@sunsunsun I am starting to think this discussion is becoming futile. You did not deal with any of my arguments, which there were many. Your only counter-arguments are “cope”, “weird” and “one shotted”. No constructive criticism was offered.
I never said “ studies arent to be relied upon”. I am not sure where you got that idea. I merely pointed to the flaws which the studies you mentioned have, not once did I say that you should not rely on studies. Or do you think that studies are faultless? That scientists do not make mistakes or act in bad faith? Luckily, many of the shortcomings can be uncovered simply by reading carefully (as I did with the pro-oatmelas studies). Again, you did not offer any rebuttal, you merely dismissed it as
As for your milk argument: Yes? How can you not see that that is a completely different situation? Milk is one of the most nutrient-heavy and beneficial foods which this planet has to offer. Adaptation to lactose does not cause any long-term negative effects, it does not inhibit your thyroid nor does it slow your metabolism/decreases your overall ATP. Once you start producing enough lactase, the problem disappears.
With oatmeals it is quite different, the endotsoxin IS problematic and remains problematic even after it sits in your intestine for five years, the “adaptation” is pathological. Your overall T3 and protective hormones decrease while the negatives accumulate.
How is the phytic acid cope? You did not disprove anything I said. If you are so adamant that I am wrong, explain yourself.
Please provide your examples of Peat being wrong with citing studies incorrectly. If you are so certain and mentioned this repeatedly, you can surely offer them right?
Also what peatosphere are you talking about? There is no RPF anymore, no podcast or any other prominent community. The only semiactive thing is this, which many times go against Peat’s core work with stuff like glp-1, pufa reintegration, severe hormesis or fiber advocacy.
