Posts made by Mauritio

@Mulloch94 said in Methionine/Cysteine restriction increases longetivity AND energy expenditure:

@Mauritio said in Methionine/Cysteine restriction increases longetivity AND energy expenditure:

Thanks.
I was tryign low fat, low protein yesterday as well.
And I feel like restricting two macro-nutrients is too much. not sure if I could handle that long term. If almost all you eat is carbs, you probably run into satiety problems down the road. Carbs just arent that filling IME. But maybe it would get easier over time, as the animal studies show a shift in substrate utilization towards carbohaydrate oxidation, so maybe the cravings are transitory.

I have noticed I don''t crave fatty foods as much when I take pyrucet. I'm thinking the more you increase glucose oxidation, the less you fatty foods tasty. However I'm not sure the same can be said about protein.

It might be true. Im on day 3 and I crave protein slightly less than on day one, certainly not more. The studies show that when you restrict protein, you increase carb and fat oxidation. Fat actually more than carb.

This is the 30 year old study that a lot of people have mentioned. In which there was a 43% increase in life span in rats.

The researchers make some obervations that are hard to reconcile with some parts of the bioenergetic viewpoint.

They measured GSH and GSSG levels and they were through the roof. In old mice GSH was 278% higher than in old control mice. Now GSSG did not change, meaning the GSH/GSSG ratio increased a lot.
Since the GSH/GSSG ratio is a proxy for the NAD/NADH ratio and for how oxidized the organism is, the mice should be in an extremely reductive state- yet they lived a lot longer and are healthy.

The only place where GSH decreases was the liver and kidneys.

They also found that these changes were present as early as 2 months into the diet. While other research suggests that it might take 2-4 weeks for those changes to happen. I'm not sure if those changes would also occur on an intermittent approach, but I read there was a study on that, I just havent found it yet.

• https://www.sci-hub.wf/10.1096/fasebj.8.15.8001743

Interesting study In humans,showing increase of FGF21 6-fold after seven days. Diet was 9% protein , 71% carbs, 20% fat.

• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5004939/

Anybody interested in this diet, should listen to the first 15 minutes of this pod with ray. dropped some gems.

He mentions mTOR inhibition as the major MoA of MR, which I have only sparingly seen mentioned in the studies.

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZCgpw6_sRA

<img src="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7911310/bin/biomedicines-09-00130-g002.jpg" alt="An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is biomedicines-09-00130-g002.jpg"/>

i think it makes sense to look into the differing methionine and cysteine contens of foods.

For example milk and milk products have a lot less of those amino acids than meat. So you can eat a higher amount of cheese, yoghurt or milk, as compared to meat.

But even amongst cheeses there is a big difference in methionine content. Parmesan for example is very high.

For example : if you ate cheddar or mozzarella cheese instead of parmesan you could eat almost twice as much and still get the same amount of methionine.
If you ate feta you could eat almost 3 times the amount comapred to parmesan.
And if you eat cottage cheese you could eat almost 4 times as much.

So if you eat the right type of protein like milk and find a low methionine cheese you can make your life a lot easier while still eating resting methionine.

Another good food is, Cocoa/ Chocolate. It's low in methionine, moderately high in cysteine and low in tryptophan. I think it is also a high quality protein for anabolism, haidut posted a study on that IIRC

Heres a good list:
https://fitaudit.com/categories/mlk/methionine

Egg yolks seem to be a lot lower in methionine than whites, another reason to discard the whites:
https://fitaudit.com/categories/egg/methionine

This site even shows the cysteine content:
https://cystinuria.org/methionine-levels/

Thanks.
I was tryign low fat, low protein yesterday as well.
And I feel like restricting two macro-nutrients is too much. not sure if I could handle that long term. If almost all you eat is carbs, you probably run into satiety problems down the road. Carbs just arent that filling IME. But maybe it would get easier over time, as the animal studies show a shift in substrate utilization towards carbohaydrate oxidation, so maybe the cravings are transitory.

@Mulloch94 said in Methionine/Cysteine restriction increases longetivity AND energy expenditure:

Reply

Nice, ice cream has only about 2g of protein per 100g. So that is good thing to consider.
Did you notice any issues with libido or muscle strength?

I'm wondering about craving too. Im sure you were craving meat at some point , then wouldnt that be a sign that your body needs it ? Not sure, but that would speak for the intermitten approach as well.

@Mulloch94 said in Methionine/Cysteine restriction increases longetivity AND energy expenditure:

This is interesting research, I'm glad it's being discussed here. Anecdotally, when I was doing protein restriction a couple years ago I actually felt very good while doing it, and I wasn't even on thyroid during this period. I came to the conclusion that the "low-protein" aspect was more beneficial than the "low-fat" aspect of it. Though I'd imagine they both synergistically aid to some extent.

What set me on that path was stumbling upon some studies that suggested low-protein diets can reduce CRH and ACTH output, and thus quiet that negative feedback loop of stress hormones. I couldn't go long without eating because my liver was malfunctioning and not holding glycogen well.

The low protein diet seemed to stop (or slow down) the gluconeogenesis and subsequent stress response, as I wouldn't get the low blood-sugar "shakes" anymore, however I ran into a new problem of never seeming to get full. I was basically always thinking about food, even after eating. I guess because a almost pure carbohydrate diet doesn't really hit that satiety factor as much as a higher protein diet does, idk.

After successfully implementing thyroid into my regime I can handle higher protein much better, but I do believe a low-protein diet can partially alleviate many of the main issues associate with hypothyroidism if you can stick to it. I'm not really interested in going full low-protein again, but it would be nice to find a complete list of all the high methionine foods, because avoiding methionine and cysteine would be something I'd do, along with tryptophan.

If you dont want to go full low protein, maybe just 2 days a week is doable. If you look at image (a) in the post above, you can see that even 2 days a week at 5% protein caused FGF21 to more than double. And 5% might not even be necessary in rat and the human studies they mostly used 10% which is about 50-75g of protein for most people. Although that sounds more than it is.

How much protein and fat did you eat during those days?

Intermittent protein restriction might be a thing and reversed diabetes progression in this study.

They had one group that ate: 3 days low protein, followed by 4 days of a normal diet. And one group that ate 3 days low ,followed by 2 days high, followed by 2 days of normal protein. I think the most effective low protein concentration was 5%.
In terms of effects the 3-2-2 diet was slighlty superior the 3-4 diet. So a high protein window does not "ruin" the benefits of the previous low protein window.

This image is interesting since it shows that even a single day of a low protein diet per week might be beneficial. But the more days the better ( at least up until 3 days/w, they didnt test for more)
In image (b) you can see that the 3-4 and the 3-2-2 diet resulted in about a 10-fold increase in FGF21 after 13 weeks. That is the biggest increase I have seen so far.

They looked at continous protein restriction and while that caused weight loss and was good for diabetes it seemed to cause liver abnormalities (high triglycerides, high liver enzymes,...), so that is weird. Maybe 5% was too low continously?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095927321008033?via%3Dihub

• You can also go too low in methionine. Going as low as 0.1% in M ,resulted in death at least in many mice

"The following year, Miller et al. (80) examined the effect of MR on longevity in postweaning female BALB/cJ × C57BL/6J F1 mice using a lower concentration of methionine (e.g., 0.1% versus 0.17%). Many mice in the MR group died of rectal prolapse, so the methionine concentration was increased to 0.12% at 4 months of age, and then again to 0.15% at 6 months of age."

• 6h hours is not a lot for a 5-fold increase! So even a short term exposure to MR should have a lot of benefits! Lets say eating most of your proteins during one time of the day. IIRC there was a study showing almost the same benefits when they only did 3 days of MR per week.

"The next important advance came with the demonstration that, within 6 h of initial exposure to the MR diet, hepatic expression and circulating levels of FGF21 were increased fivefold in mice consuming the MR diet (118, 130). "

• As Peat said cysteine is also to be restricted!

"A second line of evidence comes from studies showing that adding back small amounts of cysteine to the MR diet reversed the diet’s induction of hepatic FGF21 but did not abrogate the ability of the MR diet to downregulate lipogenic genes in the liver (130)."

"The addition of 0.2% cysteine completely reversed the ability of the 0.17% methionine diet to increase EE and reduce fat mass (130)."

• The concentrations of methionine and cysteine have to be dialed in pretty wel, to achieve the desired effect.
  Although in the human studies they mostly didst control for methionine content AFAIK, but only protein content, which was always around 10%, so that seesm to be enough to get at least some of the effects of the animal studies.

"Methionine concentrations above 0.25% produce very little response, concentrations between 0.12% and 0.25% are ideal for improving metabolic biomarkers, and concentrations below 0.12% represent deprivation and will not sustain life. Concentrations of methionine between 0.15% and 0.20% seem to provide the best combination of reduced adiposity without significant weight loss (Figure 4). "

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936953/

This study(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25133427/#:~:text=FGF21 therefore represents an endocrine,periods of reduced protein intake.) makes the necessary diet even clearer.
In indivuduals that ate the same carbs but differing protein(and fat) contents, they showed that only the low protein group had an increase in FGF21 of about 170%

So low protein, does work for increasing FGF21, but not nearly as well as high carb (and low protein). And it does work despite fat beeing at 52% of total calories. So itsnt impossible to increase FGF21 while eating high fat. I just suspect that high carb, low fat, low protein is the ideal diet for that.

Low protein,medium fat ,medium carbs: +170%
Low protein,high carb, low fat : +800%

This study shows that the type of carbohdyrate matters: sucrose is superior to starch, in terms of FGF21.

Eventhough the 2 experimental diets have on paper the same ratio of carbs, protein and fat, they have very different outcomes. The group that had a higher sucrose ratio in their carbs had a higher metabolism, much higher UCP and FGF21, lower triglycerides, etc...

This makes the results of the above mentioned human study even more impressive, since they ate a lot of starch but managed to increase FGF21 by 800%. It probably would have been even more, if they had eaten more sucrose and less starch.

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955286317301948?via%3Dihub#bb0110

@Mauritio said in Methionine/Cysteine restriction increases longetivity AND energy expenditure:

@DavidPS
Sorry for the confusion as well.
The 800% increase in FGF21 was actually from the high carb diet. And as the person in the video you posted explained, they ate pasta, bread, corn and drank juices.

Im going to look into that study more, mainly because it is human and the increase is so high.
Now compare that to the low protein study (also in humans) and they only had a 150% increase after 4 weeks.

So it seems high carb is more important than low protein!

This is actually an excellent study. Aswers a lot of questions.

Again: high carb, seems more important than low protein. And low fat (PUFA) is important, too.

They used the following diets:
High carb: (80 E% carbohydrate, 11 E% protein, 9 E% fat)
High fat: (10 E% carbohydrate, 12 E% protein, 78 E% fat)
Control: (62 E% carbohydrates, 14 E% protein, 24 E% fat)

The dfference in FGF21 between high carb and control is massive, yet the control group also ate a lot of carbs and the protein was almost the same, so the only factor that strongly differs is the fat content, which is 2,5 times higher in the control diet.
Leading me to believe that this is crucial as well: high carb AND low fat. If it was only the carbs than the control diet should have outperformed the high fat diet ,which it didn't.

This underlines what Peat said for a long time that: a high carb, low/medium protein, low fat is very healthy.
I think you can go higher on protein if it is gelatin. And maybe higher on fat if it is SFA ? Im going to look into the realtionship between SFA and FGF21.

Another thing we should look into is all the protein restriction animal studies.
Are they really low protein studies ? Or high carb,low protein?What is the diet of the control groups in these studies?

Btw fasting is not effective in humand to boost FGF21: "...an increase in circulating FGF21 concentration is not detected until after 7–10 days of starvation in humans ..."

• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220397/

@DavidPS
Sorry for the confusion as well.
The 800% increase in FGF21 was actually from the high carb diet. And as the person in the video you posted explained, they ate pasta, bread, corn and drank juices.

Im going to look into that study more, mainly because it is a human study and the increase was so high.
Now compare that to the low protein study (also in humans) and they only had a 150% increase after 4 weeks.

So it seems high carb is more important than low protein!

This is 2,6 dihydroxybenzoic acid :
<img src="https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/deepweb/assets/sigmaaldrich/product/structures/196/724/160fee6b-8d74-427c-b54d-738933a5fa1c/800/160fee6b-8d74-427c-b54d-738933a5fa1c.png" alt="2,6-Dihydroxybenzoesäure 98%"/>

this is aspirin (acetyl salicylic acid):

The structural similarity becomes even more obvious when you look at salicylic acid, which is where aspirins effects come and is called 2-hydroxybenzoic acid:

<img<img

What is not clear to me is why the 2,6 dihydroxybenzoic acid is more effective without the vitamins, since they should only enhance the anti-cancer effect...

Thanks.
So the way I heard it, the following order emerges in terms of effectiveness, from high to low (mind you, the experiments are still ongoing):

1. 2,6 dihydroxybenzoic acid
2. 2,6 dihydroxybenzoic acid + B Vitamins
3. Aspirin + B Vitamins
4. Aspirin + 2,6 dihydroxybenzoic acid

1. I could never tolerate gelatin or glycine powder, but I can use slices of gelatin that are meant for baking.

2. I notice that apple polyphenols are synergistic with gelatin in terms of hair health. Not sure why but I notice that there is less hair loss when I combine them then when I take each of them separately.

3. A Homeopathic remedy called "Schüssler Salze", number 10 for liver and gallbladder. Definitely helps with stuck bile. I had issues with that for 6 months , after less than a week of taking it, the issues were a lot less . Still taking 1 per day as maintenance.

4. The acupressure point for liver gallbladder on the head of your fibula also helps with stuck bile and bowel movements, at least in my experience. Not a game changer ,but a little boost.

5. Small amounts of oat bran reliably help with BMs.

This shall be a collection of random, little things that helped me. Things that I haven't made a thread on, but are worth mentioning.

In no particular order or importance.

@DavidPS said in Methionine/Cysteine restriction increases longetivity AND energy expenditure:

My diet includes a large amount of glycine. Yesterday I entered my food into cronometer.com and my methionine:glycine ratio was about 1:10. I suspect that the effect from low methionine and the effect of high glycine are additive. From 2023:

Glycine and aging: Evidence and mechanisms

Highlights
• The simple amino acid glycine extends lifespan in worms, mice, and rats.

• Glycine also improves aspects of health in mammalian models of age-related disease.

• Glycine is the acceptor for GNMT, an enzyme responsible for methionine clearance.

• GNMT also converts glycine to sarcosine, an autophagy-inducing metabolite.

• Glycine may prolong life by inducing autophagy and mimicking methionine restriction.

Thanks
Wasn't the increase in longevity from glycine "only" about 8%? That's quite far from MR which achieved between 30-40%. So this suggests that glycine isn't enough to mimic MR.

@Ismail said in A combination of vitamin B1/B3/B7 and aspirin, has curative effects on human mantle-cell lymphoma:

Anyone watched Georgi’s interview on the strong sistas channel? He goes into discussing his study in quite some depth:

https://youtu.be/skeXyC1_MVA?si=_Q4P6CPHqrW9ymm2

Thanks for posting , I was going to ask where he talked about it.
I'll watch it soon, but does he mention how he came on with using dihydrobenzoic acid ?
IIRC his methylene blue product contains benzoic acid ...