In this thread I would like to challenge an idea I have seen many Peaters reinforce: the idea that more carbon in the atmosphere is necessarily good, thus we should not be concerned with limiting anthropogenic additions of carbon to the atmosphere.
The analogy is drawn between human physiology and the biosphere that CO2 is protective and associated with increased metabolism. The idea is that the greenhouse effect is beneficial to the biosphere and involves an increase in planetary metabolism and that more CO2 in the atmosphere can only be a good thing for life on Earth. This notion is reinforced by Peat's own words on page 52 of Generative Energy where he says "I don't consider the "greenhouse effect" to be a problem."
I have no knowledge of Peat ever elaborating on his understanding of the greenhouse effect beyond that line in GE. Bioenergetics is the future, and it could be potentially disastrous if we were to disregard the dangers of a runaway greenhouse effect. If anyone could provide more insight into what Peat's thoughts might be please comment. The evidence in favor of the greenhouse effect is too strong to disregard it so easily.
The Carboniferous Period may help us gain some understanding. At the beginning of the period, CO2 levels in the atmosphere were as high as 1500 ppm (compare to 400ppm today). How could it be that there was no runaway greenhouse effect during the Carboniferous? Could it be linked to other factors, like cosmic radiation?
It is my understanding that gamma radiation has a correlation with cloud nucleation and some studies reflect this. I have heard that higher levels of gamma radiation increase the formation of cumulonimbus clouds. I can find no evidence of this in the scientific literature but if it were true it could have some interesting consequences. Cumulonimbus clouds are very dense and have the opposite effect of stratospheric clouds in that they reflect sunlight and lead to cooling near the surface of the earth. The Earth is currently on a galactic trajectory that leads us to receive increasing levels of gamma radiation from the galactic center. The effect is likely small, but it is possible that over a long time period we could see greater cloud density and thus greater cooling of the Earth's surface.
If this hypothesis holds, our management of the carbon system will take a new shape. By managing carbon addition with carbon sequestration in balance with csomic influences on climate we may move towards a New Carboniferous on Earth.
The Kali Yuga is ending. Is this the path into the next ascending Age?