Posts made by bio3nergetic

You sound hyper cholinergic. Have you tried methylene blue and/or adamantane? Even if it is a utilization issue, SIBO can cause elevated serum B12 but meanwhile actually causing a b12 deficiency, perhaps not allowing full utilization of choline. Try something like those things, then approach the gut with the basic stuff: carrot salad, vinegar, coconut oil, charcoal, flowers of sulphur.

In my blog of making predictions thru occultism, mostly active from 2020 to roughly 2023/24, I had stated a few times they would want to squeeze people out of the coastal areas. I think they started with FL destruction already, and Cali. I would predict in the next 5 to 10 yrs, we'll see something for NYC, as a big one. The first soft run for that was COVID CON, making a lot of fearful sheep run out of NYC.

@alfredoolivas it appears you are correct on that one! Finally, real progesterone.

Actually the study tells us nothing about true progesterone since unfortunately they use progestins.

It really isn't even a matter of "black or white," but the lack of distinction. It is meaningless to throw around NOS without knowing what type in what context. Apigenin can increase eNOS and improve circulation. In a inflammatory context, it can inhibit iNOS, which is what we need to keep in check ultimately.

Probably trickery best explains "decreased death." After all, from 2020 and on (in which the end of 2019 THE toxic thing that started the clusters of strange illness and death blamed on convid virus) they killed a good amount with more toxins, so-called meds, setting people on "fire" with forced high pressure o2, vaccines, isolation, psychological despair, etc.. By 2023, what was left to kill? Now, talk in real numbers i.e. maiming, unoptimal health, verge of death, sickness... that'll make the picture look entirely different. I bet we will see another rise in overall death in the next 10 years or so when the effects of those who were not killed off (yet) will start to show.

Thanks @DavidPS I am some how not surprised! Arginine anything is a major risk.

@DavidPS said in The Impact of Alpha-Ketoglutarate (AKG) on Skeletal Muscle Health and Exercise Performance:

Alpha-ketoglutarate

Did you happen to see if L-Arginine a-Ketoglutarate is just as beneficial?
I should rephrase, in other words do studies delineate on the amino acid conjugated?

@Luke I know a bit about SEO, and believe it, the more links the more "popularity" signaling to g$$gle

@Mauritio calm down? I'm afraid if I get any calmer I won't have a pulse. It's just a reminder, like I said. Do what you like.

Just another reminder, every time you guys link to that imposter forum, it makes it stronger and more present for G00gle.

lowtoxinforum DOT com/threads/niclosamide-for-fat-loss-uncoupling.42781

This format would be better. A step beyond that would be not to mention its name at all and have an abbreviation perhaps. Such as:

LTF DOT com/threads/niclosamide-for-fat-loss-uncoupling.42781

@cs3000 I think the glucose aspect is a balanced view of it, IF we are truly considering real progesterone, in a real woman who is pregnant. The key point here is it is not a total metabolic derangement, as even the study points out it is not at the insulin signaling level.

The second thing to keep in mind is, fatty acid composition of the organism is not being considered. In the sciences, most of these experiments don't consider these factors.

If the organism is not corrupted with PUFA throughout its tissues, Life does its thing. And it does it through a mechanism to allow the most abundance of glucose for the fetus. Are we to think that pregnancy ends Life? That doesn't make much sense. So I think the problem of dismissal of fatty acid composition, coupled with the use of PROGESTIN in the actual experiments can allow them to reach an end point they are starting with in the first place. They are reaching, and it is to imply a specific villainized idea about progesterone. That is the reason the verbiage and nomenclature is always mixed up and tricky. IF they want to make something clear, why wouldn't the language be clear!

Once again, for those who doubt it, even in that first study, if you go diving and find the reference for the supplemental material, it shows you they ONLY used progestins as well as confounders of ESTROGEN! The idea of true progesterone is merely suggestive as they allude to it. They are otherwise still using progestin. It reads:

"Mice were exposed to Estradiol (E2, 5 mg) and progesterone (P4, 1 mg), versus vehicle (n=3) or untreated (n=3) control, daily for 14 days (controls were pooled). The hormones were dissolved in sesame oil, and delivered subcutaneously.

Let's say we are assuming their implications of suggesting progesterone is bad for the heart, what then would have been an actually better approach? To monitor a population of women, collect information on the average diets, show your metabolic focal point, BUT then demonstrate actual health issues that arise from that. This way we know or at least acknowledge we are trying to know the causes (diet, exposures, etc) as well as if there is a real health issue that results from it. Otherwise you are merely pointing to a physiological, Life is Life process, and implying the rest.

@natureman lol fun for all

@BroJonas Any time my friend.

My world and perspective was changed, starting around 2014 finding Peat and changing my thinking. Along with that my long-time ailment, gone.

@BroJonas Yes, indeed. P4 refers to medroxyprogesterone acetate, which is in fact a progestin. NOT progesterone. The clowns then use other big pharma poisons to passively show they are still the hero, like mifepristone to oppose the progestins actions and say "look progesterone is a real devil."

@wester130 Endothelium is comprised of eNOS. Young people are expected to have good levels. The detrimental form that is a mediator of stress and directly causes tissue breakdown and inflammation is the inducible iNOS.

@Sippy it very well could be interfering with that estrogen activity. Indirectly, higher carbohydrate can have the same positive effects, especially so when taking progesterone. Generally, mineral intake and carbohydrate as easy digestible forms, is important when taking more progesterone.

@Sippy your pituitary activity is most likely tamed by that estrogen, suppressing things like TSH, LH, FSH which are all inflammatory and vexing. It is one effect, but not the way to go about it, but its physiology happens.

Although I would be against using PUFA's, the small amounts, especially with a whole oil with its Vitamin E intact is probably nothing. This actually seems to be yet another nefarious use of the word "progesterone" when referring to progestins. In fact the premise of the experiment is based on progestin.

"...enlarged adipocytes and decreased insulin sensitivity were observed in surgical postmenopausal monkeys treated with estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate (34).

That is NOT progesterone, that is a progestin.

There are NUMEROUS bullshit studies like these, with word play. Do not be fooled. Same goes for many, many sugar studies use the clandestine use of PUFA, without putting any focus on it. Simply blaming the negative outcomes on sugar itself.

One can bury a bomb and produce the artifice of calm. That bomb will stay go off eventually.