Posts made by NateHiggers

@pannacottas how many doses (approximately ) in one bottle?

Do you ship internationally?

Is the shipping done in a discreet way?

Where do you obtain the DHT? PPL?

@Derraneous hoy mate! It is tempting to write «follow a peaty lifestyle», but i would assume you already do so. I believe libido only expresses itself when there is an abundance og energy or a lack of sexual activity. For example, the more weights i lift, the less horny i get, and the more food i eat, the more horny i get.

I would also differentiate between two kinda of libido. 1) is the unhealthy libido, the urge to get off, the low energy, low effort «itch» that ultimately lowers your energy. 2) is the healthy libido, the one that carries over to your everyday life, essentially your whole essence, your drive.

Apart from eating healthy and living a low stress life (bla bla..), the thing that makes me full of viril and energy is to not bust those nuts. This will literally drive your libido through the roof, and the energy that builds up is nothing short of crazy. So if you have not tried, give it two weeks.

But since people define libido to be different things, what effects are you actually looking for?

@Cezar4911 most people within the bioenergetics sphere would say that coffee is healthy and that it has benefits that outweigh its negatives. However, from personal experience, no stimulant is a net positive, and the internet is riddled with personal anecdotes from people agreeing with coffee being harmful for their health.

From personal experience, getting rid of coffee and sleeping more got rid of my dark eye circles

Stop drinking coffee

Sleep more

Stress less

Get some sun

Eat more nutritious food

@voldtzeig My girlfriend also tells me that I smell whenever I load up on thiamine. However, not in a urine kind of way, but more in a chemical way, the same smell as the thiamine bottle.

Hello,

After throwing a juice carton directly into the fire, I discovered that there was a thin layer of aluminum lining the carton (as is the case in many TetraPak packagings, apparently). Knowing that OJ is acidic, and will therefore cause aluminum leaching, I assumed there was an inner layer of plastic protecting the liquid from the aluminum, which there is. This lining is what TetraPak calls "Food grade plastic", also known as polyethylene, or more precisely low density polyethylene (LDPE). This food grade plastic has of course been found to exert endocrine disrupting effects, as well as being toxic.

• Is this of concern to you to the extent that you only buy glass bottles or squeeze the oranges yourself?
• Is any supermarket food to be considered safe?
• How THE FUCK do these manufacturers get away with this shit? I did attend some ecological toxicology classes in uni, where we learnt all sorts of interesting stuff. However, the emphasize on "dosage makes the poison" as the central dogma within toxicology really clouds the debate. For example, the safe exposure levels of methylmercury is set at 5.8 mcg/L. This "safe" level is the level where you generally see no adverse effects. This does not mean that it is to be considered "safe". This does not mean that with mercury levels of 5.8 mcg/L you will be at optimal health. Given the choice between eating a piece of tuna with "safe" levels of mercury, and one without mercury whatsoever, I believe most people would chose to eat the piece without any mercury, as we humans inherently understand that poison = bad. My point here is that regulatory agencies should aim for absolutely zero toxicants in our food supply, or other products for that matter. But by having a dogma arguing for "safe levels" of toxicants, the regulatory agencies are allowing manufacturers to poison us.

Some links regarding LDPE:

Majority of plastic food contact articles likely endocrine and metabolism disrupting
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c08250

LDPE inhibits bioluminescence in A. fischeri (i.e. is toxic) https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b02293

The biggest dairy in Norway (Tine) has taken it upon themselves to save the planet. By adding "Bovaer", or 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) to the cows feed, the methane inhibitor aims to reduce the methane emissions from cows by approximately 25%.

What consequences will this have on the cows themselves? Further, what consequences will this have on the consumers of dairy? I have read speculation regarding the intestinal flora being disrupted by the additive, possibly also in the consumers of the products from these cows.

Bovaer is developed by "DSM Nutritional Products Ltd DSM".

@Norwegian-Mugabe

I have gotten preg through customs all the times i have ordered it in Norway

Quitting caffeine helps me every time. Masseter massages also seem to help.

I developed sun allergies when i was 12, visiting Italy. Over the years it has come and gone, especially when in the southern parts of Europe.

However, after adopting a peaty diet, the eruptions has been worse, and even the spring sun in Northern Europe triggers it. I tan a lot faster now, but i’m not sure if there is a connection between the two. I do not get allergies on my face, but i seem to get it pretty much everywhere else, especially where the skin is thinner (chest, behind knees, traps..).

Does anyone here have any experience with PLE? Is it related to higher levels of Histamine? I do get seasonal allergies, but not as bad as when i was a kid.

@dan-saintdominic Are you talking about the crusades against the muslims? You are essentially proving my point, christianity will only fight for and defend its own ideology against another ideology, not caring about who the people following that ideology are.

Second point is great, but as of today, your catholic pope may just be one of the most spineless men in Europe, borderline woke. Christianity is not helping Europe today. Christianity is not even tough enough to help itself, trying to stay relevant at all costs. I am from a protestant country, so I won't speak for you catholics, but we have gay priests and priestesses in Norway today, waving the rainbow flag in the name of Jesus. You are all charlatans.

@dan-saintdominic said in The Future of Europe:

Your priorities are just way out of wack.

Absolutely not. We should most definitely start by deporting every immigrant in Europe. If the people stay in Europe, they will multiply, and they will become more resistant, gain greater influence, seat more positions of power etc. The other points you mention, yes, that needs fixing too. These things are simply solved by going back to a more patriarchal society. It was not christianity that held the sodomy and promescuity at bay, that has always been the men. You fail to realize that high European culture all arose after christianity gradually lost its influence. Christianity is nonsense, people are king. Christianity kept Europe in its dark ages for centuries. If it were not for brave men having the guts to challenge christianity, no high European culture would have risen.

European identity for the past 150 years? No, we have had the rise of national identity. These identities clashed, but with good help from our fellow jooz, putting us up against each other. I want European identity to rise, so we can fight this evil together, and then, Europe may fall back into national identities.

Adding a little text: What I want to emphasize is that Europe is Europe not because of its religion, but because of its people. The greeks were not christian, the roman arguably implemented christianity as a tool of power. Look at christian latin America, it is in a mostly laughable state, despite being more christian than any place in modern Europe. What latin America does have however, is a mongrel population, reflected in the state of their countries. Yes. Great things has sprung out from christianity, and christianity has funded and been a huge inspiration to great artist like Michelangelo, but at the end of the day, christianity is enslavement of the masses, and power to the few, and I will not stand for it.

Here's your great pope going at it

@dan-saintdominic While christianity may solve some of our problems, it is fundamentally no solution to the demographic problem in Europe. Christianity would for sure make our societies less degenerate, reducing abortion, promiscuity, homosexuality, bithcontrol and the likes of which you mentioned. Christianity does however not care about who its followers are, be it black or white, wishing to expand across borders and ethnicities. While christianity may offer great traditional values that would be helpful for Europe, it does not solve the demographic problem. I may be wrong, but there would be no mass deportations in the name of christianity. Only one thing may save Europe, and that is a common European identity. I don't think christianity cares for European ethnostates, but nationalism does.

Christianity has thought us to be shameful and way too kind. This is the exact reason we allow our countries to be exploited day in and day out. Stand up for the uniqueness of, and love for your people, not for the shared common god.

@SelectiveBreeder absolutely peaty. Where and how do we start?

@john what happened to him? Did he ever tell anyone why he stopped posting?

@bronzeagepeater If it happens, it will be the final blow to Europe, especially demographically. It's funny how the media went from "Russia is done / The west sanctions Russia to its knees!" to "We must prepare for war with Russia / War with Russia likely within 5 years" kind of thing. If you ever wonder what's next, just look at what they pushing

@Hitler
Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societies

This wonderful lady sums it up the best

"Without that transformation, Europe will not survive.."

@DairyMilk I believe you, and can say the same about Oslo. Go downtown in Oslo and count foreigners vs native Norwegians, it is absolutely abysmal. I get the feeling of being a tourist in my own country. Foreigners already make up 33,4% of the population in the Norwegian capital. and it is most evident when looking at the younger generations, where the distribution is 1:1.

@dan-saintdominic I hear this quite often, and I believe it to be a simpleton take. Yes, Europe needs to fix its demographic problems, but how should one fix it, and why did we end up with these problems?

Contraceptives as you mentioned are important. Further, I believe the "liberation" of women, putting them in the work-force, devaluation of our currency, more expensive housing as well as the youth spending their years in institutions like universities, etc. is at the societal root of our demographic problems. One could also say that the general health of the average European is not what is was 100 years ago, with a lot of ultra processed food lacking various nutrients, combined with the always-online stressful lives of the 21st century altogether making us less fertile.

You may find it ridiculous to complain about immigration, but the question you should want to answer is why are people not having children? The reasons, I believe, is listed above.

Next, is it possible to solve this without immigration? Yes.

Would it not be just as economically feasible to invest in the current generation of could-be parents in Europe? What about offering low-interest mortgages, where every child up to 4 children, the government would eliminate 1/4 of the mortgage? Seeing that these children one day will enter the work-force and pay taxes, it's a net positive for the government in the long term. The problem is the myopic belief that population stagnation and decline can only be solved though immigration. We humans are literally replicatory machines, capable of replicating ourselves. The solution of course lies in giving us humans the possibility to replicate ourselves, not enslaving man and female forcing our lives to be an institutionalized journey.

By the way, Immigrants are not free either, and they too have their price, in the form of integration, education etc. A lot of immigration is not what one would call productive immigration either. They bring their entire families, and I'm talking about several generations of family to the country they emigrate to. This is not economically feasible, because old people don't work. The females that emigrate to western countries are also stay-at home moms, so they don't directly contribute to the overall productivity in the country either, besides making non-euopean babies, and eating up tax money, which is what we don't want.

So, why do the governments of Europe push immigration?

@Martiño It was indeed split after the Second World War, but the plan for the new world was well underway before Hitlers Germany. Him being a mere reaction against it, one could say.

Take a look at how pro-European politicians are treated by the MSM today, Victor Orban being a good example. It is almost unbelievable that a nation wanting to remain a nation, is outlawed. From an observers perspective, this should beg the question as to WHO is against Europe being nationalistic? Who benefits from Europe not being nationalistic? Everyone with half a brain should be able to figure out that the benefactors of this sweet deal is certainly not Europeans.

@wamantah Ties to Kremlin? Have not heard of, will check out