Dandruff or scalp irritation? Try BLOO.
@lutte For people (anti-establishment) and progressive. Sometimes even anarchistic...
The current left isn't like that definition...
BTW it's good to have different perspectives (the whole spectrum) and look for respectful consensus. Currently, most politicians/activists just push their agenda without caring about others...
@consvmmatvm_est
Sunlight, ADEK, and B vitamins; thyroid levels in check, avoiding PUFAs...
More about it https://raypeat.com/articles/articles/aging-eyes.shtml
Bump; I would like to know this too 
@AryanRaypEat Peat said that the most important was spreading the bioenergetic message. He didn't care about the political affiliation of the receivers. He was rather on the left side (in the traditional sense).
I guess this forum simply attracts outsiders/outliers of the mainstream, on both sides, left and right....
BTW Honestly, I think that currently left and right have different meanings than in the XX century...
@jhp It''s good to know this about grounding https://youtu.be/JGD68wd_f7I
@Gentile
"Antibacterial soap's triclosan is a mitochondrial toxin that destroys sperm motility and pancreatic beta-cells and thus likely causes infertility and diabetes." https://t.co/nybkfo67IA
Source https://twitter.com/ChrisMasterjohn/status/1754264396476321917
Ray Peat said:
"The soaps and shampoos people use are worse problems. Just washing the skin with pure soap alters the skin's endocrine function for days. and doing it every day is an "endocrine disrupter," even if there are no toxic additives in the soap."
@CO3 said in Vitamin E side effects:
@Kvirion I didn't mean asking 'Peatbot'. Just read his stuff, I don't see what's so hard. If you have any idea about his paradigm then you should get that the entire premise of 'low estrogen' is severely retarded.
If it is so easy why can't you enlighten us here? 
@PissBoy said in Vitamin E side effects:
Peat mentions Reichs view of 'genitalization', which is like ape gooning vs artful making of love.
[...]
However if you no longer respond to sexual stimulation/tension with reciprocal feelings it is probably a sign something IS wrong.
Yep, agree. Thanks.
In the meantime I found this explanation about estrogen - sounds plausible https://www.instagram.com/p/CpK558ZokyR/?img_index=1
@CO3 Could you be more specific?
I've already checked some of them, they are pretty technical, but there is no definitive answer to my question...
Could you help or you don't know too?
[Update]
I've just asked PeatBot...
Peatbot: Yes, it is possible to have too little estrogen. Estrogen deficiency can occur for various reasons, such as menopause, surgical removal of the ovaries, certain medical treatments, or genetic conditions. Low levels of estrogen can lead to symptoms and health issues, including:
It's important to have a balance of hormones, and while the context provided emphasizes the dangers of excess estrogen, it also acknowledges that hormones like progesterone and thyroid hormones are necessary to balance estrogen's effects. If someone suspects they have low estrogen levels, they should consult a healthcare provider who can perform tests and provide guidance on managing hormone levels appropriately.
@CO3 said in Vitamin E side effects:
None of these are caused by low estrogen at all.
Could you please elaborate on that? I want to learn more about it.
What is the estrogen level that can be seen as excess and when it is not enough?
What are the causes of low libido when taking anti-estrogens?
@raytreats Good question, I would also like to know where to buy those in Europe/EU? Without a prescription and from a trusted (organic) source...
@urbrainonsugar OK, that's good
I wish you well on the peatarian path!
@urbrainonsugar OK, then I can't agree more. Thanks for the explanation.
I don't see vitamin E on your protocol.
What about gelatin - have you thought about minimizing methionine, and cysteine consumption?
@urbrainonsugar
Question: is a strict adherence to a daily detailed protocol peaty?
What about Think. Perceive. Act?
Do you plan to adjust doses/schedule according to your conditions (external eg. the season, internal: amount of effort/stress. etc.) and also adapt the plan as you progress with your health...
Have you also considered a conditional way, i.e.: IF "I feel/do more of X" THEN "I will increase/decrease Y", etc.?
Have you considered having one (maybe random) day of a week a protocol-free day? Or just alternate different protocols?
@sphenoid Maybe he is thinking, that he's leading a holly crusade against VA... and he will save the whole of humanity and become a hero for eternity 
Or it's all about money...
Or just a bunch of morons, who can't grasp anything beyond reductionistic scapegoating on VA...
@Hando-Jin Yep, can't agree more.
He also seems unable to grasp Ray's holistic/context-dependent scientific method...
Probably Charlie can only perceive reality as a black/white reductionistic dichotomy.
@The-First-One said in The Force:
The most talented men often are highly volatile. Their immense power can be used for good or bad. Training, discipline, sobriety.... Acquiring these attributes are just as important as honing their ferocious abilities into finely tuned instruments.
In other words, it's all about the proper balance between yin and yang...
How does Man fit into this equation? Many would be inclined to see Man as the most finely tuned creature to the Life Force
I would doubt it. Our current greedy civilization will soon collapse... mostly because of the lack of ability to think in systemic ways and long-term...
@brad Yep, Unfortunately, most normies are conditioned to be afraid/avoid everything outside the mainstream's narrow Overton Window...
Some say that people can even have a mental immune system for that https://www.prosocial.world/posts/bad-ideas-recruit-the-minds-immune-system-to-protect-themselves
From the simple statistical perspective, we have something like 85% of people unwilling to make bigger changes (usually, 70% can make small changes and 15% want no changes at all).
And there is a top 1% of the population who are radical change agents...
Usually, the ratio is like this:
BTW An effective way to convince a normie to change something may be to do it in a small step and ensure:
@Norwegian-Mugabe Can you explain? What do you base your assumptions/theses on?
Where did you get the teleological assumption that an ecosystem has a purpose?
(BTW Mine are based on the newest discoveries in evolutionary biology and neo-materialism theories...)
Our bodily complex adaptive ecosystem is interrelated to the broader social/biological ecosystems... It's a fractal relationship.
BTW you are probably talking about the continuity of a lineage - this is not in conflict with a conception of a body as an (embedded) ecosystem.
The ecosystem aims to continue itself, while the body aims to continue through others.
What about the strong anti-aging Transhumanist movement and Antinatalism then?
BTW have you heard about ecosystemic fractal scaling and multi-level selection, do you?