@IkeIkeforever amazing! thanks for sharing

@PEATCEL I do agree that the practical application of peaty diets aren't that crazy, but peating isn't just eating X food at X amount or frequency or whatever, its dynamic and constantly adaptioning to your own personal context. if you just have a static meal plan that doesn't evolve with you, then I don't think that's really peating. Definitely possible you've heard this but it bears repeating.

If I had to pin down specific guidelines, it would be something like
1 avoid pufa
2 eat a higher carb ratio to fats in a given meal
3 eat enough calcium to balance phos
4 eat protein sources with a balanced amino acid profile
5 get your necessary micronutrients in reasonable amounts

almost no normie is consciously doing 1-4

Instagram wooden cutting board zoomers are not peating just because they follow paul salidino and eat eggs and kiwis, or drink lots of coffee.

quantitative vs qualitative relationships

@PEATCEL Most peat egirls seem to be attractive idk, Im no chad but I think I'm pretty good looking by the standards of men on the internet lol, 5'11 190lbs at like 12% bf, good facial symmetry blah blah. The most beautiful peaty people will be the children of peaters, not the first generation imo

@Corngold try it and report back if you're still able to see. gotta crack some eggs to make an omelet right?

@Corngold no why would you do that lmao. sublingual aniprin would probably be the fastest route if that's ur goal

@alfredoolivas Gilbert Ling spearheaded the idea, he's who I'd start with. but anyone in the bioenergetic tradition tastily opposes the sodium receptor theory. Ling, Szent-Gyorgyi, Selye, and Warburg are all researchers whose work opposes the idea of a cell membrane with receptors. not sure if you're just new to the space, but this is something many "peaters" who go beyond simple dietary or supplement recommendations talk about, peat has talked a lot about it in interviews as well. If I remember correctly he even wrote to Ling in the 50s asking for career advice and talking about the difficulty he had integrating into the rigid platonism of academia.

if you search "membrane" or other related terms here you'll find plenty of clips of peat speaking on the subject
https://bioenergetic.life

@alfredoolivas I'm not saying that you dont have potentially valuable contributions to the metabolic approach to health. It's clear you are knowledgeable about granular aspects of biochem research. My point is that you are losing sight of the forest focusing on the trees. other users have already made this point, but it bears repeating. This is the entire point of abandoning the receptor theory of the cell.

even your point about me joking that certain books should be mandatory reading being labeled as "authoritarian" pretty perfectly exemplifies this tendency. Using definitions and minutia to obfuscate the whole is precisely the scientism I'm talking about.

wishing you good health!

@alfredoolivas you are clearly heavily indoctrinated into the scientism of the medical industry, you have a lot of unlearning to do if you want to engage with peats work in any meaningful way. In vivo and the gay science should be mandatory reading for this forum lol

@sushi_is_cringe XD

@alfredoolivas glp 1 agonistis also have the "side effect" of giving you cancer and shredding skeletal and cardiac muscle.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452302X24002869
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3920789/

where are you getting that ozempic stops the stress response?