now would be a good time to get up to speed.
-
I do like your point about purity fetishism. It is a limiting factor on a lot of political thought today.
Nonetheless, demanding a "5D Chess" interpretation feels like a synonym for "mental gymnastics".
I would be shocked if Trump did something other than continuing to develop the metastatic cancer of the American systems' various capital sinkholes at the expense of the health and sanity of most of the humans there. It would be nice to be proven wrong but I expect not to be.
Your points to otherwise are largely rhetorical instead of analytical. And so they seem incorrect.
He may even grant some concessions and improve life in some fringe ways, conditional on something like war with Iran, that ultimately works as Iraq did to lower trust and living standards once again. As has been the playbook of his type for about 100 years now.
In either case, "the fire rises". Staying aware, conscious, while not abstracting away your particular existence, will be the most important thing.
-
@Rah1woot Keep in mind that there were no wars during Trump's first term. We had 4 years of peace.
Where is the rhetoric and I will try to elaborate, but it will be difficult to condense 8 years and thousands of hours of research into a few paragraphs.
-
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
@S-Holmes said in What do you guys think of Trump now that he won:
Keep in mind that there were no wars during Trump's first term. We had 4 years of peace.
I don't think this is true. There is ongoing drone warfare...Somalia, Yemen, probably Syria, Iran. Obviously all of our billions that go to Israel directly fund their wars on Palestine and elsewhere.
-
@S-Holmes said in What do you guys think of Trump now that he won:
there were no wars during Trump's first term.
You meant "no new wars"
-
@Androsclerozat Yes, let me rephrase.
Trump was the first president in thirty years to not start a new war. -
@S-Holmes Yes, but he continued the ones that he had. Maybe he had enough? This still makes him a criminal.
-
Since voting doesn't make sense, the only way to save a country is through honest intellectuals. The problem is that there are less and less, even though population as they say, increases. Mothers have a difficult time staying healthy, so the baby
, and I believe this leads to dumber generations.
In my home country, the geniuses that invented staff we use today were born in the countryside, in small towns in the best environment possible. The idea that we need plenty of stimulation from childhood in order for our brain to develop well is false. -
@Androsclerozat Ummmm, no. Not even going to rebut this. If anyone thinks he's a criminal they have way too much of a learning curve.
-
US Presidents and their wars:
https://x.com/TwinTowerCity/status/1855752984472543434?t=_0bWvyBa5DdxDDyKNGRDqw&s=19
-
@Androsclerozat Blackpillers are going in the crystals. We are going to win so hard
-
@onliest
As the media said years ago it will be through a new "big lie" though maga is a big lie in itself. -
Blackpillers are going in the crystals
None of those words are in the bible.
The idea that we need plenty of stimulation from childhood in order for our brain to develop well is false.
"Stimulation" might be a wrong term... there is nothing particularly developmental about police sirens in the city. Perhaps "interactivity" or "reactivity" would be better words. In the country these factors could be thought higher as people have a greater ability to modify their environment and have it respond to them. Giving a biological meaning to intelligence.
Since voting doesn't make sense, the only way to save a country is through honest intellectuals.
What to say here? I don't think that this is exactly right. Or perhaps the wording is not exactly right. What is most necessary is the "productive intellectual" or "generative intellectual". The Proletarian Intellectual, even, sharing etymology with "proliferate". Which is why Elon Musk for example is so eager to portray himself as being an engineer-type when the reality is less so.
No amount of brains sat in a dark room, ingesting news through the various public channels, will arrive at a correct conclusion, or produce something socially useful, As Mao Zedong puts forth.
One has to interact with the real environment and the real social conditions. And especially new "esoteric" local conditions (contrast with "exoteric"). Without any sentimentality, no "pills" black or white. The system that does this best will own the future. And so all falsehood is at a disadvantage. -
@Rah1woot The year is one! Heil Lucifer! The year is one! Heil Trump!
-
@Corngold You need to be clear of mind in the coming period of thought chaos if you want to survive
-
-
@onliest said in What do you guys think of Trump now that he won:
@Rah1woot The year is one! Heil Lucifer! The year is one! Heil Trump!
Very esoteric Christianity!
