Posts made by Peatful

It’s sad to see

I do hope Garrett Smith is being a good friend to Charlie
And not using him

@Regina https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_manifestos_of_mass_killers

I am not here to gossip
Or be trite

With that

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/god-is-about-to-take-the-united-states-back-low-toxin-lifestyle-is-part-of-the-restoration.52684/

Genuinely concerning
On the brink of scary

https://www.reddit.com/r/raypeat/comments/1axp1w4/what_is_going_on_in_the_forum_and_is_there_a/

Nice objective assessment imo

For clarification

I never said there should be a suit suggesting
libel, defamation or slander.
Most states don’t allow that once deceased

How convenient

It’s around his work
His life’s work
Which his books and articles are protected by copyright law

Using his name on a domain
Then stating his work isn’t complete
That his work is wrong
That his ideas are toxic
Etc

Maybe not a legal issue?
Maybe is?

But it certainly is a moral problem

What an absolute piece of shtt

Save the world with your new theories
Great
Honestly
Great
Hope it helps many

But
Using a dead man’s name and legacy
The profoundness of his work
To say
Nah- no good

Im appalled by the many who support this injustice
Absolutely morally corrupt

@risingfire I see what you are saying.

Anyone who loved or respected Peat- would hopefully do the right thing- and take his name off the domain.
Especially when posting antagonistic “confusion” regarding said works.

@Light said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Peatful Not my job to stand up to woman-hating males. And it's certainly not your place to tell me what to do. Males need to clean up their own filth. Ps how TF do you know I didn't?? Sure AF didn't see you, or anyone, backing me up.

Mm-hmmm

@Light

the Perry guy used to say something. Pretty consistently iirc.

I’ve certainly said something.

That’s when I thought the RPF was a relatively healthy space.

Man or woman: acting like a fcking asshole needs to be addressed.
Say something yourself.
Don’t expect anyone to help you online but you.

@risingfire said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Truth it's interesting that he recommends following a low vitamin A will reduce all your supplements when in reality they are taking a large amount. The whole process sounds insane to me. "I don't feel well because 'I'm buffering' in the detox process.'' In the next few months, we should see results of people trying the low vA diet. I'm interested to see what the reaction will be on the forum.

I'm not sure Katherine has a large case to sue and win. I do not like what the RPF is doing to his legacy. TBD, I haven't liked it since Charlie became the "Law and Order Admin" in 2018 or 2019(I have since forgot). This is why I'm glad Ray's work has been preserved mostly his website. I reference it at least once a week.

You are not sure Katherine has a case to win?

Why do you think that?

This isn’t about libel. Defamation. Or slander.
This is about his work- protected by copyright law.

Would like to know your thoughts.

Thx

@Not_James_Bond said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Melora
@S-Holmes
@ilovethesea Yesterday Charlie said this;

After further consideration, I am retracting my stance on not allowing pro "vitamin A" studies
Thank you. You made the right choice.

It is still my position that if "vitamin A" is needed, it is such a small amount, avoiding it as much as possible will yield great results so that accumulation does not come into play. I have seen this work for myself, and many others. In the coming months as we move closer to a low toxin lifestyle the results will speak for themselves. I have no doubt, in the future, as a group we will understand that this was a great move as many will start reaping the benefits of this newfound knowledge.

Interesting

Im led to believe
Or assume here
That this is another subtle move to cover his ass
The first being the header change

Grant’s work (books)
Like Peat’s
Is “copyrighted”

To add a nuanced change
He may be trying to avoid any issues with Grant here

My FIL says (attached) is a violation
Understandably on a forum/domain under the mans name and work

Again
If anyone is close to Katherine
If she’s not aware
It’s worth mentioning

She may give zero shtts
And let Peat rest in peace
Or
She might want to exercise her rights for him
And let Ray rest in peace

 https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/the-toxic-ray-peat-diet-lifestyle-is-keeping-many-in-captivity-ray-peat-never-offered-a-way-out.52612/

@TheSir hey, I’m at work, and this is voice recognition. My father-in-law said a lot, but it’s lawyer speak. Something I’m not well-versed in.

I’m a big idea person not a detail person but I am sure a simple Google search would be able to clarify or define what you’re asking.

Spoke with my FIL briefly

Yes
This is why they have Copyright, Trademark and Patent specialty lawyers

From what I understand from my conversation
Charlie is breaking the law under a copyright law
He needs to either change the forum name-
Or
Take down all of Ray’s articles and newsletters

If Ray was incorporated
That would also be a second offense

I honestly wish Charlie the best
He really has himself in a bad position

Health to all….

Yes
Correct

The Ray Peat Right Again triteness was a CYA move imo

Thx for the updates

If I was close to Katherine
Say a Danny Roddy closeness
I would like to see if she is aware of this connection to his name

This feels not only unwell
Not only dirty
But possibly illegal

My FIL is a lawyer
Not his specialty
But I think I’d like to see what he thinks

Grieving with you all….

Short if any have interest

https://youtu.be/XroFXZKcMrw?si=Z4C3i8PcKfV6ZivY

@ilovecats

Why…
Does…
He…
Stay?

Honestly
Needs to tell them to fuck off.

Sure

1- I hate Epstein.

@risingfire they are not. I had private conversations with her prior to her departure a few years ago.

@Truth said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Peatful Hi, I saw your comment mentioning Charlie who changed the title of his post from "fructose is poison" to "exessive fructose is poison" after being severely debunked on the religious and experimental aspect of it

I didn't notice anything else for the title changes

Hello yeah there were several weird things going on simultaneously we all did our best I suppose

Gotta run

Thx

@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@S-Holmes said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Peatful I never saw this. What's the context for his cultists gonna cult comment?

I *may or may not have sent him a shitty email.

Oh yeah I totally know you did but why was something private being made public? I totally knew what was going on, but I was trying to put attention on it and get some direct answers from Charlie, which I never had

This is voice recognition because I gotta run