Posts made by Butter Girl

@Jaffe said in Glucose loading cures everything?:

@S-Holmes said in Glucose loading cures everything?:

Quick update. I'm still on 6 TBSPs of glucose 3 to 4 times a day. I've been taking my temperature again lately and am amazed. My afternoon temps are running 99° to 99.3°. I used to take thyroid (T3), maybe 10 years ago, and my temps were still in the dumpster. The thyroid didn't do much for me. So I've had an aha moment. In order for thyroid to work it must have enough glucose. (RP101), so the glucose therapy is restoring thyroid function. I have never restricted sugar, never done the keto diet, but apparently my high stress levels and PUFA's were enough to wreck my metabolism. Glucose to the rescue!

Ragweed been kicking out ass lol idk why I didn’t think to try this again

Not trying to divert this topic but if you have ragweed allergies, see the thread I posted about (my) allergies and ragweed:
https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/2889/black-sseed-for-asthma-and-allergy-conditions-it-works?_=1726706798350

Black Seed For Asthma- It Really Works!

Just posting this for anyone who has seasonal allergy induced asthma or breathing problems.

From August-Sept. where I live, Ragweed is abundant and highly allergenic for me. Every year at this time I suffer thru the season, but not now.

I’ve discovered an excellent Black Seed Oil product (no I don’t sell this) that utilizes a higher form of the active ingredient Thymoquinone. I’ve tried many different homeopathic supplements and remedies for my allergies but I haven’t found a product that works as well as this.

All I can say is this really works. For my allergies.
I don’t know if it’s because it’s a particularly potent brand, but Black Seed and Black Seed Oil has a lot of research behind it for many different conditions.

This stuff is amazing.

@yerrag said in Are Nuts In Their Natural State Used Differently By The Body Than Their Processed Oils?:

I now can afford to minimization rather than a total PUFA elimination diet. I use butter, ghee, refined coconut oil, and fully hydrogenated coconut oil (especially for deep frying , though I air fry but there is no contest comparing deep to air fry).

I do the same. I’ve been avoiding PUFA for a while. I use butter/ghee for frying, but I rarely fry or saute at all.

I also use a high quality, highly rated olive oil for things like a salad. I don’t use the ordinary olive oils sold in grocery stores due to the common practice of cutting cheaper olive oil with other questionable oils.
Even though I don’t cook with any PUFA oils, I have always wondered about nuts in their natural state though. That’s why I had posted the topic.

@yerrag said in Rudolf Steiner's Great Lectures Has Me As Impressed As When I Started on My Health Journey with Ray Peat:

@Butter-Girl

It’s a scary thought. Healing from the spiritual route is something we are not used to, being that we are mostly closed to material or physical healing. The more I get familiar with esoteric Christianity, the more I am open to spiritual healing as a component of our healing. One reason the powers that be keep pushing for vaccination for everything has to include separating is from the spirit.

One more reason to resist vaccination.

Definitely. The powers don’t want people actually thinking, just following. You are right. They want us disconnected to our spirits because it’s our spirit that connects us to the divine, beyond ourselves.

And this has nothing to do with religion. Religion is a man made construct. Man made, man constructed
religion has nothing to do with true spiritually imo.

Religion was formulated by certain individuals throughout the ages to control man’s spirit, and the free expression thereof. And since by nature, mankind wants to be connected to others thru validation, mankind has willingly followed the crowd. Often times to their own detriment.

Plus, eradicate one’s connection with divine Creator, ie highjack the VMAT2 gene, and you got masses of humanity under control just like you want. Slaves.

I’ll add to what I wrote….I think the difference between someone who is religious and someone who is spiritual: a religious person is motivated by the collective, what the group says to do.

The spiritual person is motivated by what their inner
cognitive self, (the soul, their intellect) is saying to them. Which is then either validated or rejected by their spirit.

As we may be familiar, the exoteric is the external. The group think.The religion think. What others tell one how to behave.
Basically a person who operates on this level lets others do their thinking for them. Think of how certain internet forums operate.
The more esoterically minded individual, is one who looks within.
Of course, people can abuse the idea of looking within by listening to the wrong voices and thus go in a direction that leads them down the wrong path.

I think you have to know yourself very well to determine what is valid for you. Much wisdom comes from personal experience, trial and error. A lot of people can come to the wrong conclusions, because they haven’t had the experiences to know what is valid or not.
They believe they are thinking for themselves when in reality their thoughts are motivated by outside influences.
Many novices think that by listening to some guru, they have arrived at the answers, but they haven’t tested for themselves, how that answer is valid or not.
A big part of receiving answers has much to do with humility. Being willing to learn from one’s mistakes. Being willing to recognise that you know very little.

@sphagnum said in Are Nuts In Their Natural State Used Differently By The Body Than Their Processed Oils?:

@Butter-Girl depending on how far you moved, there might be some trees close by. It wasn’t until I identified what a black walnut fruit looked like that I realized they’re all over around me, mostly on public land.

Yeah, I imagine an occasion single nut off the tree isn’t going to do much harm. I still wouldn’t make a habit of it, but I wouldn’t fret over it either.
Considering the work involved, most people wouldn’t bother getting to the point of overeating them straight off the tree.

I know that TerraSoul sells some nuts direct from refrigeration when you buy from their website. I used to get their Brazil nuts and keep them cold, eating one a day for selenium, after scraping the skin off *a seed/nut’s skin is where their phytic acid is concentrated, and that stuff will bind up important nutrients, including but not limited to calcium, magnesium, zinc, selenium, and potassium. Contrary to what you read online, soaking doesn’t always fix this, especially if the seed/nut isn’t viable to sprout (heat treated/irradiated/broken/deshelled in some cases)

I definitely second what LucH said in regards to using Vitamin E to reduce harmful effects.

Yeah, I use Georgi’s Vit. E.

@sphagnum said in Are Nuts In Their Natural State Used Differently By The Body Than Their Processed Oils?:

@Butter-Girl
Are you asking about how the body uses specifically just the oil in the whole nut, as opposed to the pure oil after processing? Or are you asking about how it uses everything else in the nut as well, like the fiber and protein?

Since I'm uncertain of the exact question at hand, I'll give some general info and hope that it manages to answer in some way.

• Just about any nut (or seed) oil that is processed for consumption as a food is going to be almost all polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA.) Exceptions that I'm aware of would be macadamia nuts, and palm kernel oil. To avoid any confusion, some other food oils that are not mostly PUFA are coconut, palm, olive, and avocado oils, but these all come from the fruit flesh of the plant and not their nut/seed.

• PUFA, even when not processed, is prone to oxidation, which is in large part why it is often considered toxic to the body. Extracting the oil greatly increases its surface area exposed to oxygen, thus making it much worse in this sense. However, even whole nuts are going to be exposed enough to risk rancidity.

• As I alluded to, there is a variance in oxidation based on the level of exposure. Oil is going to be highest. Loose nuts would be next. Then nuts still in a hard shell. Finally, nuts that have the flesh in tact around the shell are generally the least oxidized. If you find a fresh black walnut fruit this time of year (early autumn in the US) and cut it open, remove the shell, then break open the shell, you will taste a walnut that is nothing like anything you've even gotten from the store, including the ones still sealed in the shell at the store.

• Heating PUFA is going to cause it to oxidize even more. I have not seen many nut or seed oils that are cold pressed, so you can assume that most of the processed nut/seed oils are going to be more toxic for this reason as well. If they are used for cooking, that is obviously taking the oxidation even farther.

• Heating, of course, is not restricted to the oils. Many nuts in their whole state are often roasted to enhance palatability. Most any nut is going to be at least steam treated or pasteurized in some way. Even packages labeled as "Raw" may have been heat treated as there is no legal definition (in the US at least) as to what "raw" means. Cashews, for example, cannot be truly raw because they contain a toxin similar to poison ivy that is only neutralized by heating them. Search for "raw cashews" online, though, and you'll get plenty of hits. Another example of this would be almonds. All USA grown almonds sold on the market must, by law, be pasteurized. So if you have California almonds (the most abundant variety domestically) and they're labeled "raw," unless you bought them direct from the farmer before heat treating, its a lie. Imported almonds aren't subject to this law in case that particular food interested you.

So, to summarize, I don't know that the body is going to "use" them any different, but the total amount of PUFA exposure, as well as how toxic it is due to oxidation, is going to vary greatly. I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong here, but I believe that the more toxic the PUFA in the body's system during digestion, the more likely it is to be shuttled off to be stored as body fat, to avoid it causing issue anywhere else.

“If you find a fresh black walnut fruit this time of year (early autumn in the US) and cut it open, remove the shell, then break open the shell, you will taste a walnut that is nothing like anything you've even gotten from the store, including the ones still sealed in the shell at the store.

Interesting, I used to have black walnut trees around my old home, but I never tasted them.

Yeah, I was thinking that the processing of nuts might make them more detrimental than if in their natural state. But as Luch had mentioned in another comment, it could be the time element of how long the nuts are exposed to air and thus oxidized that makes it worse.

I suppose a freshly picked nut just grown on a tree and then eaten might be ok once in a while?

But unless you have nut trees around your home, you are stuck with store bought nuts that have probably already been sitting in warehouses, shelves for a long time.

@Hearthfire said in The raypeatforum.com no longer exists. It's now the LowToxinForum.com. Mrs. Peat defends Ray's legacy:

@yerrag You should take your content off the site and post it here.

I second that.

@sphagnum said in Are Nuts In Their Natural State Used Differently By The Body Than Their Processed Oils?:

@Butter-Girl
Are you asking about how the body uses specifically just the oil in the whole nut, as opposed to the pure oil after processing? Or are you asking about how it uses everything else in the nut as well, like the fiber and protein?

To be more specific, I was asking are nuts in their natural state right out of the shell, as detrimental (pufa wise) as a processed nut, aka like an oil or butter.
I would think the latter would be more detrimental to the body being processed, as opposed to a nut in it’s natural state.

That’s what I was wondering about.

@Hearthfire said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Butter-Girl

Yeah, just a domain switch.

Would be good if all the "famous" posters from over there that contributed a lot took their content down, admin doesn't own it, and judging by the "Low toxin" nonsense, he doesn't want it either.

Users own their content, he doesn't have any rights to it.

I agree. No one’s “owning it”. Particularly Lion dude forum moderator. No one’s taking responcibility for the way it was handled. It’s one thing to have a change in approach which obviously he did. Fine, believe what you want. Anyone can have a change in one’s perspective. That’s not the issue.

What is the issue is the way he handled it in such a dismissive, disrespectful, tactless way which is an insult to all the people who invested time and energy into it.

And those folks who still hang around there who didn’t call him out and gave him a pass. They’re guilty too. They look like controlled subservient little yes men and woman.

Brainwashed…….it’s just sad.

Anyway, I’m addressing the elephant in the room, but I’ll say what most of the former forum members are probably thinking but not saying here…
it really isn’t fair that the more well known posters and not so well know posters who contributed a lot of good information, and who are pro Peat in outlook, still have their previous information now lumped into a so called new branded non toxin forum (wherever the hell that means) which is the antithesis of Peat’s ideas.

Because of course, since Peat is now becoming more mainstream, someone new might have recently visited that forum and thought, hey, all these previous informative posters are down with this so called new non toxic approach.

Which again, is the antithesis of Peat’s ideas.

As I said before, it’s all so very disingenuous.

It was handled the totally wrong way by Lion dude and leaves a bad taste in everyone’s mouth. Especially for people like Peat’s partner Katherine. It was good she contacted him. It was necessary.

The abrupt sudden about face and behavior of Charlie not addressing the “change” in a respectful manner was/is like a slap in the face to her and others associated with Peat and his work.

Disrespecting Peat, yet using Peat at the same time. You let it go on too long.

That’s shitty. Way to go Charlie.

There, got that off my chest.

@wrl said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Verdad said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Hope someone has saved all the posts and discussions somewhere because there is some great stuff there.

It looks like all the forum content has simply been moved to the new site.

No it hasn’t been moved to a new site. It’s the same ole forum. Just has a new name.

Ya know though, he’s still got that “Perceive,Think, Act” banner on his new forum.

Wasn’t that phrase attributed to Peat?

Edit: it’s NOT a new forum. He still has ALL the same old posts. He simply changed the name.

What he SHOULD do is start over completely, get a new forum and build on his new crackpot theories.

I see he’s STILL using Peat and he’s STILL using forum members and he’s STILL using anyone from the past who contributed their thoughts.

Geesh he SO SLIMY!

@Hearthfire said in New "Mission" of RPF:

@Butter-Girl "Ironically" a few days after he changed it she contacted him What timing. He DEFINITELY knew it was coming and took pre-emptive action, he's scared of a lawsuit lol.

What a goober. Imagine paying to post on that forum.

RPF is officially dead.

Yeah, I agree. Totally.

@LucH
Ok thanks I see

Just wondering…..

@Kvirion said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Kaboom!

Finally...

“Change is in the air”

Oh please…..that comes across as so shallow…

He’s phrased like he’s got a new (and better) way of life. Well what about all the time you invested over the years of studying and applying Ray Peat’s ideas?

It’s all so disingenuous.

@Kvirion said in New "Mission" of RPF:

Kaboom!

Finally...

Well at least he won’t be tarnishing Ray Peat’s legacy.

Just seemed hypocritical to associate yourself with Ray Peat when you were literally trashing him. Surely he learned something from Peat?

@yerrag said in Rudolf Steiner's Great Lectures Has Me As Impressed As When I Started on My Health Journey with Ray Peat:

@Butter-Girl said in Rudolf Steiner's Great Lectures Has Me As Impressed As When I Started on My Health Journey with Ray Peat:

@CrumblingCookie said in Rudolf Steiner's Great Lectures Has Me As Impressed As When I Started on My Health Journey with Ray Peat:

I just put this here for your appreciation. 5th day lecture GA 177:

"We should not fool ourselves, for we are faced with a quite specific movement. At the Council of Constantinople it was decreed that the spirit did not exist; it was dogmatically stated that the human being consisted only of body and soul, and it was heresy to speak of a human spirit. In the same way attempts will be made to decree the soul, the inner life, as nonexistent.

The time will come — and it may not be far off — when quite different tendencies will come up at a congress like the one held in 1912 and people will say: It is pathological for people to even think in terms of spirit and soul. ‘Sound’ people will speak of nothing but the body. It will be considered a sign of illness for anyone to arrive at the idea of any such thing as a spirit or a soul. People who think like that will be considered to be sick and — you can be quite sure of it — a medicine will be found for this. At Constantinople the spirit was made non-existent. The soul will be made non-existent with the aid of a drug. Taking a ‘sound point of view’, people will invent a vaccine to influence the organism as early as possible, preferably as soon as it is born, so that this human body never even gets the idea that there is a soul and a spirit.

The two philosophies of life will be in complete opposition. One movement will need to reflect how concepts and ideas may be developed to meet the reality of soul and spirit. The others, the heirs of modern materialism, will look for the vaccine to make the body ‘healthy’, that is, makes its constitution such that this body no longer talks of such rubbish as soul and spirit, but takes a ‘sound’ view of the forces which live in engines and in chemistry and let planets and suns arise from nebulae in the cosmos. Materialistic physicians will be asked to drive the souls out of humanity.

People who think that playful ideas will help them to look ahead to the future are very much mistaken. We need serious, thorough, profound ideas to look ahead to the future. The sciences of humanities are not a game, nor just a theory; they are a true duty towards the development of humanity."

Also, any Church-affiliated Christians will always find reasons to deny and begrime Rudolf Steiner's thinkings and serious spirituality (intrinsic duplicities and superficialities aside), for it is not theirs to meddle with the dangers of the spiritual world but to rely on Christ or their instituted churchmen/bishop/exorcist or occultist/confusionist/extortionist to stand and act as a trustworthy gatekeeper between the realms in order to keep them safe and provide guidance.
Which is quite an example of self-imposed mental immaturity. Very anti-enlightenment.
Which can be alright, even a wise necessity for those who are otherwise unprepared.
Even in the best circumstances, however, it can also make you think of the story of Saruman when it comes to the middlemen being relied upon over time.

Also, by papal bull, both the corporal human being as well as the human soul are claimed by the pope, his puppeteers and shadowmen. So any Church-affiliated Christians really must not lay claim to either of these two but be content with their ascribed personae.

Have fun with this info.

Amazing isn’t it, what he wrote? He was way before his time but right on target. How can someone not appreciate his thoughts?

Amazing. Thanks for sharing @CrumblingCookie about predicting vaccines.

What other predictions did he make?

As far as predictions, I was impressed with what he had written about vaccines - especially during his time. And how he had predicted how detrimental they were to the soul.

And that is exactly what the present day cov innoculations have done because apparently they erase the VMAT gene, which is known as the God gene. “ a specific gene, called vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), predisposes humans towards spiritual or mystic experiences. “

And he was writing about innoculations during an earlier time, his time. He had a concern even then about what injecting foreign substances into one’s body was going to do to a person’s soul.

“ VMAT2 encodes a transporter protein that imports several monoamine neurotransmitters into vesicles in the brain (reviewed in Zheng et al., 2006 blue right-pointing triangle). Thus, an alteration in the transporter could potentially affect the levels of multiple types of neurotransmitters, resulting in altered brain function. Changes in this monoamine transporter’s sequence or expression have been associated with substance abuse and Parkinson’s disease (Lin et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle; Schwab et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle; Glatt et al., 2006 blue right-pointing triangle; Yamamoto et al., 2006 blue right-pointing triangle)”
https://historyheist.com/research-into-how-to-block-out-the-god-gene-the-vmat2-gene-accepted-for-publication/

@LucH said in If You Are Eating A Higher Saturated Fat Diet, Is It Really So Bad To Have FFA Circulating?:

You wrote:

“ If sugar (fruits and other sources) is used at the right time, at the right level (ratio, quantity and quality), in combination with proteins and good lipids (coconut, egg, poultry, free farm beef), the sugar association + breakfast proteins will equalize cortisol, will help sugar to enter the cell in good proportions, increase cellular metabolism”
So, for example, you ate 3 eggs cooked in a little butter and a sausage, but you also had coffee with cream and sugar…..

=> A lot of sugar in your coffee then. 15 to 20 gr. Or 2 sticks (10 gr) and a Medjool date.

The sugar along with the protein from the eggs and sausage enter the cell and thus increase metabolism? The sugar with the protein is good, is what you are saying?

=> You need a little sugar to avoid hypoglycemia. Proteins have the capacity to stimulate insulin too.
Your breakfast is ill-balanced so.
Poor quality protein with sausage. I eat pork sausage on an exceptional mode.
OK for eggs if they’re free farm eggs (enhanced omega-3). I never eat Be-2 or NL-2. Only Be-1 (free range) or Be-0 (organic) if the date is not good.
Be or NL are suffixes to establish the country where the eggs come from.
You need to balance with glycine when eating eggs. Rich in leucine. You could have a bone broth to avoid taking one supplement.
Leucine enhances growth (cancer) if you don’t manage well. Mind above 2.5 mg.
One egg contain 0.5 to 0.6 mg L-leucine.

If you didn’t have the sugar with the meal, would it not be as good, meaning, as pro-metobolic?
In my example, the sugar is not from fruit, but just straight sugar. Would this still be a pro-metabolic meal?

=> Stressful without sugar.
When you have sugar table (cane or beet, even if brown, exception for muscovado) or when you eat white rice or other refined foods (bread, pastry, cookies) you lack the nutrients to assimilate carbs, namely B1, but not only.

Ok, I get what you are saying. But you didn’t answer my question because I was originally asking about the process. Look back at the quote you posted which I then commented on:

“ If sugar (fruits and other sources) is used at the right time, at the right level (ratio, quantity and quality), in combination with proteins and good lipids (coconut, egg, poultry, free farm beef), the sugar association + breakfast proteins will equalize cortisol, will help sugar to enter the cell in good proportions, increase cellular metabolism”

Based on this quote, are you saying it’s about timing of having the sugar, ( fruit and other sources) and the right amount of sugar along with the other food stuff ( protein and fat) that gets the cellar metabolism process going……and equalize cortisol?

For me it’s a given that my example would be grass fed free range eggs. So that’s not what I’m asking.

You said “the breakfast is ill balanced”.

So, what does a balanced breakfast, according to you, according to peatyish metabolic principals,

what does that look like?

Give me an example. An example meal.

EDIT: Ok I went back over your response and you wrote:

“ A lot of sugar in your coffee then. 15 to 20 gr. Or 2 sticks (10 gr) and a Medjool date.”

So you are saying that in order for the example meal to be balanced, it needs a lot of sugar in the coffee?
Why? Is it the extra sugar that propels the other nutrients into the cell that then makes it more pro metabolic?

@insufferable said in If You Are Eating A Higher Saturated Fat Diet, Is It Really So Bad To Have FFA Circulating?:

I also feel best when I eat a lot of fat. Definitely trust your instincts on it.

I feel great eating fat now because I used to avoid it.

Especially saturated fat. But now I am trying to balance the saturated fat with the protein and carbs.
I notice too much pure saturated fat with little carbs or protein makes me feel clogged up.
It’s a necessary thing to have the fat but too much is just, well, too much.

@LucH said in If You Are Eating A Higher Saturated Fat Diet, Is It Really So Bad To Have FFA Circulating?:

@Butter-Girl said in If You Are Eating A Higher Saturated Fat Diet, Is It Really So Bad To Have FFA Circulating?:

Anyone have an answer?

Why has FFA a bad connotation?
See & "Demystifying FFA" if you're in a hurry
Starting point:
“Free fatty acids (FFAs) are associated with several cardiovascular risk factors and exert harmful effects on the myocardium.” Oxford Academic.
Why are free fatty acids bad?
FFAs may have toxic effects by increasing reactive oxygen species leading to cell death and necrosis [9] and by depressing the immune cell function [10]. In addition, FFAs potentiate insulin resistance and impair glucose metabolism by inhibiting glucose oxidation and by stimulating protein kinase C [1,10].13 févr. 2019. NIH
Do we eat free fatty acids?
Free Fatty Acids (FFAs) are vital for many bodily functions and are available through various sources that include dietary intake, endogenous production, and from stored fats. Understanding these sources is essential for managing dietary needs and metabolic health.
Official definition of FFA (parenthesis) (you can zap)
Free fatty acids (FFAs) are non-esterified fatty acids that are released by the hydrolysis of triglycerides (triglyceride molecule is composed of three fatty acid molecules bound to glycerol) within the adipose tissue by lipoprotein lipase.
Vocabulary: Non-esterified = without the alcohol molecule.
Esterification is the general name for a chemical reaction in which two reactants (typically an alcohol and an acid) form an ester as the reaction product.
=> Fat + glycerol. A triglyceride molecule consists of a glycerol backbone esterified with three fatty acids.

Demystifying FFA

What is in excess is bad. If FFA is up to 5% (15% in very bad cases) it won’t cause any problem provided your liver functions normally and that your muscle cells are sensitive to insulin (when not coated with huge fat, whenever BMI is not > 30).
How much carbs (Optimal ratio)
The optimal ratio between carbohydrates and proteins should be around 2/1. For example 25 g of meat and 50 g of carbohydrates, half of which would be fructose (slower metabolize), preferably from fruit (with fibers). Otherwise, 100 - 150 ml of fruit juice will do the job, as a transient staple.
If sugar (fruits and other sources) is used at the right time, at the right level (ratio, quantity and quality), in combination with proteins and good lipids (coconut, egg, poultry, free farm beef), the sugar association + breakfast proteins will equalize cortisol, will help sugar to enter the cell in good proportions, increase cellular metabolism, etc.
Freely inspired from:
http://www.thenutritioncoach.com.au/anti-ageing/defending-fruit-and-other-noncomplex-carbs/
Conclusion:
If FFA comes from food, there is no problem provided you assimilate well and don’t store overweight calories.
If you have too much fat round the muscles (BMI > 30) you’ll have problems with the liver. You’ll function in an erratic way (bad fuel supply).
If you stress, there you’re going to have problem with FFA. The membranes will relieve stored fatty acids, including arachidonic acid (AA). This is where the problems will increase, at the in terms of inflammation and hormonal imbalance.
Whenever you stress, you don’t function on glycolysis (glucose) but on fat (lipolysis). You need 90’ minutes to recover after an upside-down mode.
AA cascade

See detailed diagram on this link (French site, my forum, so translator needed, but with English links) (different hormonal pathways, from PUFAs):
https://mirzoune-ciboulette.forumactif.org/t2055-les-omega-3-sont-ils-vraiment-essentiels#29809
Note: See Reference 12) too if you’re not convinced by SFA.
12) Les AS saturés – À contre-courant
https://mirzoune-ciboulette.forumactif.org/t1844-les-as-satures-a-contre-courant#25370

“What is in excess is bad”

Yes, that’s what I am thinking.

You wrote:

“ If sugar (fruits and other sources) is used at the right time, at the right level (ratio, quantity and quality), in combination with proteins and good lipids (coconut, egg, poultry, free farm beef), the sugar association + breakfast proteins will equalize cortisol, will help sugar to enter the cell in good proportions, increase cellular metabolism”

So, for example, you ate 3 eggs cooked in a little butter and a sausage, but you also had coffee with cream and sugar…..

The sugar along with the protein from the eggs and sausage enter the cell and thus increase metabolism? The sugar with the protein is good, is what you are saying?

If you didn’t have the sugar with the meal, would it not be as good, meaning, as pro-metobolic?
In my example, the sugar is not from fruit, but just straight sugar. Would this still be a pro-metabolic meal?