Posts made by Hitler

You legitimately must be brain dead if you purchase an $80 solbrah t-shirt

@nate I can vouch for baking soda, that's all I ever use if I need to.

My crib

@MK top tier reply, thank you for sharing.

@raytreats Can't tell you why this happens, though whenever I had that problem I would just use a little bit of coconut oil on my hands. It doesn't solve the problem, but it helps in the short term

@interpsychic Stumbling upon Ray Peat's work drastically changed my life. The comparison between myself now and 2 years ago is almost unfathomable.

Most sports seem to improve quality of life as long as its not overbearing, at least from what I've seen. Same goes with (most) combat sports

@SolisMack stop watching porn (if you do), also stop jacking off

@NoFapPeating This. Spend as little time on the internet as possible, don't play videogames, dont watch porn, etc. Improves quality of life more than any diet could.

@WilliamBlake newfag spotted...

Kek just means lol

Interesting post, thank you for sharing Nate

Every true Peater must watch Triumph of the Will at least once in their life.

One of the most important threads on this forum, shame there are so few replies.

Some of my OC

@buckminster Thank you for the context.

Ray Peat is simply wrong in his interpretation. I am not so much concerned about the origin or purpose of the original IQ tests, because its a century later and the accuracy of them has improved significantly. We know that modern IQ tests do not have any "embedded cultural\ethnic discriminatory content" (as anti-IQ proponents like to claim), e.g. there is no "cultural bias"in a logic puzzle or a question that involves 3D spacial reasoning.

I think it would do you good to actually read some of the literature on Racial Science to understand it fully (if you would like some resources I would be more than happy to supply some), rather than just citing a couple quotes from Ray Peat and calling it a day. He is not right about everything. I know that because I have interacted with the literature in this field for quite a long time, and I am very comfortable with the content and its conclusions.

I feel as if you and Ray Peat are attacking this not from a pure scientific reasoning standpoint, but rather first taking the moral "anti-authoritarian" stance, then deriving your conclusions to mold with that view. Scientific fact and ethics have nothing to do with each other in this topic: racial differences in IQ , psychopathic behavior, life-history strategy, etc. are very well established, but of course moral claims are not derived from these facts; they are in two separate categories.