Posts made by bio3nergetic

Thanks @DavidPS I am some how not surprised! Arginine anything is a major risk.

@DavidPS said in The Impact of Alpha-Ketoglutarate (AKG) on Skeletal Muscle Health and Exercise Performance:

Alpha-ketoglutarate

Did you happen to see if L-Arginine a-Ketoglutarate is just as beneficial?
I should rephrase, in other words do studies delineate on the amino acid conjugated?

@Luke I know a bit about SEO, and believe it, the more links the more "popularity" signaling to g$$gle

@Mauritio calm down? I'm afraid if I get any calmer I won't have a pulse. It's just a reminder, like I said. Do what you like.

Just another reminder, every time you guys link to that imposter forum, it makes it stronger and more present for G00gle.

lowtoxinforum DOT com/threads/niclosamide-for-fat-loss-uncoupling.42781

This format would be better. A step beyond that would be not to mention its name at all and have an abbreviation perhaps. Such as:

LTF DOT com/threads/niclosamide-for-fat-loss-uncoupling.42781

@cs3000 I think the glucose aspect is a balanced view of it, IF we are truly considering real progesterone, in a real woman who is pregnant. The key point here is it is not a total metabolic derangement, as even the study points out it is not at the insulin signaling level.

The second thing to keep in mind is, fatty acid composition of the organism is not being considered. In the sciences, most of these experiments don't consider these factors.

If the organism is not corrupted with PUFA throughout its tissues, Life does its thing. And it does it through a mechanism to allow the most abundance of glucose for the fetus. Are we to think that pregnancy ends Life? That doesn't make much sense. So I think the problem of dismissal of fatty acid composition, coupled with the use of PROGESTIN in the actual experiments can allow them to reach an end point they are starting with in the first place. They are reaching, and it is to imply a specific villainized idea about progesterone. That is the reason the verbiage and nomenclature is always mixed up and tricky. IF they want to make something clear, why wouldn't the language be clear!

Once again, for those who doubt it, even in that first study, if you go diving and find the reference for the supplemental material, it shows you they ONLY used progestins as well as confounders of ESTROGEN! The idea of true progesterone is merely suggestive as they allude to it. They are otherwise still using progestin. It reads:

"Mice were exposed to Estradiol (E2, 5 mg) and progesterone (P4, 1 mg), versus vehicle (n=3) or untreated (n=3) control, daily for 14 days (controls were pooled). The hormones were dissolved in sesame oil, and delivered subcutaneously.

Let's say we are assuming their implications of suggesting progesterone is bad for the heart, what then would have been an actually better approach? To monitor a population of women, collect information on the average diets, show your metabolic focal point, BUT then demonstrate actual health issues that arise from that. This way we know or at least acknowledge we are trying to know the causes (diet, exposures, etc) as well as if there is a real health issue that results from it. Otherwise you are merely pointing to a physiological, Life is Life process, and implying the rest.

@natureman lol fun for all

@BroJonas Any time my friend.

My world and perspective was changed, starting around 2014 finding Peat and changing my thinking. Along with that my long-time ailment, gone.

@BroJonas Yes, indeed. P4 refers to medroxyprogesterone acetate, which is in fact a progestin. NOT progesterone. The clowns then use other big pharma poisons to passively show they are still the hero, like mifepristone to oppose the progestins actions and say "look progesterone is a real devil."

@wester130 Endothelium is comprised of eNOS. Young people are expected to have good levels. The detrimental form that is a mediator of stress and directly causes tissue breakdown and inflammation is the inducible iNOS.

@Sippy it very well could be interfering with that estrogen activity. Indirectly, higher carbohydrate can have the same positive effects, especially so when taking progesterone. Generally, mineral intake and carbohydrate as easy digestible forms, is important when taking more progesterone.

@Sippy your pituitary activity is most likely tamed by that estrogen, suppressing things like TSH, LH, FSH which are all inflammatory and vexing. It is one effect, but not the way to go about it, but its physiology happens.

Although I would be against using PUFA's, the small amounts, especially with a whole oil with its Vitamin E intact is probably nothing. This actually seems to be yet another nefarious use of the word "progesterone" when referring to progestins. In fact the premise of the experiment is based on progestin.

"...enlarged adipocytes and decreased insulin sensitivity were observed in surgical postmenopausal monkeys treated with estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate (34).

That is NOT progesterone, that is a progestin.

There are NUMEROUS bullshit studies like these, with word play. Do not be fooled. Same goes for many, many sugar studies use the clandestine use of PUFA, without putting any focus on it. Simply blaming the negative outcomes on sugar itself.

One can bury a bomb and produce the artifice of calm. That bomb will stay go off eventually.

@Rah1woot I too hope it is possible. They do have a tendency in stealing real and true will, that is a concern. The usury and discarding of labor, but more importantly, of genius minds. It is a concern. Big Pharma for example you can see do 180's on certain things they were firm about. Why? Because the real and true wills, as you mentioned, are subtly "hi-jacked" and somehow claimed by agents of the controllers. Big Pharma being one. Yes, indeed they seek opportunity within a crisis, that's exactly right. The artifice creating necessity.

@Rah1woot Yes and I think they use the momentum of opposition to build upon an ultimate goal; yet another opposing energy: hence the "dialectic." But as with all ontological dilemmas, one is left with a question of tense. From my own perspective, I see this as dialect as artifice. MAGA for example, as a potent articulation is only inevitable, even as independent actors - which goes to my original point of unknowing opposition, however utilized still for the controllers' own advantage ultimately. In other words, it is creating oppositional force that you are still steering in terms of outcome. For me, the outcome being controlling, technocratic, centralized authority. We should keep in mind how bills, laws, and authoritarianism arises from the mantra "for your safety." It gives rise to the perfect opportunity to create control mechanisms through subterfuge.

The fake pandemic of 1918 ushered in new control mechanisms at the time. Right when the hypodermic needle came into the picture, the medical texts changing, and medicine becoming centralized by a powerful group. And that too was for an industrial revolution. The same exact thing is happening again. Convid gives rise to the 4th revolution. All getting there by this ladder of so-called dialectic. The artifice creates necessity. As they sabotage the opposition, that they allowed a platform to begin with, the effects and ruin by that sabotage then also affords them to create laws and such for "own safety." Convid destroyed a lot of momentum during Trump's term. I now only wonder, what will they do next.

@Rah1woot actually thanks for pointing these specific quotes out. IMHO, the use of "dialectical materialism" seems to be a misnomer. I don't argue with potential as "infinity" and as dialectical materialism is defined, I do not argue with either. Interestingly, I think "dialectical" was the wrong term to use! At least from any Hegelian view.

@Rah1woot Dialectical reasoning based on structures of consciousness can be made plainly true. You make a massive assumption then in presuming there is a overarching consciousness that governs the cosmos. The "practice of engineering" is OUR creation within the "Creation." By our creations, the rules of governing logic apply just fine. Creation with a "C" is the begged question for all. Nobody has that answer. And to assume the nature of it "reasoning" is again, hazardous, and faulty. The hazard comes into light when small groups of powerful people believe the corollary of reality is how they see it, where in reality they are pushing that way.

@Mauritio for sure, they are problems for the advent of thinking: that one assumes one is absolutely right or one is totally afraid of being wrong.

@Mauritio absolutely sound advice, I agree. However, where there's immense absurdity there is too much that is questionable. REAL reality is how we would know life in a Peat Arian world. THIS reality? No way things are as they appear. Learning occultism helps elevate ones perspective as well. You begin to realize uncanny parallels to what's going on around you.

After all, I "dare to think."