Perhaps contemporarily as well. The (genuinely) misogynistic types are few and far between in reality. It doesn't seem fair to frame an "epidemic". But the internet is both a lens and a prism depending on viewing angle.
Posts made by ThinPicking
-
RE: Women, and Why Men are the Problem
-
RE: New "Mission" of RPF
A little more time ILTS. With a hundred, thousand lights, timing is everything.
-
RE: New "Mission" of RPF
Don't forget the heart Mr Europa. We could all do with a hand.
-
RE: Cancer
As a seasoned pot user I can sympathise. It's a vast subject for the variance in composition of herbs, isolates and vehicles to consume them. Literature search for THC/CBD isolates is tricky and they vary. To weigh that with literature search for "natural" product and turn it in to some kind of practical advisory... difficult.
And then there's the 21st century corporatisation of it. More context. More tricky.
-
RE: Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics
@Amazoniac said in Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics:
Did Brad..
There's always context. And an environment like this very noisy. Read one, and probably compulsion to read all. Understand one, and probably compulsion to understand all. We're just running at different clock speeds right now. Us three, and the administrator.
A new little angel hath arrived in the world recently. The aforementioned their custodian, teacher and love. His heart is elsewhere and must be.
I suspect it would pain them to mention it. As they appear to aim to please, for what appears to be all the right reasons.
A little time. He'll come back. And maybe shorten that rule down to one post. Still leaving an OP with the ability to scrub their own speech. Or share his reasoning.
-
RE: Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics
@zawisza said in Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics:
@Amazoniac I don't find your comment sensible.
It reads amusingly (thank you Gus) and does contain a valid inquisition.
But I don't mean to be antagonistic here @zawisza. As you probably know. I'm annoyingly humorous myself. As I try to stuff my brain and heart between any faux dividing line I can find. And figure out what's really pissing us off. Minor conflict avoidance or deference and its derivatives seems a component, particularly in the context of energy deficit. But if I'm mistaken. We're going to help eachother figure it out. Whether we like it or not. And if not you then him, and if not me then he. We can be individual without being deranged enough to believe we're pivotal.
Now @Amazoniac. Need I remind you. Nothing you do in life really requires earthly record, and sure shit not the eyes or endorsement of man. It's quite literally for the birds. The ether. The neutrino sea. And the only one who knows. None of us can really account for our distortions, but for the compulsions they come from. You've appended Mr Hatch, acetate and etc with a question mark that ripples. Whether anyone loses their shit and scrubs the deck or not.
-
RE: Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics
Anything is fine but...
This is interesting. Why would a thread author not be content simply deleting their own posts, à la twitter. Why give them any opportunity to delete 9 that others may have put considerable effort in to?
-
RE: Toxic Bile Theory
@Insomniac said in Toxic Bile Theory:
Just thought I'd mention that In one of Grant Smith's streams he mentioned that even his ex-wife never bought into his ideas and she knows him much better than people paying him for advice.
I noted.
https://twitter.com/NutriDetect/status/1543574458044014593
Catch a glimpse of where someone's coming from and things may be clearer.
https://twitter.com/NutriDetect/status/1778967836079296877
We're all aching in our own way.
-
RE: New "Mission" of RPF
Hmm.
@DavidPS have you seen anything from the usual suspects about lipid deposition post rona vax? Just curious. Your links used to take me places.
I'm not substituting a search. Just curious.
-
RE: Is being incel the "new normal" in 2024?
Fair enough. And some joy for me in the first paragraph so thanks.
You're quite a brilliant writer.
-
RE: Is being incel the "new normal" in 2024?
@CO3 said in Is being incel the "new normal" in 2024?:
reactionary morons
If you are not, why aren't you responding to address in another thread.
-
RE: Is being incel the "new normal" in 2024?
@Tahodama said in Is being incel the "new normal" in 2024?:
I haven't interacted with a girl in 8 years
Rectify that. And no need to be handy with language in real life. Except to paraphrase and make it obvious.
Sorry about your dad and the legal system. I mean it.
-
RE: Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics
No problemo. Thanks
Maybe I should email the boys in Maryland or Milton Keynes and ask for theirs. Just kidding.
-
RE: Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics
He's quite busy @Amazoniac so it may take some time to even check if it would be possible.
@zawisza do you have a copy for your ML endeavours you could bucket? I'll try and set this up anyway, but it won't cover the past.
-
RE: Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics
@Amazoniac said in Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics:
Note that the mentions are outside of the deleted thread.Noted.
@S-Holmes said in New "Mission" of RPF:
tiny tyrant
It probably begins when we dig our fingers in to our ears Ms Holmes. I'm guilty by the way.
'Opposition is true Friendship' - William Blake
-
RE: Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics
@Amazoniac said in Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics:
@brad, can you recover the posts? Some assurance of content preservation is needed for commitment, we can't count people having self-control.
+1 and 2 @brad. Is it possible?
I'd like to incentivise you in some way sir. When you're able to flog Bloo in Britain I'd buy that up like the wicker chairs in the crappy 90s film Phenomenon.
-
RE: Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics
@Amazoniac said in Automatic Periodic Archiving of All Topics:
The thread had the participation of different members with parallel discussions and contained compiled information, figures, tables, links, and commentaries that were beyond denouncing a trickster. We have people here and there who found the material valuable, but someone felt entitled to dictate the fate and clear 90 posts by everyone at once, and it's quite mindful with our time and effort.
To mess with the posts of colleagues crosses a line and this was the most reckless move by a member that I have encountered since I started posting on forums. It's the kind of public that self-absorbed charlatans captivate.
It was amazing. Please don't be disheartened.
-
RE: New "Mission" of RPF
https://twitter.com/search?q=mike benz&src=typed_query&f=media
I don't seem to be able to find Benz bit on the documents that empower a "multinational tech corporation" in the first place. Maybe it would be bad for views.