Minus the possibility that someone caught up in this shit will experience a lasting and ending oncogenesis, just lol man.
Posts made by ThinPicking
-
RE: New "Mission" of RPF
-
RE: New "Mission" of RPF
@SummerPeach said in New "Mission" of RPF:
The whole thing reeks of a subversive and organised take over.
If Charlie's prophetic bullshit wasn't so consistent. I'd probably be inclined to agree.
-
RE: BIOHACKING by Nathan Hatch, "F*** Portion Control"
@S-Holmes said in BIOHACKING by Nathan Hatch, "F*** Portion Control":
I've spent all day (week actually) working to get petitions signed and people to commit to not signing leases turning my county into a wind turbine nightmare. I'll be working on this until we lose or they're run out of town.
Bullshit will only change form until the emperors balls are cut off. It's possible we all harbour an inherent subconscious aversion to doing this.
@ThinPicking said in New "Mission" of RPF:
(That's a campaign, not the campaign. Simply talking about it will probably do the trick.)
-
RE: Peaty Daily Hair Styling
@onliest said in Peaty Daily Hair Styling:
@onliest is everyone in here bald/norwood? lmao
My norwood three was hard won in battle and modelled after Law as Greenleaf.
(Hair product I use is probably not peaty. Never worried too much.)
-
RE: Hello
I missed the first reply but wake reads ok. Young humour.
I'm old at heart and antiblock. Preference to give and take some shit for sport and see what's what but time's tricky for now.
Stick around SP, peace.
-
RE: I will show you why I am an anarcho capitalist libertarian
In the spirit of this I'm just coming back to say that wasn't unnoticed. And I appreciate some correction or reorientation on anything. So thanks Mulloch.
@ThinPicking said in Reaction system:
@peatolish said in Reaction system:
sometimes it's too taxing to write a full blown reply to a short but helpful comment
Short form reaction needn't be taxing. This isn't.
-
RE: Is it possible to force a creative state?
@onliest said in Is it possible to force a creative state?:
@Milk-Destroyer Consume copious amount of wine and nicotine
Valid.
-
RE: Is it possible to force a creative state?
@Milk-Destroyer said in Is it possible to force a creative state?:
creative but also productive mindset
The holy grail of cognitive space to me.
In a nutshell I'm (still) not sure. But step one (for me) is to beware of the noise. I either have to separate myself from it or compartmentalise it inside. Neither of them feel psychologically healthy. Maybe there's more. Maybe I'll come back.
Plus one for metabolism. Plus one for faith.
-
RE: Niacin now toxic according to GG
This for now.
I don't know about form for fortification without looking in to it but gg's article is still jumping to conclusion for other reasons mentioned by j&p (good spots, nice work).
Same @revenant as this? Nice exit if yes, style to it.
https://raypeatforum.com/community/search/1797490/?c[users]=revenant&o=date
-
RE: Reaction system
@peatolish said in Reaction system:
sometimes it's too taxing to write a full blown reply to a short but helpful comment
Short form reaction needn't be taxing. This isn't.
-
RE: Bird Flu 2024/25
@DavidPS said in Bird Flu 2024/25:
Covid is not yet over.
*Attempt at policy imposition under questionable or false public health pretenses may not be over yet.
Mind the mantra. Just a suggestion, not an instruction.
Some entertaining mental gymnastics from Mr McMillan in the video. Thank you for sharing.
-
RE: why isnt there a wikipedia page for Ray Peat????
@Norwegian-Mugabe said in why isnt there a wikipedia page for Ray Peat????:
Kilgore might not feel like he knows enough or has the right resources to do Ray justice.
None of us do really.
Have a go @Kilgore. Less is more and it's meant to be a collaborative platform anyway.
According to Larry Sanger you're far more likely to have a problem with its regular bedroom dwelling editorial than complaint from anyone here. Who could simply add or edit.
-
RE: why isnt there a wikipedia page for Ray Peat????
@Kilgore said in why isnt there a wikipedia page for Ray Peat????:
also what filth made this page? https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ray_Peat
Probably someone who understands the threat to their game. More importantly, someone content to quantify the cognitive deficit inherent in playing games and considering threats to them. Ergo you called it, a functional retard.
-
RE: BIOHACKING by Nathan Hatch, "F*** Portion Control"
@NotShanalotte said in BIOHACKING by Nathan Hatch, "F*** Portion Control":
Conversation, debate, and exchange 101, a brief "step 0" summary.
-
Be sure there's subject matter to discuss. Post something of substance could help people and spark discussion of what works
-
When composing, ask yourself questions like "What is your basis for (your or my own) claim(s)? When did you apply Hatchian methods (in the case of this thread)? Which ones? Were you able to keep track of relevant details so others in the future would have clues to go by if direct application didn't work?
-
Be open to feedback, even when you don't want to hear it. Attachment to particular people and/or ideas can prevent your mind from flourishing and from truly participating
-
Be deliberate about getting your meaning across. Don't be patronizing, but make sure you're producing quality content rather than doing a poor job followed by asking rhetorical questions.
-
realize that open forum threads are not your dominion, you cannot prevent others from participating
Based!
It's probably for the best I'm in the doghouse and she can't see my endorsement.
-