Topics created by Serotoninskeptic

@wrl Thank you for the source

Good luck, @risingfire. I’m still working my way up to an optimal thyroid dose but once I do, I’ll be sure to try progesterone transdermally.

My sincere congratulations to all USA citizens!
I'm happy for you and hope that the EU will follow...

53cfdd59-5c80-49db-9c47-b53d8fc1a241-image.png

Have taken all, tbol and dbol are fine if you don’t mind a little bloat. They definitely work in the gym as your strength will go up a noticeable amount. Need tums on hand for them bc the acid reflux is real after a few days of it. Var is safer but you need higher doses if you’re a man so it’s better to order it in bulk from PPL rather than spend hundreds on capsules. I just started anadrol up again the other day after losing a bunch of muscle from travel and getting sick and I’ve bounced back pretty easily. Just can’t have any bit of alcohol when you’re eating any AAS or else your BP will skyrocket and your bowel movements will hurt.

@sneedful Whatt i love corn tortillas. Mexican food is my absolute favorite

@pannacottas Thank you

Nietzsche, Ecce Homo:

cc365d3e-695a-4fbf-8d92-463cb1592b25-image.png

I second the caution against cysteine supplementation .

There was a study that showed the same life extension from just using glycine. HED was 50g. So cysteine is not necessary.

If you want to increase glutathione you could simply take ergothioneine which increase it drastically and also increase life span by about 25%.

If you want to increase antioxidants generally, you could take selenium or selegiline which have strong anti-oxidant capacity. Selegiline also increases life span by about 25% .

And remember adding just 0.2% cysteine to the diet, abolishes the benefits of methionine restriction. So it is by no means harmless. Especially since methionine can be converted to cysteine so it's almost impossible to be deficient in it.

@DavidPS Thank you

@Milk-Destroyer Very based brand. Health conscious, pay with bitcoin, and religious

post a single paper/experiment proving glyphosate subs for glycine, ever, anywhere. there is a study showing it doesnt

samsel and seneff wrote the paper published in 2016 with the theory it does but then havent yet tested it. yet someone else did on a human breast cancer cell and there was no proof of glycine substitution

glyphosate is known to cause liver and kidney effects in rats at doses people would get from the environment though. and workers exposed to it in central america have developed kidney problems

@Serotoninskeptic wondering if that study shared it's method of action?