Posts made by Truth

@Arvidivs On what I commented on this post, I know what I'm talking about, better than you for sure

I don't know Josua Kenyon( I wish him the best), if you think his physique and/or muscle volume is optimal in terms of athleticism, aesthetics, and perceived intelligence, you're wrong

"you're most likely a midwit resentful of people who pushed further than you"

It's you who is clearly being resentful and of limited intelligence at the moment, I don't "push", there's no point in "pushing", also i wish the best to others including those who do body building and have big muscle volume

Lolol "women opinion on your looks is completly gay to Care about", so that implies that according to you the opinion that matters is those of other men(free to you),

or just our own opinion, if it's just our own opinion according to you, why do the majority of people who do body building and try to have a big muscular volume, do it, just to look at themselves in the mirror regardless of other people's perception, so you think that if everybody wouldnt care about muscular volume and/or that one man would be the only person on earth, he would still do body building and try to have a big muscular volume for his own perception and/or for his own "health" and "energy"? Lolol nonsense

I'm attaching Joshua's images for reference:

@Arvidivs It's factual and elementary, beyond a certain volume of muscle relative to body size and/or bone structure, it makes the individual appear less athletic, less aesthetic, potentially less intelligent, you still don't know that you don't know

You seem to project your own tendencies onto others, I have no use for finding "excuses", specifically when I don't consider it sub-optimal, if you believe that there is no limit and that as much muscle as possible is optimal in terms of athleticism, aesthetics (from women's perspective, not the men who comment on your body), making you look intelligent, and/or that it can't reduce these attributes, you're wrong, you don't know that you don't know

"Pajeet" lolol you are ridiculous, i report you

@Arvidivs What's a cope, you coping? I'm not from India

@Aryan_Racist Hi, I suggest that calling it an "obsession" has a dismissive connotation and is not useful in many cases

Yet for a part of people the tendency to work out can be motivated by a feeling of lack of strength, lack of serenity, lack of aestheticism(head and body), lack of masculinity, among other things,

working out doesn't necessarily improve these aspects, and potentially for a part of people it reduces energy, reduces serenity, reduces masculinity, reduces well-being, increases the focus on the smallest detail of the body and the potential dissatisfaction and negative emotions that result from it

Beyond a certain muscle volume relative to our body, it can also make us look less athletic, less aesthetic, and less intelligent

@shedim Hi, from my experience, i suggest:

People can feel better in some aspect from emitting, such as feeling more "relaxed" specifically in the short term,
In the long term, emitting too frequently, relative to the person's capacity, can have negative effects, such as less energy, less serenity, less sovereignty, less well-being, more worry, more shame, more guilt, more impotency, a higher feeling of needing help from an external source such as "god"

Considering the way the idea of "Semen retention" is promoted on social medias and youtube, such as:

Certain words/ideas commonly used in a sensationalist and exaggerated way, such as "journey", "aura", calling each other "king", "these women are not worthy of your seeds", "keep grinding", "Brahmacharya"

The association with ideas such as "sigma male", with practices such as cold shower, the use of characters from religious books or people considered "high status" to legitimize the practice, the net effect in part seems clear:

Increased division, pride, feelings of superiority and/or disdain towards women and men who engage in sexual acts, the tendency to go against one's own instincts to follow theories which in part are potentially fictions, and less tendency to create childrens

In this context, it's anti-life, anti-unity, anti-masculinity, and can be seen as a potential psyop, at least in part

@Norwegian-Mugabe in my experience, i suggest Whether it's believing in God as "coping mechanism" or "seeking something higher", it can be the lesser evil in the short/medium term in a person's given environment and what they're exposed to that's useful,
In the long term, it's associated with a sub-optimal energetic state

I don't know if the majority of the "best" men in "history" were "Christian", it's possible that they achieved the best they could in their given environment, it is not a comparaison,

I'm talking about an optimal state that each of us could reach in my experience

As long as fear and submission(and potentially other negative emotions such as guilt and shame) are considered necessary and/or virtues in "god's plan", then achieving the highest degree of energy and potentially optimal Masculinity(in part sovereignty)is necessarily opposed to "god's plan"

@Norwegian-Mugabe That's why I asked you these questions, to find out if the meaning you personally give to "god" was only a thing that would have caused the manifestation of the universe, or a being with intentions, which seems to be the second in your case

@zawisza I have a message from "god" :

You're wrong.

@Norwegian-Mugabe From my experience, I suggest that what matters most is that we reach the highest degree of energy and well being ourselves and potentially the greatest number of people, are these questions about existence associated with a higher degree of well being in the majority of cases, from my experience it is not

Is it necessary to ask these questions in order to reach the highest degree of energy and well-being, in my experience it isn't, and tending to the highest degree of energy and well-being can commonly be associated with a cessation of these questions about existence

@Norwegian-Mugabe I'm not a "Christian",

I wasn't implying that reasoning can lead us to a higher degree of feeling oneness with "god" or of being "god", I was simply saying that in the majority of cases (of people I've observed) belief in "god" is associated with sub-optimal ideas, which arouse negative emotions

@Norwegian-Mugabe

From my experience, I suggest that "god" in the majority of cases is a feeling and/or feelings associated with ideas,

the higher our energy level,
the more we feel united with everything, the more we feel united with "god", or even that this unity we feel within us, and of which we are a part, is "god" or "divine" energy, to the point where we no longer perceive it as something "greater" or external to us

We can also experience a certain degree of masculine energy, which is associated with a high enough degree of sovereignty, fertility, power, free of any negative emotions, where we feel we embody the energy of life creation, we no longer think of all the potentially sub-optimal ideas associated with "god" that arouse suboptimal emotions, we no longer think of "god",

we feel that we are "god" (in this second state, the feeling of "divine" energy is felt individually, rather than as part of everything)

@zawisza Lolol, it doesn't matter if we're not on reddit, or if my name is Truth instead of socrates

I'll keep asking elementary questions, Even if you please me not to

According to you it's obvious, keep reading and you'll potentially realize that there are aspects and nuances of his idea of "god" that aren't necessarily mentioned or explained in the initial post

Lolol it's you who comes across as a fanatical buffoon who tries to label people who ask questions about "god" as "heretics"

I don't care about "Christian theology" and "saints", I ask the questions to the guy who made the post

I block you

@Norwegian-Mugabe Which of these two is part of your idea of "god"?

@Norwegian-Mugabe No distinction between a being and a thing (such as a stone) in this argument? If there is, what contributes to the perception of "god" as a "being" rather than a thing (such as a stone) in this idea?

@Norwegian-Mugabe in this thought, do they imply or do you imply that this thing, is a being,(Being often has a personifying connotation), and potentially assumes that this "being" has intentions?

@Norwegian-Mugabe Are there any specific reasons why you perceive it as external to us, rather than partly within us or totally within us?

@Norwegian-Mugabe What do you mean by "greatest possible being", in terms of size, in terms of the value you personally give to it?

@Norwegian-Mugabe I'm going full elementary question, what meaning do you personally give to the word "god", what characteristics do you associate with it?

@Sugar Hi, from my experience, it seems that some of the people who watch body buider videos or anime such as Baki the grappler think that this kind of muscular volume is aesthetic, and the manifestation of a high degree of "Masculinity", athleticism, specifically some of the teenagers who base their standard on these things

@Bob-Thedestroyer Hi,

from my experience, I suggest that if we enjoy what we do, and/or that we know from experience or instincts that the action and its result will benefit us relatively to our state and the degree of energy invested, we need 0 discipline to do it

discipline is not a virtue in itself, and it can commonly be a net negative, and be associated with a lower degree of energy, relaxation, well-being, sovereignty, and a higher degree of conformity to the ideas and/or expectations of others, even when it is not optimal for us

There are many examples, both in humans and animals, where little movement and/or less movement relative to others is associated with a higher degree of energy, relaxation, well-being, growth, longevity, fertility