Posts made by saturnuscv

@pannacottas No it was a popular quote-on-quote "supplier" from Xitter who advertises very heavily to peatosphere folks with testimonials, bloodwork, etc. I won't say exactly who because I got harassed by randoms last time I made this claim. I'm not certain what exactly I got but it was very disappointing compared to haidut's androsterone, or even just pansterone, and this product was allegedly dosed much higher than what I have used of either of those.

It seemed simultaneously to be suppressive but not really apparent in effect, possibly just grossly underdosed. Or, I suppose it's possible that it was just testosterone in DMSO, which seems most likely to be honest.

Less obvious response to a DHT product than I get from androsterone dosed lower by mg. Also more suppression.
Though, I'm fairly sure that the DHT product I got is a scam and has something else entirely in it.
Regardless, I would recommend androsterone for raising DHT. It does not seem to be suppressive, and in fact I get the impression that it elevates my natural production of steroids via its thyroid-like action.

just take some androsterone lol you will be fine.

@PunkinEater drop diphenhydramine for Cyproheptadine. Less side effects and better for fixing serotonin system dysfunction.

Low doses of Cyproheptadine. (Work your way up from .5 to 2mg /night)

Progest-E

Thiamine (recommend benfothiamine)

Egg Yolks

Cook with coconut oil

Fresh fruit

Oh no. “A former user.” I guess the gangstalkers got him for getting too close to the truth.

Fiancé typically experiences terrible cramps and pain far beyond what is normal. On a whim I decided to try administering 1mg androsterone to her (navel route) nightly throughout her cycle. This is following a post from @haidut claiming that <15mg of DHT is not virilizing for women.

This seems to have been a success, as she has now had a normal period without severe pain.

Previous to this, (about 3 cycles before) we began to try limiting her PUFA intake more severely and increasing sat fat intake, while also administering Progest-E. I’m sure has also helped, but it wasn’t until the inclusion of androsterone that she achieved seeming total remission of symptoms.

There have been no virilizing effects to speak of.

I suspect the andro has achieved this either by improving her liver function (and clearance of estrogens) and/or has simply lowered estrogen enough on its own. Either way, this is a pretty huge win for us and I thought would be worth sharing for anyone else who suffers from this.

@ilovethesea really hard to believe that a person can actually look like that LOL

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

I'll be suspicious of some more 'concrete' thing show up later related to this, because nothing has been posted here other than innuendo, and I fail to see how there is any connection to a Business address to any entity that may have searched it. My god there must be countless numbers of searches on every health-related website there is.. Ridiculous. I have to wonder now if they're going to try to create some kind of phony 'record' to try to explain how the Ray Peat Forum shares a business address with the Wellcome Trust.

This paragraph is, definitionally, “pre-bunking” btw. Lol. Did you have an account on RPF?

@C-Mex the fate of every dissident sphere is to be shunted down the path of schizophrenia, spurred on by bad actors. Happened to RPF. Happening here. I mentioned earlier in the thread that I’ve seen this happen many times.

Last thing I’ll say on the subject, but as someone who is educated in internet infrastructure, I think it’s very very possible that an AI is scraping user content and arbitrarily (or by some opaque parameter) deciding on a site’s address without any good reason.

In fairness, it’s totally possible that I’m wrong. I just really doubt it. Occam’s razor and all.

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Gibberish. I see another diversionary tactic, just like suggesting it is all about eugenics and global domination. One of the ways they try to discredit a group is by inserting grandiose ideas that sound ridiculous and even if there is a grain of truth would take forever to demonstrate and would exhaust the efforts of anyone trying to research it.

I'll be suspicious of some more 'concrete' thing show up later related to this, because nothing has been posted here other than innuendo, and I fail to see how there is any connection to a Business address to any entity that may have searched it. My god there must be countless numbers of searches on every health-related website there is.. Ridiculous. I have to wonder now if they're going to try to create some kind of phony 'record' to try to explain how the Ray Peat Forum shares a business address with the Wellcome Trust.

You are literally doing the exact “inject grandiose idea” thing you’re accusing others of. The address was posted years ago in a normal context and COINCIDENTALLY that exact same address is the masterminds of RPF’s downfall? And you think this is more likely/plausible than an AI agent mistakenly picking up that address in a scrape of the site? Dude, with respect, get real.

Likelihood of RPF being victim of some kind of conspiracy? Very possible. But this specific rabbit hole requires a very large degree of coincidence to make any sense. I just don’t buy it. But now the thread is irreversibly derailed and new accounts are about to start doing gematria to “prove” a conspiracy. Weird how that happens…

@C-Mex

@C-Mex they probably can scan the user content and their automated system is pulling that address and assuming it’s related to the forum’s ownership due to the link between the forum’s content type and that address.

Don’t get me wrong I do think there is some kind of conspiracy going on here but I think that connection to Cambridge is tenuous at best.

@zawisza said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@ilovethesea said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Looks like @zawisza may be on their payroll.

Of all the addresses in the world for ZoomInfo to get wrong, it somehow links Ray Peat Forum supposedly founded by a guy in Florida to Cambridge University Pharmacology, Wellcome Trust and the World Health Organization?

Sure Jan.

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

They scanned some data that linked it to that address in Cambridge, UK. The complaint is about getting one address wrong, 400 miles away.

If you had some desire to actually understand what's going on instead of jumping on the bandwagon and piling as much shit as possible on a guy you hate, you would maybe have easier time understanding this. ICANN has redacted organization's address for privacy since they used cloudflare for hosting so there's no way of actually knowing the true addrss. Zoominfo can only "guess" their address by maliciously scanning users' emails and scraping the web. It's enough for the address to be mentioned on the website; it doesn't have to be associated actually with the website (just like in the article I sent). If you had read the article I posted you would know how wrong they can be, how they refuse to change, and that it's not just one address as you try to imply.

Knowing how zoominfo works, we should expected the Cambridge address to be present somewhere in the forum. And it is:
IP3 Receptors: Toward Understanding Their Activation
Colin W. Taylor and Stephen C. Tovey
Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1PD, United Kingdom
Correspondence:Email: ku.ca.mac@0001twc
2010

Zoominfo found this address and assigned it to the website even though it's completely unrelated. Other "services" showing website info probably copied this from zoominfo since most of them scrape each other.

Everyone is getting caught up in the minutiae of this post’s tone or whatever, but he’s basically proved that the Cambridge connection is a “glitch” in zoominfo

@C-Mex how could you… you’ve just made her even more poisonol toxic…

@beastliboi “CICO” is a physical law that applies to closed systems, which the human body is not.

@Mulloch94 not aware of this. Definitely gives me pause.

My understanding is that nandrolone is pro-dopamine and does not convert to estrogen as easily as testosterone.

@metabolicmilk was going to do nandrolone base (no ester) and brew an idealabs style SFA/tocopherol/ethanol topical. This is after careful consideration that esters and carrier oils might add toxicity.

It’s funny that you mention MENT. The main barrier to this experiment for me is finding nandrolone no ester that ships to the US AND isn’t prohibitively expensive. MENT on the other hand is very easy and cheap for me to get, and has good reviews as a standalone alternative to test. I might use it instead.

My main concern with MENT is the conversion to methylestradiol that isn’t through aromatase. Methylestradiol doesn’t bind SHBG which is both good and bad. Good in the sense that it won’t crash SHBG, but bad in the sense that it’s more bioavailable. Like I said, I would be taking small amounts of exogenous DHT & pregnenolone and I would expect this to offset the estrogen somewhat, but it’s still something I have to think about.

Test in MCT for injections or topical test base + pregnenolone.

Better yet: daily nandrolone base topical (no test) + pregnenolone + DHEA and/or low dose DHT

Will be doing the latter soon. Supposedly nandrolone has positive effects on dopamine receptor density, more anabolic, doesn’t convert to estrogen, beneficial for hair. Adding the other hormones to cover for things nandrolone doesn’t convert into.

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:
"Mission" of RPF](/post/15434):

I guess what I'm getting bogged down in is the timing and methods used to do this and how it might relate to the upcoming US election, which seems critical to the outcome and future of all of this in these post-COVID times when so many critical issues are being raised that the powers that be find extremely inconvenient.

There are more than two choices in the upcoming election.

To expand on what I said earlier:
Charlie’s whole “Jesus is coming back to save America, not eating vitamin A is part of that” shtick is undeniably evangelical-esque at the very least.

The average person views evangelicals (IMO rightfully) as lunatics. However, at the same time they are incredibly useful to the present political establishment. Evangelicals also are dispensationalist heretics and as a result are the largest demographic bloc of Israel supporters in the US. Now it seems Thor Torrens is involved with Israel as well? And affiliated with a political administration propped up by evangelicals? Which is up to potentially be elected this year? Too perfect. Surely I need not remind of the connection between the pharmaceutical lobby and Israel lobby… (they are practically the same)

Frankly, this whole thing is clearly a sloppy intelligence/media complex op, done for obvious reasons by obvious suspects. I’ll refrain from elaborating further since it’s outside the scope of this forum and I don’t want to get myself or anyone else in trouble.

1. see threat to establishment narrative

2. torpedo it

3. redirect stragglers to politically useful narrative

I have seen this play out so many times with online communities for all kinds of subjects.