Posts made by ThinPicking

@zawisza

Please be nice. I realise that's a bit rich for my excessive use of (probably annoying) wit. But simply slapping someone with label isn't exactly constructive.

@questforhealth

Quite possibly q4h. I'm just keen for you not to alienate yourself from the plentiful, whole food sources that are quite easily accessible to most people.

It wouldn't have the form or taste it does if it were really as tainted as a lot of the dodgy information online might suggest. That said, I do most of my shopping at a "super"market and don't have the space to grow anything without significant effort and expense. So on the one hand I would say this.

On the other hand, I don't have any health complaints beyond an unquenchable thirst to learn things. And in my experience, they were always a result of my behaviour and choices. Which often stemmed from advice I should have thought critically of before acting. The learning addiction is probably perpetuated by my job and media consumption. It usually quiets when I chill out for a while.

What do you think @Cicero?

I think No.

At the end of the day. Nothing in this thread or elsewhere on the internet really matters to the sanctity of life. But the following.

Take a week off the internet in entirety and ignore the media. Balance your macro, bump your calories. Add salt conservatively and include plentiful sources of calcium. More simple carb than complex, more saturated lipids than unsaturated. Mind your breathing, raise your CO2. Moderate your fluids. And get plenty of sleep.

Visit friends, visit family. Laugh. Love. Joke. Be kind. And be peaceful. Spend time in nature and find some cute animals to pet. Leave the world behind for a little while.

That goes for everyone. Much love and God bless.

@questforhealth said in Soil health and its relations to plant, animal and consequently human health:

but our food lacks the very thing Dr Peat told us about

q4h, please be a bit more careful with your statements. You're making them to yourself before you make them to anyone else. This one in particular is a bit ridiculous.

Short food supply chains might be "optimal". But there's nothing to fear in the meantime. The chemist inside you is probably smarter than you. Just don't make pop-tarts and the like a staple.

Cheerio, I must get back to work.

@AkJono said in New "Mission" of RPF:

The entity in ? is shady, and shifty, and obviously hiding something by not allowing wayback machine to do its' magic.

And following his theatrical meltdown about "cyber attacks" in January, I'm unsurprised about that exclusion.

@Hando-Jin

Almost joyous. That Mr ddjd and his missus have resolved their "covid" conflict enough to have a spot of grey hair discovered as she cuts it be their current issue in life.

OFC the minus points for "toxic bile theory" are a bonus.

@AkJono said in New "Mission" of RPF:

hardcore Rhino mode

Thank you for assisting my inner world with a humorous frame. Good sir.

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/inverse-association-between-intelligence-quotient-and-urinary-retinol-binding-protein-in-chinese-school-age-children-with-low-blood-lead-levels.52867/post-991315

Whenever you're ready Mr "Charlie". Bygones be bygones and all.

Thank you Mr Mex. Interest has improved.

"identifying the seeds of misinformation within communities" they say.

But projection is ill-advised in the Babylonian Talmud and the New Testament. What a muddle they've gotten themselves in.

Democracy does not begin and end at a polling booth.

And the emperor has no clothes, that aren't written on pieces of paper in legalese.

God bless.

@Tahodama

Very well written.

Some very interesting questions in the @Tahodama. The internet itself is constantly in motion. A globulus mass without clear direction, growth or regression rate.

So it will be different inter and intra generationally. Meanwhile, people are tending to become wise to its nature and effect as they get older. Some tuning out, some doubling down, some taking breaks.

What the hell are we doing here. (With humour.)

Cry harder. This ain't Twitter.

@Tahodama said in Is being incel the "new normal" in 2024?:

Feministic women know exactly what they're doing when they utilize it.

Ditch a front and almost any man could have them ditching theirs and purring like cats within about 5 minutes. And tit for tat. Offence is always taken, never given. Painful as it can be for humans to get their heads or hearts around that, forget, and do it all over again.

"It's like this whole town. Big heads, small potatoes."

https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/incels-a-result-of-technology.48094/post-860673

I like your self ID take in the third post. We should probably stop lying to eachother. Maybe then we'd stop identifying with lies. And go to God.

@AkJono said in New "Mission" of RPF:

I think that YOU BOTH are on to it

I don't know about that Jono. This chap seems to have a problem with my position. And I couldn't care less at this point.

Nor for these wonky organisations and their desperate attempts to craft new bullshit.

@C-Mex

You're doing a spectacular job of discrediting yourself son.

Goodnight C-Mex.

@C-Mex said in New "Mission" of RPF:

What am I missing?

I'm not replacing Peatly in reply to you sir. But I don't think you're missing anything. And there really is something to be said of the phrase "just sleep on it". Which I apply a rule of three back to. Before I start scratching my head.

The excerpt from the posted report (which I've yet to read in entirety) suggests there may have been an authorisation, or at least a request to use information sent to the administrator. But if I were a wonk "data scientist" in Cambridge, operating under a corporate veil and somewhat void of humanity, I probably wouldn't hinge on that. If it went unresponded to.

@T-3 said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Please continue undaunted, without embarrassment, and without being dismissed out-of-hand by those advocating the “lone gunman” hypothesis (which is equally speculative to the “operation” hypothesis).

Hear, hear. Personally I don't know what a "lone gunman" hypothesis is. I do know that people must talk to one another, whether they like it or not.

Whether or not an organisation like "Wellcome Trust" or other fronts a "conspiracy" or gross ignorance and incompetence probably doesn't matter. For the outcome ought to be the same for anyone who doesn't want the world around them to burn.