@what-about-bob

Thank you!

minoxidil and dermastamping/rolling has given better results for most people

700 pages of results

https://www.hairlosstalk.com/interact/threads/very-impressive-dermarolling-and-minxodil-results-from-tressless.117746/page-642

@Anakin Have you tried DMSO? I have found it helpful for pain.

@onliest

Damn you never had a wet dream?

Back when I was in high school I would regularly get them. In fact, there was one night when I had 3 in one night 🙂 maybe the succubus that caused that found you

@wester130 I'm looking forward to getting a solid source of T and doing this some day

@Peatslop-enjoyer Thanks for this. Are there any more archives

@Sugar what’s a brain detox? Like dopamine fasting?

@samson How do you get more fat into your diet? I can;t drink milk to supplant it since that causes IBS flareup.

@Jojiswims I know what you're trying to say, but I believe that extremes beget extremes, and you're entertaining the other extreme even if you don't see it that way.

Unfortunately (or fortunately), St Paul and other letter writers didn't address societal problems in great detail. This means there is a lot of room for divergent beliefs amongst the common cause of Christ, and I have no problem with that of course -- but that's a two way street.

You share,

"There is no longer Jew or Greek; there is no longer slave or free; there is no longer male and female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus." Galatian 3:28

But, he says elsewhere:

"...act like men, be strong..." 1 Corinthians 16:13

"Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God." 1 Corinthians 11:14-16

"Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but like slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart." Ephesians 6:5

Plain contextualization would infer, as so by all serious scholars, that the Bible teaches us to ascribe to some unscientific albeit "natural" sexual and hierarchical norms that are apparently obvious. This seems to be the final Word of the Lord on the matter, until we enter heaven, where another hierarchy rules, that of Love -- "There is neither Jew nor Greek...".

All serious scholars acknowledge that Galatians 3:28 is speaking to the Spiritual realm. Don't dismiss or constrain a woman's gift from God to the church (such as the female Apostle listed in the new testament -- I even listen to female Preachers), don't keep someone of another race from offering something to advance the kingdom, etc. And, most of all, we are to view people of all stripe and flavor, with utmost regard as the Body of Jesus, even if we may have more power over them in a certain context.

"avoid stupid controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels about the law, for they are unprofitable and worthless." Titus 3:9

"... not to occupy themselves with myths and endless genealogies that promote speculations rather than the divine training that is known by faith. But the aim of such instruction is love that comes from a pure heart, a good conscience, and sincere faith. Some people have deviated from these and turned to meaningless talk, desiring to be teachers of the law without understanding either what they are saying or the things about which they make assertions." 1 Timothy 1:4

"whoever hates a brother or sister is in the darkness, walks in the darkness, and does not know the way to go, because the darkness has brought on blindness." 1 John 2:11

"I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” John 13:34-35

You would have to convince your detractors that caring about the existence of their ethnicities/races, is a stupid controversy or genealogy (which was a preoccupation to find and ascribe spiritual advantage in Hebrew culture at the time), or convince them that they aren't loving a race, to desire to see their own flourish.

God himself wants every tribe and tongue to glorify him, not just English speaking Beige people from the final frontier of total and complete assimilation of every human variable:
"After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, with palm branches in their hands..." Revelation 7:9

How you are stepping into extreme:
Clearly, the guy posting pro-Euro pics and memes who started this thread, is advancing what some aptly describe as "esoteric shitlerism," unfortunately combining the whites who love their race, with antagonism of other races. The infowars really write themselves...
This instantly puts a good thing under the heal with the prevailing narrative already overrepresented by every information sharing widget that makes it into mainstream audience viewing: whites who seek to preserve their races are evil nazis who want to enslave everyone they don't murder rape in gas chambers.

The truth is, the prevailing narrative, is very extreme. It's the very function by which whites are throwing away their culture, and love for self, to the point they Will go extinct if they don't make radical procreative choices in the next right now years.

So, your milquetoast love is love message, is pandering to a necessitated interracial marriage and procreation, if whites are to display their brotherly love of other races, and that is patently false. You should talk to Far Eastern indigenous peoples about these subjects some time -- you may be shocked by what you find. They consider it absolutely laughable for any race to position themselves for extinction, and consider it tragedy for whites to be doing so. The fact is, the 11th commandment, "if ye love me, intermarry my race" pounded into our brains from infancy, is a product of post-WW2 counter nazi propaganda, by our own CIA. That is not written anywhere in scripture.

NOTE: I am not saying it's wrong for people who have interracially married to do so, I'm saying that contra-beliefs and efforts to preserve one's race is not wrong, but can be good -- good or bad entirely built on the culture you're raised in, not intrinsic.

PS: your first pic expositing a beautiful black lady, was a black porn star, lol
PPS: I have no problem with all the races loving their own, and think pictures of their best and brightest, would be a great addition to an Aesthetics Dump!

I'll start:
alt text

Booker T Washington:
alt text

alt text

alt text

Joseph Bologne, Chevalier de Saint-Georges:
alt text

Ok

Good

Same RPF and Life Giving Store user- as attached
Had their email hacked

Glad it was isolated

https://bioenergetic.forum/topic/2041/check-your-bank-statements

@thyroidchor27 I couldn't say, I haven't tried any of those unfortunately.

Acromegaly won’t make you taller. It will just make some bones disproportionately larger, and ruining your harmony.

On the generalization of our tropical, lazy nature:

Germanness, Civilization, and Slavery: Southern Brazil as German Colonial Space (1819-1888)

"The idea that tropical environments produced indolence and degeneration has a long history. Scholars of European thought regarding the connection between climate and behavior refer to the European paradigm of understanding the tropics as “tropicality.” David Arnold defines tropicality as “a belief in the intrinsic ‘inferiority’ of tropical as opposed to temperate environments and hence in the primitivism of the social and cultural systems to which the tropics gave rise.”[43] Beginning in the ancient world and continuing well into the modern age, Europeans have seen the tropics as a zone of “otherness.”[44] Additionally, Europeans have long asserted that the environment impacted (to varying extents) human behavior, including not only physical development, but mental and moral as well.[45]"

"Two basic tropes existed, often simultaneously, in the European vision of the tropics in relation to its impact on work ethic. The first was that of the tropics as a paradise of abundance, in fact, overabundance that rendered residents lazy. The other was that of the tropics as an oppressively hot and humid region, the effects of both also led to indolence."

"Regarding the image of the tropics as abundant to a demoralizing point, this discourse existed since the discovery of the New World, but Philip Curtain writes that by the eighteenth century, the “full-fledged myth of tropical exuberance” was common in Europe.[46] The basic premise of this notion was that since the tropical environment produced food so easily, residents did not have work to survive and this rendered them indolent.[47]"

"For example, John Crawfurd was surgeon, Fellow of the Royal Society, and leading member of the Ethnological Society of London. He lived in Southeast Asia for a time, and in 1820, he published his three volume History of the Indian Archipelago. In it, he asserts that peoples living in the tropics are marked by weakness and despotism. “The cause of this phenomenon is in good measure... the softness and fruitfulness of the climate, and the consequent facility of living with little exertion.” Able to survive without working, tropical peoples lack “habits of hardihood, enterprise, and independence” that is necessary for true freedom and civilization.[48] Alfred Russel Wallace was a British naturalist and biologist who spent time in both Brazil and the Malay Archipelago. In discussing the eastern region of that archipelago, Wallace concluded that the fecundity of the area had an adverse effect on the local peoples: “This excessive cheapness of food is... a curse rather than a blessing. It leads to great laziness... The habit of industry not being acquired by stern necessity, all labour is distasteful.” Wallace theorizes that if the whole planet was as verdant as the tropics, “the human race might have remained for a longer period in the low state of civilization” that he finds among natives in the eastern archipelago.[49]"

"In the case of German discussions of alleged Portuguese-Brazilian laziness, authors generally did not assert a connection between abundance and laziness. For example, G.H. von Langsdorf calls the assumption that the natural abundance of Brazil meant that no one worked “very hasty in the least.”[50] In fact, many Germanophone authors stressed how hard settlers had to work to succeed there.[51]"

"The second trope concerning the tropics and laziness related to climate, wherein heat and humidity deleteriously impacted people, and Europeans especially. The relation between temperature and moral/physical development has a long history in European thought. Sixteenth-century thinker Jean Bodin argued that heat produced drunkenness and lust in Europeans, although hotter regions tended to yield better philosophers, since the heat cultivated a stronger sense for inward thinking. According to Bodin, colder climates help spur people to external forms of work, such as the crafts and the arts.[52] In the seventeenth century, French poet Guillaume de Salluste du Bartas described the Garden of Eden as a temperate place, while in the eighteenth century, Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle argued that extremes of heat and cold were not conducive to scientific thinking. Many Europeans thinkers saw heat as detrimental to mental and moral development. Trader and traveller Sir John Chardin asserted that hot climates slowed people’s thinking, and Scottish physician John Arbuthnot argued that constant heat produced laziness due to a lack of expansion and contraction of “Fibres” (sic) that greater variations in temperature produced.[53]"

"In 1748, Scottish philosopher David Hume wrote that those living in the extreme cold and heat were “inferior to the rest of the species, and are incapable of all the higher attainments of the human mind.” However, while he believed that people in the coldest climates were crippled by “poverty and misery” brought on by their struggles surviving in the harsh environment, indolence was the weakness of those from warmer climates. Hume argued that while there were many examples of early intellectual contributions from the warmer regions of Southern Europe, it was Northern European countries where recent advances occurred, while thinkers in the south grew less productive.[54]"

"In 1748’s The Spirit of the Laws, Baron de Montesquieu asserted that due in part to the positive effects of cold on blood flow, cold climates produced more energetic people, while heat robbed residents of warmer regions of their initiative and rendered them lazy. He also argued that people from colder regions were braver and less prone to cunning. He related those from warmer areas to old men, calling them “timorous” and lacking the courage that marked northerners. Furthermore, warmer regions breed a strong love of pleasure that is lacking in the coldest areas and well-balanced in temperate zones. This imbalance fueled a passion that dominated southerners, producing an immorality that did not plague those in the north: “If we travel towards the North, we meet with people who have few vices... If we draw near the South, we fancy ourselves entirely removed from the verge of morality.”[55]"

"German thinkers, too, saw climate as shaping humanity’s development. Eberhardt August Wilhelm von Zimmermann, a zoologist and geographer best known for his three volume Geographical History of Man and General Diffused Quadrupeds, asserted that climate was central to the development of the races, although he saw environmental influence as malleable and temporary. In the first volume of the Geographical History, compared the racial character of Europeans and Africans, including those of African descent living in the United States. He called White Europeans “actually comparatively wiser and more active” than Blacks, but this was “a consequence of climate” and not permanent. In fact, he argued that if a group of Senegalese Africans were relocated to a cold climate, such as Denmark, and allowed to live on their own without mixing with the native Europeans, the Africans would, after some time, become “Nordic white,” by which he meant not only in terms of their appearance, but also their mental capacities.[56] Hence, in Zimmermann’s racial system, climate was the determining factor, and hotter climates bred a slowness of mind and activity."

"Christophe Meiners also believed that climate made people mentally and physically weak. Meiners was a historian and philosopher who believed was a vocal defender of polygyny, or the notion that different races were actually wholly different species. While in the minority of German philosophers by supporting polygyny, Meiners was nevertheless highly influential.[57] In fact, John Zammito argues that Immanuel Kant and Johann Blumenbach first became engaged with the question of race so as to counter Meiners.[58]"

"Regarding climate’s effect on people, Meiners believed it was central to the physical and mental development of the races. In his Outline of the History of Humanity, Meiners wrote that the “strongest men and nations only... live in the mildest climates.”[59] He argued that due in part to the effect of climate, the Caucasians possessed “not only greater strength of body, but also of mind,” and that both of these traits were due in no small part to the cooler climate in which Caucasians developed. Meiners also argued that warmer environments had a deleterious effect on peoples, writing that “even the noblest of human natures are inevitably corrupted and degraded in certain areas and climates,” of which he cited Africa, Southeast Asia, most of India, and assorted regions of South America.[60]"

"In their discussions of Portuguese-Brazilians and their alleged laziness, some German writers did assert a climatic explanation. J. Friedrich von Weech wrote that climate, combined with a cavalier attitude toward religion, “seems to awaken too soon some natural instinct which was supposed to lie dormant until a person is developed fully,” and this leads very young Brazilians to become sexually active. This, in turn, leads to the loss of vitality and energy among young Brazilian men: “the decrepit young figures, the lack of the bold fire that is normally so beautiful in the youth, is only too clearly visible on the pale and lifeless faces of the urban youth.” Having lost their energy through this “early enervation,” young Brazilians turn to even greater debauchery, and in doing so, risk the future of their country.[61]"

"Thomas Davatz also connected Brazilians’ immorality and indolence to the effects of climate. Davatz was selected by the Swiss government to investigate alleged mistreatment of Swiss settlers in the sharecropping system in São Paulo. He penned a scathing report that accused Portuguese-Brazilian planters of a host of abuses, prompting further investigations in Brazil and outrage in the European German press.[62]"

"Regarding the impact of climate on Brazilians, Davatz writes that the Brazilians are unable to control their passions, often leading not only to fights, but even murder. Furthermore, Brazilians are marked by a love of idleness. Davatz relates all of this to heat and humidity, writing that “[t]hose vices... are promoted throughout the Brazilian’s life by the luxuriance of the tropical climate.”[63] Like Weech, Davatz argues that the heat drove Brazilians, and the young especially, to succumb to their base sexual desires, leading to a loss of vitality and adolescents marrying too early. However, in the subtropical region of southern Brazil, Davatz argues, there are many people who live to an exceptionally old age: “People of more than 100 years should be no great rarity, indeed some of these will live to 120-130 years of age.”[64] Davatz hence makes a distinction between the hotter climates of northern Brazil and the cooler region of southern Brazil."

"Beyond relating climate to Portuguese-Brazilian indolence, Germanophone authors also expressed concern regarding the impact of the climate on Germans settling in the country. Carl Schlichthorst, a German who served as a mercenary in the Brazilian army between 1820 and 1822, in part blames climatic effects for the laziness of nativeborn Brazilians.[65] Still, he writes that the “person born in the southern lands has many and great faults,” but that Brazilians balance such faults, including a tendency to lie and a general laziness, with their friendly nature and tendency to avoid over-drinking. However, the hot climate affects the Germans, and Northern Europeans in general, terribly: “almost all northerners who live in hot climates do not bear the particular virtue of their people, they merge in a very short time with the vices of the natives and their national faults.” German settlers bear none of the loyalty that Schlichthorst sees as marking European-Germans, instead turning to indolence and drunkenness.[66]"

"Some Germanophone writers believed that Germans could not work in tropical heat. J. Friedrich von Weech argued that slavery was a necessity in tropical environments. According to Weech, Europeans are unsuited to the much of the climate in Brazil, making intensive farming impossible for them: “it as erroneous view of many learned men, that Europeans, in the hot climate of the tropics for the duration of their stay, could perform the same work previously done by the Negro.” Weech argues that based on his own experience with Europeans in Brazil, even the hardest working settlers lose their vitality within two years, reducing them subsistence farming.[67] In his entry “Regarding Emigration” in 1847’s Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, Robert von Mohl echoed Weech’s opinion that Europeans, and Germans in particular, could not work in the tropical heat. Mohl writes that “there can be no doubt that tropical countries are not good for Europeans, especially for Germans. Such climatic conditions do not allow members of the Caucasian tribe to work outdoors, and detrimental to their health, and nearly compel slave-holding.”[68]"

@PrinceTrebata i have source for 1p lsd and other tryptamine derivatives, but cant get u lsd

@b1 yes but irish coffee moreso

@Tahodama shot or two of bourbon in an iced latte with lots of maple syrup. RBV. Irish Coffee. Tequila salt lemonade.

regular hardcore sex orgies should do the trick, that or ice baths