Posts made by ThinPicking

@Kilgore

Affix a Raptor-FVM40 to the end of your attention and ask yourself why you would doubt anyone else's.

@jjk_learning said in New "Mission" of RPF:

I suppose the board will be able to handle it however they feel appropriate but I disagree strongly with the idea of going after someone's license over dietary disagreements such as this.

Yes, they will. That's the point. To ask structured questions that require structured responses. On record.

The issue is a bit more nuanced than "dietary disagreements". But you're entitled to indignation at the thought of it.

@jjk_learning

Why does the board exist. And what is the point of licensing.

https://bioenergetic.forum/post/14046

@A-Former-User said in Impact of Clothing on Health:

I have heart disease

Why did you leave.

@Matt1951

Thank you Matt

@Peatly said in How Your Microbiome Influences Your Dietary Recommendations - Interview With Georgi Dinkov:

The idea that Dr Peat missed something which Mercola is going to clarify is highly unlikely. I could only manage 20mins of this. 5mins in Mercola tells us what Dr Peat missed regarding microbiome then goes on to repeat that he was wrong about fructose too.

And in the preceding 5 minutes he shakes his own desk with enthusiasm about "AI" and tries desperately to land a kiss on Georgi's arse having just slighted him.

It's all quite fascinating.

@hwisdom

Calm down, call a spade a spade and review the hamsters posts. To be fair "fed" and "thick" are probably synonymous regardless of payroll subscription.

No really. Chill.

@Kilgore said in Block function actually to be implemented.:

what really bothers me

It's deeper seated in you than described. Eat sugar and chew through it.

At least half of the design decisions on Twitter and similar are behavioural traps. You're better off banning yourself or getting to the bottom of it.

@Hando-Jin said in New "Mission" of RPF:

But years ago when people were talking on other forums about how obnoxious he was, somebody talked about his father and posted and all the kooky metaphysical ideas he was into. Just completely insane stuff. I think it's simply a case of the apple not falling far from the tree. Nobody born to someone like that is coming out normal.

Good day Mr "Charlie". I see you're flapping around looking for a more palatable horse to back. That's understandable.

Just a very friendly reminder for you. We're not all so maladapted. That domain is coming home one way or another. You're simply labouring under the patience of saints right now (somewhere beyond this place).

Have a nice evening chap.

Fascinating. Thank you David.

@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Daily Aesthetics Dump: Embracing Energy, Beauty, Strength, and Greatness:

None of it makes any sense.

Now you're getting somewhere duckling.

Are those "sugary carbs" more than half of total carbs, are those carbs 1/3rd of your macronutrients, are you adding enough or too much salt and drinking enough or too much fluid. Is your circadian disordered. These are rhetorical questions for thee that should only beg more.

Use of the word "Peating" appears to be a form of self deprecation at times.

@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Daily Aesthetics Dump: Embracing Energy, Beauty, Strength, and Greatness:

Ugliness is evil.

It's in your eye before it's anywhere else. And we all know why Norwegian.

Have a great day.

Monday.

https://youtu.be/ahiZmzaoYZ8?si=qFTylK7LW2Mn38Il

@hwisdom said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:

look at wtat the bible says (revelations 2-3:9)

As far as I can tell, it's telling you in no uncertain terms to be very very careful throwing the J word around. And think twice.

Take a look around you in earnest. To this casual observer at least, it would appear they take their roll un to us quite seriously. It's probably not a good idea to try and demoralise or demonise them. Please have a think about that.

@Jakeandpace said in Ashkenazi jew ahh looking coworker made fun of me for peating:

Yea a lot of white supremacist nonsense on that aesthetic thread as well. should be some rules against this kinda stuff or else it will give the forum a bad rep and I assume most of the people in here don't agree with that kind of stuff.

You assume correctly j&p.

But attempt can be made of this and other obscenity to talk it in to dust. It's only logic really. If a person won't engage in that or present constructive retort to a previous instance. They're bannable. Try and wall them off without doing this. And something bad will probably happen.

When a person's misdirecting anger, they're essentially sat by the side of the road with their arms crossed, relentlessly whining. Lacking the energy or wherewithal to get the hell up. And trying to convince other people to sit down with them and be mad. This metaphor has been sponsored by God.

@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Daily Aesthetics Dump: Embracing Energy, Beauty, Strength, and Greatness:

How poor most faces are! With the exception of those that are beautiful, good-natured, or intellectual, that is to say, the very few and far between, I believe a person of any fine feeling scarcely ever sees a new face without a sensation akin to a shock, for the reason that it presents a new and surprising combination of unedifying elements. To tell the truth, it is, as a rule, a sorry sight.

The proof is in the pudding eh Norwegian. Avoid mirrors for a while and get to work.

@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:

Putting the main burden on the individual is a mistake (or just a dirty political trick). The whole society (politicians and citizens) should work together on systemically solving problems.

Why the hell do you think I'm bothering to talk to you.

Have a nice evening Kvirion.

@Kvirion said in The ethics of having children while in sub-standard metabolic condition:

They don't even get what was the original purpose of democracy invented in ancient Greece, etc. And most importantly politicians aren't (systemic) problem-solvers, they just chatter to pander to specific voters...

It's not their job to get it, it's yours. And to continuously remind them of it.

It's also not their job to be problem-solvers, they're law makers. Book keepers. So tell them. What to write down and what to rub out.

Probably a good idea to read directive 2017/1132 and work backwards to domestic statute. Beginning to read legalese is a bit like us all reading studies on sci-hub from 2011. The more you do it. The more you comprehend. As if by magic.

Quite a bit of work to be done. And no rest for the wicked.

@Norwegian-Mugabe said in Daily Aesthetics Dump: Embracing Energy, Beauty, Strength, and Greatness:

Only feminine retards thinks quoting someone is plagiarism.

It wasn't a quote. And projection is ill advised in the Babylonian Talmud and the New Testament. Calm down Mr Norwegian.