Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.

    Bioenergetic Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    A Bioenergetic View of Bioenergetics and Forum Structure

    Meta
    9
    11
    1.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PissBoyP
      PissBoy
      last edited by

      I think there should be an AI powered tag generator for each post/reply and it could help group posts into tag specific heatmaps and the entire forum exists in this bubbly map of tags.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bradB
        brad @Amazoniac
        last edited by

        @Amazoniac Are you suggesting each of the quoted text should be a subforum?

        Hando-JinH AmazoniacA 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Hando-JinH
          Hando-Jin @brad
          last edited by

          Too many subforums is one of the many reasons rpf sucks.

          I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • skylarkS
            skylark
            last edited by

            I agree with OP. Higher information flow -> higher structural complexity. It's just the bioenergetic thing to do.

            Also how do I get to the Black Lodge subsection? I followed all the instructions but when I open my eyes I'm still in the phenomenal world.

            Good things are immeasurably costly

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • AmazoniacA
              Amazoniac @brad
              last edited by Amazoniac

              @brad

              Yes, but if you find it overwhelming, it can be simplified. Something along these lines:

              Health

              Nutrition
              	Proteins, peptides and amino acids
              	Carbohydrates and fiber
              	Fats and lipids
              	Calories
              	Vitamins and quasi-vitamins
              	Minerals: major, trace and ultratrace
              	Foods
              		Cereals
              		Confectioneries
              		Diaries
              		Eggs
              		Fruits
              		Legumes
              		Meats
              		Collagen
              		Vegetables (roots, tubers, leaves, and others)
              		Mushrooms
              	Beverages
              	Culinary herbs, spices and seasonings
              	Dietary models
              	Cookware
              Light
              Sleep
              Physical activity
              All-things respiration
              Mental wellness
              Hormones
              	Corticosteroids (Glucocorticoids, Mineralocorticoids)
              	Sex steroids (Progestogens, Androgens, Estrogens)
              	Nonsteroid hormones
              Tests
              Afflictions
              Therapies
              Supplements (non-nutrient)
              Drugs
              Maternity
              

              Environment
              Case studies and logs
              The Greats
              Antisocial sciences
              Art
              Companion animals
              Junkyard

              I illustrated with the first, but you'd have to expand the other categories as wished and include what's missing. For some reason, parts of the text are appearing in different color or bolded, yet these weren't on purpose.

              The regular forum searches are unreliable to compile relevant posts on a topic because of the irrelevant results that appear in between.

              With simpler directories, we'd be relying on the tags system, and only part of members is fond of it; others prefer to navigate through menus. Those who prefer to search can ignore the subdivisions, pick a major category and the desired tags. If they're after random content, there's the page with recent activity. However, the persons who are into menus are discouraged without the existence of proper directories.

              But some standardization must also be present to better organize the content in relying on tags. Without a list to select from (similar to what was proposed earlier), it's common to have different terms referring to the same matter (example: thiamine, thiamin, B1, vitamin B1). An incomplete structure along with an erratic tags system is an issue that's better addressed early on.

              I now have a support page!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • I
                Insr @Hando-Jin
                last edited by

                @Hando-Jin I agree

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • SalemSaysS
                  SalemSays
                  last edited by

                  Guru
                  Would you prefer it be called the pro-metabolic forum ?
                  Does that make us professionals or maybe professors ?
                  What's with all the fat soluble hate it sounds like fat shaming to me but as for acronyms PMF doesn't roll quite off the tongue as BF then we could be BFFs works much better with formalwear

                  AmazoniacA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • AmazoniacA
                    Amazoniac @SalemSays
                    last edited by Amazoniac

                    I think that we're past naming, but for something unique related to metabolism, it could be Metabotropic Forum.

                    The way that the forum is designed (with a discreet search icon on top) induces people to explore rather than search. The landing page is not on all recent content and encourages navigation towards affinities, which is advantageous, but it's not divided enough. People have large buckets to dump their threads with minimal criteria.

                    A woman may have a relative in critical situation dealing with advanced cancer, browses the forum for hope, only to encounter:

                    • https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/368/cum-maxxing-the-holy-grail-of-cum/
                    • https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/44/thoughts-on-gelatinous-ejaculation/
                    • https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/619/dickmaxxing/

                    Without proper niches to contain these topics, people have no choice but to post them on grand categories and interests confuse.

                    • Forum > Bioenergetic Discussions

                    Compared to..

                    • Forum > Health > Sexual Health > Male
                    • Forum > Health > Sexual Health > Female

                    To make it worse, check the list of recent threads: only a minority are tagged (and without standardized terms). If you're horny and trying to procreate, it can be tricky to find information on sexual health from a sea of threads with different names in use.

                    A person may visit the forum interested in paintings, but what if the art category is dominated by music? It would be challenging to filter once the content piles up.

                    I now have a support page!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      peatyourmeat Banned
                      last edited by

                      too much thinking for a forum that costs 300$ a month and was made because of twitter community drama

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • L
                        Lipidfree @Amazoniac
                        last edited by

                        @Amazoniac Very good and rather pressing suggestion imo, unsurprising coming from a great poster from RPF. I personally like tags and advanced searches, but the present subdivision of this forum is lacking, especially if it was grow large.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post